• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Cyberpunk 2077 Update Adds AMD FSR 3 and Frame Generation for PC Players

Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,276 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
You can't expect developers to optimize for only 10% of the market.
I agree with what you say, I will just comment on this part.
If an AMD user and an Nvidia user buys the game, they will both pay the same amount of money. If the game developer can't or wouldn't optimize for a certain hardware, then they should be selling the game to those using that hardware at a lower price. Else they are becoming part of the problem that drives the market to a monopoly.

how hard of an AMD fanboy you are
Would you please stop calling the others fanboys. It doesn't help how you look. You don't become more objective in others' eyes.
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2023
Messages
45 (0.13/day)
Processor Intel i9-11900K
Motherboard TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P w/ 2x NF-A12x25
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB [4x8GB 3600MHz DDR4 CL16]
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming 16G OC
Storage GAMMIX S70 Blade 1TB & SanDisk 3D 1TB
Display(s) AOC AG275QXN
Case Fractal Design Pop Air TG
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 750W
Mouse Logitech G102
Keyboard Gigabyte Force K7
VR HMD -
Software Windows 10 22H2
Benchmark Scores Cinebench 2024 Multi-core: 865
I doubt AMD can give enough money to CDPR to convince them to optimize for AMD in the same way they optimize for Nvidia.

There is literally RYZEN logo on the CP2077 startup screen...
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,276 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
11,411 (5.50/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2, 4 + 8 TB Seagate Barracuda 3.5"
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
I agree with what you say, I will just comment on this part.
If an AMD user and an Nvidia user buys the game, they will both pay the same amount of money. If the game developer can't or wouldn't optimize for a certain hardware, then they should be selling the game to those using that hardware at a lower price. Else they are becoming part of the problem that drives the market to a monopoly.
In my opinion, games should not be optimised for this or that. They should be as hardware-agnostic as possible. I bet we all thought this would be the case with most, if not all of them with DirectX 12 Ultimate, but hardware makers (especially Nvidia) just can't stop pushing their own agenda, and people buy into it, unfortunately.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,276 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
In my opinion, games should not be optimised for this or that. They should be as hardware-agnostic as possible. I bet we all thought this would be the case with most, if not all of them with DirectX 12 Ultimate, but hardware makers (especially Nvidia) just can't stop pushing their own agenda, and people buy into it, unfortunately.
They might had less bugs that way. There are games that where a huge mess, because the developers where trying to implement specific features in them.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2023
Messages
233 (0.38/day)
Yet another case where modded in FSR3 works better than native one. HDR is still broken with FSR3 they implemented, while it works normally with modded one. At least Freesync seems to be working, but frame pacing seems to be off as I get slowdowns with camera movement. Didn't happen on modded FSR. Well I don't have 24.8.1 drivers that they recommend because they break Wukong so maybe it will get fixed with driver update but doubt it.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,529 (4.43/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / R9 380 2 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / Corsair CX650M / DQ550ST [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
They should be as hardware-agnostic as possible.
"As possible" is the key. Usually it's not readily possible. Different architectures from different vendors using vastly varying methods prove a real PITA. That's why some games run better on NV, some — on AMD, with RT being generally an AMD's weakspot no matter the generation and game.

However, AMD really don't do enough. FSR from today is worse than DLSS from 3 years ago. AMD FG from today is worse than NV FG from the launch. XeSS is much younger, Intel are much newer to this market, however XeSS looks better than FSR already. Despite all those issues Intel are forced to reckon with lately. AMD are too late for a wake up call. They need a nuke.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
968 (0.21/day)
Location
South-Africa
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)
Cooling Corsair iCUE H115i Elite Capellix 280mm
Memory 32GB G.Skill DDR4 3600Mhz CL18
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 3070 Ti TUF Gaming OC Edition
Storage Sabrent Rocket 1TB M.2
Display(s) Dell S3220DGF
Case Corsair iCUE 4000X
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D2X
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Platinum
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 - Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K70 MK.2 Low-Profile Rapidfire
Software Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (64-bit)
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
83 (1.51/day)
Would you please stop calling the others fanboys. It doesn't help how you look. You don't become more objective in others' eyes.
It's a mental disorder. He posts same link to this YTB video everywhere. Don't feed the troll, just ignore him.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
11,411 (5.50/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2, 4 + 8 TB Seagate Barracuda 3.5"
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
"As possible" is the key. Usually it's not readily possible. Different architectures from different vendors using vastly varying methods prove a real PITA. That's why some games run better on NV, some — on AMD, with RT being generally an AMD's weakspot no matter the generation and game.

However, AMD really don't do enough. FSR from today is worse than DLSS from 3 years ago. AMD FG from today is worse than NV FG from the launch. XeSS is much younger, Intel are much newer to this market, however XeSS looks better than FSR already. Despite all those issues Intel are forced to reckon with lately. AMD are too late for a wake up call. They need a nuke.
I thought I read an article somewhere that with all 3 vendors using some kind of AI core in their current architectures, Microsoft was working on a hardware-detection based global upscaler. It can't come soon enough and put an end to this mess. Although personally, I'd rather just forget that upscaling even exists, and turn down some graphical features instead of using it.
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
312 (0.16/day)
Location
Bulgaria
Processor 6700K
Motherboard M8G
Cooling D15S
Memory 16GB 3k15
Video Card(s) 2070S
Storage 850 Pro
Display(s) U2410
Case Core X2
Audio Device(s) ALC1150
Power Supply Seasonic
Mouse Razer
Keyboard Logitech
Software 21H2
I wont quote anybody and just post it as a general comment.

Stop making excuses on behalf of AMD. They are no longer that struggling company that is on brink of bankruptcy, trying to survive against two giants. Nowadays they are healthy and profitable business and must do a better job. Their fans (i used to be one as well, until they spent billions on share buybacks instead of improving the company and its technologies) should demand and expect better job from them.

When will they abandon the low cost, low efforts approach of just releasing something as open source and leaving it to the developers to implement it well, which almost never happens. Instead of using Nvidia/Intel approach of utilizing the Nvidia's Streamline SDK and continuously refine the upscaling algorithms and models and updating the binaries. When are they going to release a machine learning enhanced version of FSR? FSR continue to shimmer and ghosts and have all kinds of other image quality shortcomings.

AMD wants to win back market share. That wont happen If they continue with the low cost, low efforts approach. Nvidia's market share gains have shown that people are willing to spend more for extra features and good experience. Like i said in another post, competing solely on raster/price is no longer enough.

Look at the state in which Zen5 was released. The infamous "Finewine" technology, i.e. beta drivers.

AMD MUST DO A BETTER JOB! Especially on the software side.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
21,943 (6.01/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Except that AMD's shit is open-source, so no collaboration is needed. This is entirely on the game devs as far as I see it.
Bingo, and that's exactly why it ain't working out.

I'm saying this strategy does not work for AMD, and in the end, AMD is the company wasting time and energy on this, with a certain purpose. Its purpose is obviously to sell GPUs.
So that's all on AMD. As is their marketing overall. They suck hard at it.

Cyberpunk 2077 after v2.0 is a pure masterpiece and no matter how hard of an AMD fanboy you are, you should probably give it a shot. One of the biggest turnarounds ever in PC gaming.
What's so radically different to you, after 2.0 then? In my experience... the city's still lifeless and empty (okay, assets move around in it, but interaction zero), traffic is still prone to randomly crashing if you turn around, and let's not get started about police behaviour, that's probably even more hilarious... The missions are the same as before... the crafting and economy systems of the game are still broken AF, the new talent trees are a good addition though. That's really the only radical change I could say has truly made the game (somewhat) better. But even now, there's not really any semblance of balance, between talent trees or weapon types; or relative to the enemies you meet. I also can't truly say the combat's improved in the way it works or flows; you can still do mostly whatever and succeed...

Alongside that, numerous bugs still happen, and sure, a lot can be written off as 'oh its fun in the sandbox' but I wouldn't directly say it oozes quality and polish. And masterpiece... eh, just no. There's barely a game and there's a bunch of story missions in a city. That's about as far as Cyberpunk managed to go. It should have been so much more. And I tried, I really, really tried to find the game here, the thing that keeps you going back, but apart from the pretty pictures (in some places... Night City still also has a lot of deserted, unfinished alleys and whole districts even, and no, that's not for its immersive qualities) I don't find it, even after trying all sorts of builds and playstyles. A lot of features and skills for example, (cyberhacks especially, but lots of (smart-) guns too) just simply don't work well, either situationally or at all. Nothing changed here between 1.21 and 2.0.

CP2077 is more or less an Nvidia Demo all those years. I doubt AMD can give enough money to CDPR to convince them to optimize for AMD in the same way they optimize for Nvidia.


But I do agree in this part. It's just that, in my opinion, AMD can't have much of a saying in CP2077 because it is Nvidia's game.
Oh yeah, sure, an Nvidia game that also appears on every console where it uses AMD technology. Come on dude. What bags of money, they're bloody releasing the vast majority of sales on AMD hardware.

The fact Nvidia has pushed RT doesn't mean AMD can't push its upscale proper. Its IN THE GAME. As in, devs DID implement the technology. Of COURSE AMD is next in line to tell them they need to do it properly! And if they don't, AMD should have sent an engineer that way to do it for them - something Nvidia is keen to do, by the way, and has been doing, for decades. Its not just bags of money here, its dedicated investment of time and workforce. Its way too easy to keep saying 'devs fault' in this space. Collaboration doesn't work that way, as evident.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,529 (4.43/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / R9 380 2 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / Corsair CX650M / DQ550ST [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
I'd rather just forget that upscaling even exists, and turn down some graphical features instead of using it.
I'm quite the opposite. Upscaling is a useful tool that should never be avoided. Making games unplayable without it is foul but making games without it altogether is a bigger foul.

My GPU is dated and could've been top tier maybe seven years ago but now it's just a last gen mid-tier unit that's barely suitable for next-gen 1080p. However, with upscaling, it's possible to have it playable at 4K, also having more image quality than at native 1080p. At a conservative performance cost (approx. 85 FPS at 1080p native VS 65 FPS at 4K with XeSS Performance), too.

Image quality damage from upscaling has become almost negligible and it's far less damage than when lowering the "basic" settings. I see no reason to prefer lower settings over upscaling, unless upscaling isn't present or is poorly implemented.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
21,943 (6.01/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
CP2077 is more or less an Nvidia Demo all those years. I doubt AMD can give enough money to CDPR to convince them to optimize for AMD in the same way they optimize for Nvidia.


But I do agree in this part. It's just that, in my opinion, AMD can't have much of a saying in CP2077 because it is Nvidia's game.
Oh yeah, sure, an Nvidia game that also appears on every console where it uses AMD technology. Come on dude. What bags of money, they're bloody releasing the vast majority of sales on AMD hardware.
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,103 (1.28/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
A few months delay of implementing DLSS in Starfield.
Tech press, users, fans, trolls the whole universe revolts against bad AMD.
When you reduce the entire fisaco into those two cherry picked sentences it sure sounds horrible for poor AMD :(
I don't think I'll ever understand why frame generation is a thing. It's useless at high FPS, and unusable at low FPS.
Honestly I've been really enjoying LSFG for the cases where it can make the biggest difference, and those situations so far are mostly fixed framerate content, be it game or video. 24/30/60 fps hard capped content imo it works a treat given the fps is locked anyway you mostly just gain the motion fluidity with less perceived drawback. I can also appreciate it costs money and that might be a nope for people, but it is only 7 bucks. It has it's place, I'd rather have it in the toolset and not want to use it, than want to use it and not have it, and it's hardware agnostic.
no collaboration is needed.
It might help though
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
160 (0.04/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800x3D
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Gaming X v2
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x32GB 3600Mhz C18
Video Card(s) XFX RX 6800 XT Merc 319
Storage Kingston KC2500 2TB NVMe + Crucial MX100 256GB + Samsung 860QVO 1TB + Samsung Spinpoint F3 500GB HDD
Display(s) Samsung CJG5 27" 144 Hz QHD
Case Phanteks Eclipse P360A DRGB Black + 3x Thermalright TL-C12C-S ARGB
Audio Device(s) Logitech X530 5.1 + Logitech G35 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Cougar GEX850 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Viper 8K
Keyboard Logitech G105
Just tested 2.13 patch. Both FSR3 and FG works on 6800XT with Win10. That's being said, I wasnt really impressed.

FSR3 mostly gets rid off ghosting behind the cars compared to FSR2 but it's not perfect. It still has excessive shimmering on vegetation while standing still. It looks good otherwise but I'd rather use XeSS 1.3 as it does better job on both of those scenarios.

FSR FG was initially really bad. Motion fluidity was horrible. But after playing with resolutions and video options it fixed itself. My best guess is Vsync was stuck as on after patching and turned off again by playing with video settings. 6800XT, FSR Balanced 1440p, RT Ultra plays mostly 100+FPS with FG on. But honestly, I really dont see or feel any difference after AFMF2. And I have to use FSR3 for FSR FG. Cant use Xess 1.3 with it unlike with AFMF2. I guess I'll stay on AFMF2+XeSS 1.3.

Fun fact, you use AFMF2 over FSR FG and they both work. :laugh:
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,529 (4.43/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / R9 380 2 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / Corsair CX650M / DQ550ST [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
Fun fact, you use AFMF2 over FSR FG and they both work.
94 percent frames are fake brrrrrrrrrrrtttttttttt!

Both XeSS and FSR are a horrid mess at 1440p if you do Balanced though. Great at 4K (however, I need something faster than 6700 XT to run it with RT ON).
FSR3 mostly gets rid off ghosting behind the cars compared to FSR2 but it's not perfect.
Does it work any faster though?
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
2,149 (0.32/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 5013 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.Ca.
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 32GB GSkill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T (B-Die)
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 7900 XTX Magnetic Air (24.8.1)
Storage WD SN850X 2TB / Corsair MP600 1TB / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 20TB
Display(s) LG 34GP83A-B 34 Inch 21: 9 UltraGear Curved QHD (3440 x 1440) 1ms Nano IPS 160Hz
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500 + HS80 Wireless
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB SE
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 22H2
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/2dey9c 5800X3D https://valid.x86.fr/b7d
AMD being AMD i guess, it works fine on my 4070 Ti.
I have a mobile 3080 in my work laptop and its still available there.

So basically windows 10 = no HAGS And windows 11 HAGS works for Radeons.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
3,257 (1.58/day)
Location
UK, Midlands
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-9
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
We waited a year for this, and it seems like someone just pushed the in-development branch to production.

We got FSR3.0, which is just 2.2 + framegen.
Even like that, using FSR3.0 in game looks much worse than FSR2.2, which is somehow still available. The image is much more unstable.
NativeAA looks worse than DLSS performance.
And to top it off, framegen is enforced to run only on 3.0, when even in that version it was possible to decouple it, something the mods have been doing for months.

All in all, the real star of the show is XeSS1.3 being lighter and closer in quality to DLSS, what CDPR did to implement FSR is an utter joke.
Hopefully the modding community solves it, the .dll files are there.
Is FSR usually closer to DLSS? I read an article not long ago, I cant remember where sadly, but if I find it again will link it, someone was doing testing on all of the upscaling tech's and the person commented that XeSS has got remarkably close to DLSS, comparable visuals with 4% less frame rate impact whilst FSR they felt was a gen or two behind on it.

I think I came across it when looking up info on PSSR.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
160 (0.04/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800x3D
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Gaming X v2
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x32GB 3600Mhz C18
Video Card(s) XFX RX 6800 XT Merc 319
Storage Kingston KC2500 2TB NVMe + Crucial MX100 256GB + Samsung 860QVO 1TB + Samsung Spinpoint F3 500GB HDD
Display(s) Samsung CJG5 27" 144 Hz QHD
Case Phanteks Eclipse P360A DRGB Black + 3x Thermalright TL-C12C-S ARGB
Audio Device(s) Logitech X530 5.1 + Logitech G35 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Cougar GEX850 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Viper 8K
Keyboard Logitech G105
94 percent frames are fake brrrrrrrrrrrtttttttttt!
we are hitting fakeness levels that shouldnt even be possible!

Both XeSS and FSR are a horrid mess at 1440p if you do Balanced though. Great at 4K (however, I need something faster than 6700 XT to run it with RT ON).
Agree. I normally target 120+FPS without RT and SSR in this game as I enjoy that fluidity over visuals (it's still a FPS afterall). But I'm mostly done with the game anyway so it doesnt hurt exploring high fidelity. Still I cant really do more than sightseeing if its under 60 FPS so I have to do with Balanced upscaling. At least AFMF2 is now helping on that.

Does it work any faster though?
Tested shortly on a roof viewing mostly static area. Not a single frame difference between FSR2 and 3. XeSS 1.3 does give higher frame rates though. Could be a bug. Although I have no running mods on 2.13, my game files are quite old and a bit of a mess. I might be running different XeSS .dll.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,529 (4.43/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / R9 380 2 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / Corsair CX650M / DQ550ST [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
Is FSR usually closer to DLSS?
No way. One gotta be blind to see no difference. FSR is at least 3.5 years behind.
I normally target 120+FPS
Wish I had a monitor that can do more than 60 FPS. Will prolly reinvent gaming for myself when I get a 144+ Hz one. It will wait though since I'm allergic to resolutions lower than 4K.

And the game is first person, yes, but it's not strictly a shooter. Rather an action-packed adventure.
XeSS 1.3 does give higher frame rates though
The opposite here. I'm having XeSS slower than FSR but holy drone, is it miles ahead of the latter in terms of clarity.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
160 (0.04/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800x3D
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Gaming X v2
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x32GB 3600Mhz C18
Video Card(s) XFX RX 6800 XT Merc 319
Storage Kingston KC2500 2TB NVMe + Crucial MX100 256GB + Samsung 860QVO 1TB + Samsung Spinpoint F3 500GB HDD
Display(s) Samsung CJG5 27" 144 Hz QHD
Case Phanteks Eclipse P360A DRGB Black + 3x Thermalright TL-C12C-S ARGB
Audio Device(s) Logitech X530 5.1 + Logitech G35 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Cougar GEX850 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Viper 8K
Keyboard Logitech G105
The opposite here. I'm having XeSS slower than FSR but holy drone, is it miles ahead of the latter in terms of clarity.
You sure you are using XeSS 1.3? (Either with patch or by changing .dlls) Then maybe my version is really broken. :laugh:
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,529 (4.43/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / R9 380 2 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / Corsair CX650M / DQ550ST [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
sure you are using XeSS 1.3
I'm sure I'm not. I'm using 1.3.1. 1.3 was my poison before that and it ran slower than FSR, too.

1726242702352.png

1726242760623.png
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
160 (0.04/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800x3D
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Gaming X v2
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x32GB 3600Mhz C18
Video Card(s) XFX RX 6800 XT Merc 319
Storage Kingston KC2500 2TB NVMe + Crucial MX100 256GB + Samsung 860QVO 1TB + Samsung Spinpoint F3 500GB HDD
Display(s) Samsung CJG5 27" 144 Hz QHD
Case Phanteks Eclipse P360A DRGB Black + 3x Thermalright TL-C12C-S ARGB
Audio Device(s) Logitech X530 5.1 + Logitech G35 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Cougar GEX850 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Viper 8K
Keyboard Logitech G105
I'm sure I'm not. I'm using 1.3.1. 1.3 was my poison before that and it ran slower than FSR, too.


I guess my files are beyond saving. Checked my Xess dll, it was on 1.30. Updated to 1.31. I still get higher numbers on XeSS. These are all on 1440p, RT Ultra (preset), Balanced mode for upscalers. (Arent they are all the same scaling at the same preset now?) I'll try a clean install. Thinking my FSR results are broken.

Cyberpunk 2077_2024.09.13-19.28.png
Cyberpunk 2077_2024.09.13-19.28_1.png
Cyberpunk 2077_2024.09.13-19.28_2.png
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
2,529 (4.43/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name DLSS / YOLO-PC
Processor i5-12400F / 10600KF
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D
Cooling Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT / R9 380 2 GB
Storage A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD
Display(s) Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2
Case Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special
Audio Device(s) Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W / Corsair CX650M / DQ550ST [backup]
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 10 and 11
I still get higher numbers on XeSS.
Probably because its Balanced mode is now 50% render, whereas FSR renders things at 59 percent at the Balanced mode.

That's why I compared via setting the scaling ratio manually. Still, too odd even if my assumption on 50/59 is true.
 
Top