Not my point, just this whole fastest gaming CPU moniker that is thrown about every new gen, this is no faster give or take than the 7800x3d or 10-15 other CPU's when tested at 4k with a 4090, no one is buying this to play at 720p or 1080p or with a middle of the road GPU, yes it gets 1-3FPS better than the next 10 CPU's in the 4k list, it's a nothing burger but still people will buy and pay more for with their 4090 or 5090 when released for epeen value, nothing else, most CPUS from the last 3 years can drive a 4090 @4k as you are GPU limited, people just like to have the latest and greatest when in fact it's good CPU and yes miles ahead (AT 720p/1080p!!!) move up to 1440p or 4K and you could literally buy a Ryzen 7600 or 12700k and anything in between and be within 3% difference
It will matter in Stellaris (5s faster than the in the GN bench, > 10s faster in the LTT bench) that means it will also make a difference in HoI4, EU4, CK3, Victoria3 and the other Paradox grand strategy games.
It will matter in Civ 6 turn time so will probably matter in Civ 7 turn time next year.
It matters in sim racing games like ACC, iRacing.
It matters in ARPGS like Path of Exile, Diablo 4, Last Epoch.
It matters in flight sims like MSFS
It matters in MMOs like WOW.
It matters in RTS games like Starcraft 2.
It matters in Factory games like Factorio, Satisfactory etc
The bottom line is that CPU reviews are utter shit for gaming because it is a lot of the same kinds of games with very little actual variety in game types or game engines.
If CPU reviews actually tested a wider variety of games (games that are incredibly popular going by steam charts) then a lot of this 'CPU does not matter at 4K' nonsense would die because it absolutely does for a large number of games. Sure for the latest AAA titles it may not matter but that is only 1 section of the market.