- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
- Messages
- 14,913 (6.64/day)
- Location
- Midlands, UK
System Name | My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
Motherboard | MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi |
Cooling | be quiet! Dark Rock 4 |
Memory | 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance EXPO DDR5-6000 CL36 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT |
Storage | 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda |
Display(s) | Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz |
Case | Kolink Citadel Mesh |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones |
Power Supply | 750 W Seasonic Prime GX |
Mouse | Logitech MX Master 2S |
Keyboard | Logitech G413 SE |
Software | Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma |
We're being told that "more performance comes at a higher price". The question is whether we believe it or not. I personally don't, because it's coming from the company that gave us the 1080 that was 50% faster than the 980 for a 10% higher MSRP. Now we have a 36% faster product (compared to the 3080 at 1440p) for a 71% higher MSRP. How is this not a tragedy for PC gaming?That is simply playing ignorant. Yes, the card is fast, second fastest in the world, woo hoo! But that happened with every GPU release so far from the early 1990' on. How do you comment on the fact that if we had such price increases every generation, a mid to high end card from Nvidia would now cost approximately half a million dollars? How unbelievably amazing would that be, right?
Again, conclusion paints the release if it's something miraculous - when in fact it offers the same kind of uplift as most of the releases in past 10 years, apart from Turing. But saying it like that kind of paints the $500 price hike in a bad light, doesn't it?
Edit: If we look at the red side, there's also the 7900 XTX launching soon at the same MSRP as the 6900 XT did, so there's that.
Last edited: