I have. Win2k runs a bit leaner and cleaner than XP. There's also no activation nonsense. With ServicePack4 and DirectX9c, Win2k is a very solid retro gaming OS. 99% of all XP drivers work with Win2k.
Apart from the fact that XP needs more RAM than 2000 even the requirements are similar( XP really needs 128mb otherwise is sluggish) I really don't see the point of win 2000.
2000 was more stable on servers than XP but, that was back in time. Well, XP was not design with server in mind.
The point is, XP with a nice installation and a bit of luck will be more stable and error free than 2000 IMHO.
NTFS issues on win 2000 shown at some point and not sure was ever fixed. As I remember NTFS was implemented in win OS in 2000 version for the first time, but how well was introduced in Win 2000....
Hella more stable than XP. And I guess that I want(ed) just be in the minority since almost everyone used XP. Also more friendly for older systems since it's a bit more lightweight.
Sucked when software developers stopped supporting it so I had to go with XP in daily usage.
Most of the users in that era and where I leaved was in 2 bands: Win 98 and XP for those who had the hardware to run it.
2000 was a rarity, never came with PCs and used mostly on servers. 2000 was far better than 98 or Millennium but, support for normal daily applications including games, was nowhere and was intended for servers.
ME was on the skeleton of 2000 but, very bad coded.
When XP came out the hardware stores had a huge load over their shoulders and XP just sweep it away, the amount of errors compared with 98 was very small and some new issues start when the clients couldn't afford 128 Mb ram so had to run it on 64Mb. The HDDs taking blows form the OS, failure rate increased, caused mostly by overheating. Each and there arms falling off and rattle on the platters. The usual victims Seagate and some Maxtors, Fireball was the one that had endurance and Big Foot to the heat stress. Big Foot resisted well but, was damn slow. Well the amount of of the metal in the wide case acted as a radiator.
Than the RAM went cheaper quiet fast after XP launch and all went normal, 128Mb was a norm now, some drives was still screaming and grinding hard but slowly people jumped to 192Mb. HDDs was resting again, and than some more RAM 256Mb and 512 Mb was often seen. When 1Gb and 2 GB was there the big monster fallout was imminent >>> Vista
Systems screamed : "I want out" but Vista and his acolytes(several OS processes and spyware) was engulfing them fast and "efficient" with each "encouraged" sale by MS . The stench was pungent and nobody is seeing the light...