• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Does the reduced 8g vram of a770 matter?

Joined
Aug 29, 2024
Messages
62 (0.19/day)
Location
Shanghai
System Name UESTC_404
Processor AMD R9 7950x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650E Aorus Elite X Ax Ice
Cooling Deepcool AG620 digital
Memory Asgard ValkyrieII 6800c34->6400 16g*2
Video Card(s) Yeston 7900xt SAKURA SUGAR
Storage Zhitai TiPlus7100 1T
Case RANDOMLY PICKED TRASHBIN
Power Supply Thermalright TGFX850W
I've bought an Gunnir A770 flux with 8gb vram with 223$ for 1440p gaming/daily routine using, and sometimes I do some video editing works. So, does the 8gb version performs significantly less powerful than the 16gb version?
There's Gunnir A770 photon 16g, but I don't like the appearance of photon series
 
Last edited:
I have both the 16gb and 8gb variant, for 2k res it might be a bit of a squeeze depending on the game. Same with video editing, though that is going to depends on size. Though really atleast with the editing I do it will try to use as much vram it can get just to buffer.

Really though I would try to get the vram if you can.
 
In 99+ % games out here, you'll see basically no difference, usually a little less texture quality loss and better 1% lows on the 16 GB version but nothing all too crazy. Some VRAM hogs like Resident Evil remakes and Hogwarts Legacy will be a lot smoother and more playable on the 16 GB version. Overall, not a big deal.

Likely to punish you in professional use. AI, LLM, render, all that stuff loves VRAM and 8 GB is clearly not enough for that.
 
I have both the 16gb and 8gb variant, for 2k res it might be a bit of a squeeze depending on the game. Same with video editing, though that is going to depends on size. Though really atleast with the editing I do it will try to use as much vram it can get just to buffer.

Really though I would try to get the vram if you can.
I've heard from the shop I bought the card that the 16gb version of a770 has stopped being produced, so maybe there will not be any 16g&flux a770. It's sad.

In 99+ % games out here, you'll see basically no difference, usually a little less texture quality loss and better 1% lows on the 16 GB version but nothing all too crazy. Some VRAM hogs like Resident Evil remakes and Hogwarts Legacy will be a lot smoother and more playable on the 16 GB version. Overall, not a big deal.

Likely to punish you in professional use. AI, LLM, render, all that stuff loves VRAM and 8 GB is clearly not enough for that.
I've tried to use AI&LLM on my Rx6750gre&7900xt by using ROCm on linux, and my personal experience is extremely terrible, so possibly I won't try it on A770
 
I've heard from the shop I bought the card that the 16gb version of a770 has stopped being produced, so maybe there will not be any 16g&flux a770. It's sad.

I mean the Intel founder cards yes. They dont make them. but you can get other OEM cards in 16gb.
 
I mean the Intel founder cards yes. They dont make them. but you can get other OEM cards in 16gb.
Well, as long as there's an 16gb version of FLUX, I'll got it, if the 8gb version performs well in my daily using!
 
Well, as long as there's an 16gb version of FLUX, I'll got it, if the 8gb version performs well in my daily using!

yeah the flux is tough, the photon is the easier one to get from gunnir.

Edit:: You might want to look at sparkle! You might like some of those designs and it would be easier to get a 16gb depending on location.
 
Like others have said, in most games, including older games and indie games, there shouldn't be a difference. But for a few of those new AAA games, it will make a difference.

Infact it could be the difference between playable vs unplayable as some ps5 ports are HUGE vram hogs, even at low resolutions, and even with settings turned down. Probably a legacy of the ps5 having only vram (well actually not true they have 512mb of dram, but I think thats reserved for OS stuff), and then their pc port equivalents, putting stuff that could have gone into system memory into vram. Sometimes these games are patched over time to work better with 8gb cards, but thats not a guarantee, or its done lazily by simply flushing the buffer, which can lead to things like missing textures.

I'm playing ff16 right now, and they went and put a rtx 2080, an 8gb card on their recommended specs. I really wish they would have put at least a 12GB card there. The game gobbles up an insane amount of vram. Well its hard to say for sure since the reports vary so wildly. Some people on 4060s and 3060 tis tell me its runs fine. But many tell me it doesn't. Even people with 4080s complain of performance problems. Its hard to square all the contradictory reports out there. With my 4090 I can see vram go over 15GB. But I have 24gb, so whether this is smart caching of things for faster loading, or irresponsible use of resources, I can't really say.

Anyway, to get back on point, there will likely be times that 8gb causes you problems. However for old, indie, or even new but lighter AAA games it should be okay. I can for example maybe think of 10 games off the top of my head that would give you problems. If you do start bumping into the limit there are a few things you can do to mitigate the impact. 1) upscaling 2) reducing settings, most importantly, textures.

I really don't like to reccomend 8gb cards anymore though. I mean. My 1070 was 8gb. And I bought that in 2016. It wasn't even a high end card. It was like $350. If you would have asked before buying I really would have pushed to get the 16GB version (well, depending on your workload) but I suppose whats done is done. And that doesn't mean your card is useless, you still have tools to lower vram use if a game uses a lot of it. And depending on the games you play, it might not end up mattering. Really depends on the game.

Don't forget to use upscaling! Xess is actually quite good, if thats not avaliable, you'll have to do with fsr, but even that is getting better. GL.
 
Last edited:
I've bought an Gunnir A770 flux with 8gb vram with 223$ for 1440p gaming/daily routine using, and sometimes I do some video editing works. So, does the 8gb version performs significantly less powerful than the 16gb version?
There's Gunnir A770 photon 16g, but I don't like the appearance of photon series
My first Arc A770 that I got in 2023, is 8 GB. (My ASRock Phantom Gaming)

The Sparkle that I got in late-2023, is 16 GB.
 
yeah the flux is tough, the photon is the easier one to get from gunnir.

Edit:: You might want to look at sparkle! You might like some of those designs and it would be easier to get a 16gb depending on location.
Yesyes, I definetely like the sparkle roc a770 16g for it's fluent white design!

Like others have said, in most games, including older games and indie games, there shouldn't be a difference. But for a few of those new AAA games, it will make a difference.

Infact it could be the difference between playable vs unplayable as some ps5 ports are HUGE vram hogs, even at low resolutions, and even with settings turned down. Probably a legacy of the ps5 having only vram, and then their pc port equivalents, putting stuff that could have gone into system memory into vram. Sometimes these games are patched over time to work better with 8gb cards, but thats not a guarantee, or its done lazily by simply flushing the buffer, which can lead to things like missing textures.

I'm playing ff16 right now, and they went and put a rtx 2080, an 8gb card on their recommended specs. I really wish they would have put at least a 12GB card there. The game gobbles up an insane amount of vram. Well its hard to say for sure since the reports vary so wildly. Some people on 4060s and 3060 tis tell me its runs fine. But many tell me it doesn't. Even people with 4080s complain of performance problems. Its hard to square all the contradictory reports out there. With my 4090 I can see vram go over 15GB. But I have 24gb, so whether this is smart caching of things for faster loading, or irresponsible use of resources, I can't really say.

Anyway, to get back on point, there will likely be times that 8gb causes you problems. However for old, indie, or even new but lighter AAA games it should be okay. I can for example maybe think of 10 games off the top of my head that would give you problems. If you do start bumping into the limit there are a few things you can do to mitigate the impact. 1) upscaling 2) reducing settings, most importantly, textures.

I really don't like to reccomend 8gb cards anymore though. I mean. My 1070 was 8gb. And I bought that in 2016. It wasn't even a high end card. It was like $350. If you would have asked before buying I really would have pushed to get the 16GB version (well, depending on your workload) but I suppose whats done is done. And that doesn't mean your card is useless, you still have tools to lower vram use if a game uses a lot of it. And depending on the games you play, it might not end up mattering. Really depends on the game.

Don't forget to use upscaling! Xess is actually quite good, if thats not avaliable, you'll have to do with fsr, but even that is getting better. GL.
Once I got the card I'll try Xess immediately when playing AAA games!
Meanwhile, if there's a game consuming a crazy amount of vram, I'd like to blame the developer of it
 
Yesyes, I definetely like the sparkle roc a770 16g for it's fluent white design!


Once I got the card I'll try Xess immediately when playing AAA games!
Meanwhile, if there's a game consuming a crazy amount of vram, I'd like to blame the developer of it

And many times it is a developer problem. But hardware can't stand still for a decade while games move forward. Its time for cards to move away from 8gb. Except for perhaps the very bottom rung, but those don't even really exist anymore. I'm talking cards like the 3050.
 
And many times it is a developer problem. But hardware can't stand still for a decade while games move forward. Its time for cards to move away from 8gb. Except for perhaps the very bottom rung, but those don't even really exist anymore. I'm talking cards like the 3050.
Can't agree more!
 
And many times it is a developer problem. But hardware can't stand still for a decade while games move forward. Its time for cards to move away from 8gb. Except for perhaps the very bottom rung, but those don't even really exist anymore. I'm talking cards like the 3050.

Agree with this.

In the older days, games would crash if you ran out of space to place assets, now modern engines (especially UE) all the rage is streamable assets, automatic management of resources etc. which in my opinion has led to less efforts in this area. We have seen on occasion perhaps when there is bad publicity (bad DF review), or a very high amount of complaints, devs might do some optimisation and then suddenly VRAM requirements drop considerably, of course only some games get these fixes, it is a mess as its a combination of developers not having time or wanting to bother with optimising their games more, and hardware vendors like Nvidia trying to avoid making their stuff too future proof. This has always been the way, new hardware comes, and it still gets chewed up for breakfast.

Kind of like comparing software frameworks to the pre framework era.
 
Depends on the prices in you region, imho. Where I'm at you can get an A750 8GB for $240, but A770 16GB costs $370+ and that's if you're lucky. That's a wild amount to pay for extra 8 gigs and 10% of performance (for gaming). If you're willing to shop used then yeah by all means get a 16GB A770 because prices are much more compressed there.
 
Depends on the prices in you region, imho. Where I'm at you can get an A750 8GB for $240, but A770 16GB costs $370+ and that's if you're lucky. That's a wild amount to pay for extra 8 gigs and 10% of performance (for gaming). If you're willing to shop used then yeah by all means get a 16GB A770 because prices are much more compressed there.
A770 16g is $254, while A750 is$194-211, A770 5g is $224
 
A770 16g is $254, while A750 is$194-211, A770 5g is $224
At those prices 16 gig is a no-brainer imho. For extra 10-20% in price I'd definitely go for it.
 
A770 16g is $254, while A750 is$194-211, A770 5g is $224
For those prices A770 16GB is a good choice.

Meanwhile I'm enjoying the Intel ARC A770 LE 16GB in DaVinci Resolve it's pleasant 4K edits and exports, I do game and all the games I play run very well in 4K
 
For those prices A770 16GB is a good choice.

Meanwhile I'm enjoying the Intel ARC A770 LE 16GB in DaVinci Resolve it's pleasant 4K edits and exports, I do game and all the games I play run very well in 4K
At those prices 16 gig is a no-brainer imho. For extra 10-20% in price I'd definitely go for it.
Well, once gunnir releases the black version of a770 16g flux I'll get it! Currently I love the appearance of black flux so i got an 8gb version, it's too cool to reject
 
Shit, you are lucky. I cannot find a decent priced A770 16gb anywhere here in Canada.
 
Shit, you are lucky. I cannot find a decent priced A770 16gb anywhere here in Canada.
Perhaps drive your car to USA is a good choice. There's no any 4090 in my region, and drive a car doesn't solves any problem
 
Perhaps drive your car to USA is a good choice. There's no any 4090 in my region, and drive a car doesn't solves any problem
yeah i dunno. I aint driving 8+ hrs for a Arc A770
 
No on that card 8gb is plenty for most things cause you will run out of GPU power before you get to the point of 8+gb ever being an issue. the RTX 4060 is 8gb card and tests show that little to no benefit between the 8gb and 16gb version if i remember right.
 
No on that card 8gb is plenty for most things cause you will run out of GPU power before you get to the point of 8+gb ever being an issue. the RTX 4060 is 8gb card and tests show that little to no benefit between the 8gb and 16gb version if i remember right.
Yes this behaviour matches my gameplay experience, it's always 100%, consuming 200w and using about 4gb vram
 
Back
Top