- Joined
- Dec 25, 2020
- Messages
- 7,366 (4.94/day)
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
System Name | "Icy Resurrection" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM |
Memory | 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V |
Video Card(s) | NVIDIA RTX A2000 |
Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Classic IntelliMouse (2017) |
Keyboard | IBM Model M type 1391405 |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
Another case where you think you know but you don't.
90% of AMD gpu buyers can't even submit an UL(3DMark) benchmark because their Tesselation bias aginst AMD means users can't even submit a bench run on completely stock gpu's. You are supposed to be able to, but it never works right making your submission invalid. Now about those stats?
...don't use modified drivers (how do you think that NimeZ snake oil works?) and/or leave your Radeon settings at default, and it will work.
If tessellation load was modified by driver settings, then 3DMark will indeed invalidate the score because - well, the score isn't valid, you're cheating.