- Joined
- Dec 25, 2020
- Messages
- 8,923 (5.38/day)
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex Encore |
Cooling | Pichau Lunara ARGB 360 + Honeywell PTM7950 |
Memory | 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB @ 7600 MT/s |
Video Card(s) | Palit GameRock OC GeForce RTX 5090 32 GB |
Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 + 4x 300 GB WD VelociRaptor WD3000HLFS HDDs |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Cooler Master MasterFrame 700 benchtable |
Audio Device(s) | EVGA NU Audio + Sony MDR-V7 headphones |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Classic IntelliMouse |
Keyboard | IBM Model M type 1391405 |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
I find 120 Hz to be an optimal refresh rate, it allows for very high settings without needing the most extreme hardware out there and/or will support high-color and high-resolution modes, but I can tell faster: and most people can, too. They just don't want to admit it to themselves. Usually to protect their wallet.
Sure, one may have difficulty telling 360 and 480 Hz apart past a certain age, but below 200 Hz, I think all of us can tell the difference in perceived smoothness.
Sure, one may have difficulty telling 360 and 480 Hz apart past a certain age, but below 200 Hz, I think all of us can tell the difference in perceived smoothness.