• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Stock Swandives 25% in Friday Trading Spooked by Quarterly Results

Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Messages
375 (0.32/day)
Multi billion dollar company with a tonne of government contracts getting subbed to build new plants and are key to American technological security that has/had large cash reserves and will be bringing new products and manufacturing nodes out soon. They can have a bad day no problem or survive a market correction they aren't going anywhere just because they aren't the market darling anymore they are very strong and one of the few large tech companies that aren't built on straw.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
104 (0.02/day)
Can anyone see Intel coming back from this? They are heavily into capex, it has been years and they have not scored big orders from the field.

All these major cost cuttings are to stem the bleed while waiting for Nvidia orders, beg Jensen, beg TSMC, Pat the batgger
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2023
Messages
279 (0.43/day)
Location
Lake Superior
Can anyone see Intel coming back from this? They are heavily into capex, it has been years and they have not scored big orders from the field.

All these major cost cuttings are to stem the bleed while waiting for Nvidia orders, beg Jensen, beg TSMC, Pat the batgger
I'm 90% conifdent they can survive this but they'll have to find a way to spin off the fabs. And the fabs likely won't survive unless the US government intervenes.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
179 (0.25/day)
Haha, this video is insane. Go the 44:50 minute mark. Look at how quickly he scrolled over this graph. I wonder why :roll: :roll:

You clearly missed the point with that graph, failure rates in the field are much higher than average, also according to Puget systems all of their failed cpus were within 6 months which lines up with failures from other companies having instability or even getting DOA cpus from an RMA.

Screenshot 2024-08-03 005026.png
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,658 (0.79/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,459 (2.13/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
You clearly missed the point with that graph, failure rates in the field are much higher than average, also according to Puget systems all of their failed cpus were within 6 months which lines up with failures from other companies having instability or even getting DOA cpus from an RMA.

View attachment 357359
Not really. Let's focus on 13th gen for example, since those have higher field failures rates than 14th. Still - it's way lower than zen 3 for example.

13th and 14th gen fail at a much higher rate than 12th gen (both field and shop), but at a much lower rate than zen 3 and zen 4. Right? Is anything I said wrong?

The field failure rates of zen 3 alone are higher / equal to the total failure rates of 13th gen. Nough said, no?
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,753 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
You clearly missed the point with that graph, failure rates in the field are much higher than average, also according to Puget systems all of their failed cpus were within 6 months which lines up with failures from other companies having instability or even getting DOA cpus from an RMA.
You clearly missed the point he was making.



Puget said:
You can see that in context, the Intel Core 13th and 14th Gen processors do have an elevated failure rate but not at a show-stopper level. The concern for the future reliability of those CPUs is much more the issue at hand, rather than the failure rates we are seeing today. If it is true that the 14th Gen CPUs will continue to have increasing failures over time, this could end up being a much bigger problem as time goes by and is something we will, of course, be keeping a close eye on. 14th Gen isn’t as rock solid as Intel’s 10th or 12th Gen processors, but at least for us, it isn’t yet at critical levels.

Based on the failure rate data we currently have, it is interesting to see that 14th Gen is still nowhere near the failure rates of the Intel Core 11th Gen processors back in 2021 and also substantially lower than AMD Ryzen 5000 (both in terms of shop and field failures) or Ryzen 7000 (in terms of shop failures, if not field). We aren’t including AMD here to try to deflect from the issues Intel is currently experiencing but rather to put into context why we have not yet adjusted our Intel vs. AMD strategy in our workstations.
Also worth noting that if you read the whole Puget piece they say they only use xx700K and xx900K CPUs.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
179 (0.25/day)
You clearly missed the point he was making.
He was insisting AMD 7000 series cpus have higher failure rates than Intel 13th and 14th gen. If that were the case it would definitely be in the news, the AMD X3D debacle with board makers setting voltages too high got more attention than the ongoing Intel issues have.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,753 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
He was insisting AMD 7000 series cpus have higher failure rates than Intel 13th and 14th gen. If that were the case it would definitely be in the news, the AMD X3D debacle with board makers setting voltages too high got more attention than the ongoing Intel issues have.
Did you read the end of the Puget piece? The graph I posted in the post you quoted? :D

Edit:
And actually, this is a pretty shady/scummy move on the GN part to just glance over that given the context.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,664 (0.77/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 5800X3D
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
You clearly missed the point he was making.




Also worth noting that if you read the whole Puget piece they say they only use xx700K and xx900K CPUs.

The problem here is the LACK of total numbers of CPUs: while the percentages look lower on Intel 13th and 14th gen CPUs, if they have ... say ... 15 times more of such CPUs (example, to explain the point), while the percentage is lower, the ACTUAL numbers would be way WAY higher.

Same thing goes for AMD's 5000 and 7000 series, as well as Intel's 11th gen series.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2011
Messages
432 (0.09/day)
Good. Finally some Karma is coming after destroying the market and stifling progress for ~11-12 years when AMD was nowhere to be found and ARM was just a pipe dream. Saying this as Intel fanboy for decades. It's happening. I've said when 1st EPYC Zen hit the market: when AMD gains 40%-50% of HPC market share Intel will collapse financially. You can't offset that kind of losses, especially with inferior product line-up.

No company is too big to collapse and Intel better get their collective blue $hit together or someone else will come and replace them. Most likely nVidia vel nGreedia because they have capacity. They also have enough of $ muscles and brain power to change PC forever by removing CPU from the equation and rely solely on GPU units for operation.

Example 1 of Intel stupid investment: they pump money into Israel FABs, in the most dangerous point of the planet. Isn't there other place for this, more safe and stable politically? It's just AIPAC bribery (I've nothing against existence of Israel state, so no funny ideas) nothing more, nothing less. Intel has the capacity to go really, really big in EU, Canada, Australia and they say: Nope let's expand capacity further at front line of the war because it's such awesome place for investment! :kookoo:

Example 2: Intel is planning to refresh Xeon W line to 2500/3500 with same Sapphire Rapids silicone. Why? I mean it would be great idea in 2020. Now it's waste of time given that server segment got Emerald Rapids drop-in refresh which trounces Sapphire Rapids in every way including drastic improvements in power efficiency and nearly tripling cache subsystem. Intel on purpose screwing its line up because they don't give an F about customers who purchase their platforms.

Intel right now is running joke of 14nm+++++++++ or 10nm+++++++++ (renamed to something different so it's not so obvious).
 

the54thvoid

Super Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
13,048 (2.39/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
This news piece is about Intel's share dive. While other tech stock is relevant to a degree, dragging AMD failure rates into this is not. Intel's slide is about ongoing CPU and business issues - that's how the market works - expected future profits.

Stick to the topic. Some people posting here should know better by now.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,745 (4.71/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
You clearly missed the point with that graph, failure rates in the field are much higher than average, also according to Puget systems all of their failed cpus were within 6 months which lines up with failures from other companies having instability or even getting DOA cpus from an RMA.

View attachment 357359

This is the one case where the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality of people who would not want to flash BIOSes will cost them their processor. Failure rates will decline from this peak we have today, but they will remain steady as not every system will be patched and as long as they aren't, they will continue to fail.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,753 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Example 1 of Intel stupid investment: they pump money into Israel FABs, in the most dangerous point of the planet. Isn't there other place for this, more safe and stable politically? It's just AIPAC bribery (I've nothing against existence of Israel state, so no funny ideas) nothing more, nothing less. Intel has the capacity to go really, really big in EU, Canada, Australia and they say: Nope let's expand capacity further at front line of the war because it's such awesome place for investment! :kookoo:
Israel is a tech hub and plays a very big part in Intel's R&D. Having some manufacturing in there is pretty crucial to that. Besides, Intel has fabs in quite a few places but largely in United States.

But following your logic about world hotspots pretty much everyone in the cutting edge technology relies on TSMC who has plants in... Taiwan. And building first site in United States. There are facilities in China and Japan but I am struggling to remember if they were full fabs. That might be a concern.

You have a really simplified understanding of what a semiconductor manufacturing site means and requires. The fab itself is tens of billions. But this is a level of undertaking that unless in an established location basically assumes government involvement to some degree (subsidies, direct investment, help with planning), has considerable environmental considerations, the supporting infrastructure and workforce takes years or decades to build etc.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Messages
872 (0.83/day)
Did you read the end of the Puget piece? The graph I posted in the post you quoted? :D

Edit:
And actually, this is a pretty shady/scummy move on the GN part to just glance over that given the context.
GN being shady and scummy gee wiz how unexpected and totally unlike them.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,329 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
295 (0.08/day)
Good thing AMD is in the rearview mirror, can you imagine how bad things would be for intel otherwise?
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
602 (0.14/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 3900x
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600CL16
Video Card(s) 3060Ti FE 0.9v
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 1TB, 2x Samsung 840 EVO 1TB
Display(s) ASUS ProArt PA278QV
Case be quiet! Pure Base 500
Audio Device(s) Edifier R1850DB
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III 650W
Mouse A4Tech X-748K
Keyboard Logitech K300
Software Win 10 Pro 64bit
Also he abandoned GPU and now they are years behind nVidia and AMD while GPU is more profitable than CPU.
Are they years behind? Sure, Intel does not have any high end GPUs, but they managed to beat AMD in ray tracing performance and upscaling quality on their first try.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,753 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Are they years behind? Sure, Intel does not have any high end GPUs, but they managed to beat AMD in ray tracing performance and upscaling quality on their first try.
Yes, they are. They do have the tech and basics kind of figured out but what remains is the hard part - in broad terms they need to build both the brand and customer confidence in the products. This is both time consuming and expensive.

Getting stability in drivers and software has come a long way but they were starting from a very low position, now that they are almost there every improvement will only be harder. They need to build the supply chain with AIBs which is easier as they are Intel but still an undertaking that takes time and money. Plus whether they want it or not the sentiment from failures on CPU and financial side will somewhat carry over to the GPU division - whether that is less money for the division or reduced customer trust.

For example it took AMD quite a while to get things up to speed when they bought an already established and strong ATi. There were several upstarts who tried getting into GPU market way back when - and most failed quickly - but today it requires literal billions to even make the attempt.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,529 (1.77/day)
Sure, Intel does not have any high end GPUs, but they managed to beat AMD in ray tracing performance and upscaling quality on their first try.
Did they? Must've missed that, any reviews highlighting that especially the latter?
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2016
Messages
3,412 (1.16/day)
System Name The de-ploughminator Mk-III
Processor 9800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master
Cooling DeepCool AK620
Memory 2x32GB G.SKill 6400MT Cas32
Video Card(s) Asus RTX4090 TUF
Storage 4TB Samsung 990 Pro
Display(s) 48" LG OLED C4
Case Corsair 5000D Air
Audio Device(s) KEF LSX II LT speakers + KEF KC62 Subwoofer
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Mouse Razor Death Adder v3
Keyboard Razor Huntsman V3 Pro TKL
Software win11
Man Intel is the underdog now huh, better buy Arrow Lake to support the underdog :D
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,529 (1.77/day)
Yeah maybe they won't need to extend warranty on those chips because it's made on TSMC?

Also remember folks most motherboard "defaults" are Intel approved, like 99.99% of them!
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,753 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Are they years behind? Sure, Intel does not have any high end GPUs, but they managed to beat AMD in ray tracing performance and upscaling quality on their first try.
Did they? Must've missed that, any reviews highlighting that especially the latter?
There are a whole lot more to be found.

The evolution of upscaling algorithms has been relatively straightforward - old image-based upscale, then for a long while Lanczos variations with some sharpening on top, then a temporal component got added (think TAAU) and latest rage is some "AI"-derived stuff running on matrix operations (like Tensor or XMX cores). AMD is step behind in this from both Nvidia and Intel. One could guess the AI cores are not there yet and that is why.
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Messages
170 (0.32/day)
Location
Holy Roman Empire
System Name Shadowchaser /// Shadowchaser Jr.
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700 /// AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming /// Asus ROG Strix B550-E Gaming
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S chromax.black /// Thermalright Venomous X
Memory Kingston Fury Beast RGB 6000C30 2x16GB /// G.Skill Trident Z RGB 3200C14 4x8GB
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce RTX 4080 Trinity 16GB /// Gigabyte G1 GTX 980Ti
Storage Kingston KC3000 2TB + Samsung 970EVO 2TB + 2x WD Red 4TB /// Samsung 970EVO 1TB + WD Red 4TB
Display(s) Gigabyte M27Q /// Dell U2715H
Case Fractal Define 7 Black /// Fractal Define R5 Black
Power Supply Seasonic SS-750KM3 /// Seasonic SS-660KM
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S /// Logitech MX Master
Software Linux Debian 12 x64 + MS Windows 10 Pro x64
Are they years behind? Sure, Intel does not have any high end GPUs, but they managed to beat AMD in ray tracing performance and upscaling quality on their first try.
What? When? Where?
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,529 (1.77/day)
There are a whole lot more to be found.

The evolution of upscaling algorithms has been relatively straightforward - old image-based upscale, then for a long while Lanczos variations with some sharpening on top, then a temporal component got added (think TAAU) and latest rage is some "AI"-derived stuff running on matrix operations (like Tensor or XMX cores). AMD is step behind in this from both Nvidia and Intel. One could guess the AI cores are not there yet and that is why.
Performance is at par with DLSS/XeSS as for IQ or upscaling that's at least partly subjective. It doesn't mean that Radeon is better but we need more data there, for instance RTX super resolution or (auto) HDR settings work relatively great on Nvidia. I don't have any AMD GPU to compare it against though.
 
Top