THEBOSS619 (Maestro/Master). Something caught my attention.
I drew my attention in your “Netwtw10.sys” review why I said be200 for “NETwaw16.sys” did not review our product after all wifi 7 .
Netwtw10.sys =ax=wifi6e
NETwaw16.sys=be=wifi7
well “NETwaw16.sys” still advertises the be200 hardware as “Typhoon” when I want to look at the content, even though it is not like you. i am very surprised that the product is still wifi 6e...
wifi 7 is not released.
which intel also stated on its own site that it still works with wifi6e features for be200.
intel ant tool, before running cmd “HwDetection.xml” in “HwDetection.xml” in (be200) “gale” or “gale2” or linux users see the name “GaP2”; I'm not sure what name it is, “intel community” is in someone's share;
ANT tool, Version ANT.01908.23.70.0
(C) 2007-2024 Intel corporation / OEM Tools group. All rights reserved.
Detected hardware: Device Identified by crf_id: 0x0f
SetDeviceFromString: GALE
Intel(R) Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
RF-Kill is Disabled (RF is ON)
ERROR: -ant_isolation is not supported for this HW...
When you shared the information ****************, it caught my attention;
HwDetection.xml“ in ‘<Device name=’TYPHOON” crf_id=“0x02” rf_type=“0x010D” parameter (wifi 6e ax210)
anyway if this “NETwaw16.sys” detects “TYPHOON”; then
“Device name=“TYPHOON” crf_id=“0x0f” rf_type="0x010D”
“C:\ANT>ANT.exe -QueryMCC
ANT tool, Version 22.2000.0.0-05160
(C) 2007-2020 Intel company / OEM Tools group. All rights reserved.
Detected hardware: Intel(R) Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
Error: The read command fails with the following condition: , 256 (starting to find “error.”.
(802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5): 0x0108 (Thunder ac9260 /Jefferson - ac9460, 9461
802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6): 0x010C, 0x010A, 0x010D (Typhoon - ax210, ax1675, Garfield -ax211, ax411, ax1690
802.11be (Wi-Fi 7): x0F08
(Gale Peak) 2))
Intel® Wi-Fi 7 BE200 (Gale Peak 2) : crf_id=0x0f
Intel® Wi-Fi 7 BE201 (Fillmore Peak 2): crf_id=0x10
Intel® Wi-Fi 7 BE202 (Misty Peak 2): crf_id=0x11
<Device name="Fillmore2" crf_id="0x10" rf_type="0x0F08" /> mac_type=? specific value
<Device name="Misty2" crf_id="0x11" rf_type="0x0F08" /> mac_type=? specific value
<Device name="Gale" crf_id="0x0F" rf_type="0x0F08" /> mac_type=? specific value
Could it be a 256 error due to not being able to find the “mac” address as a result?
<MAC name="TYPHOON" mac_type="0x0042"
(Gale Peak 2) mac_type= ???
just my observations. brainstorming without “going crazy” without understanding
)))
SetDeviceFromString: GALE "where does intel query this parameter?"
crazy questions and fantasies in my head
) (reverseengineering)
make it look like ax210 again without losing be200 drive wifi 7 features
))) what do you say boss (THEBOSS619)