- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
- Messages
- 7,261 (3.14/day)
- Location
- California
System Name | His & Hers |
---|---|
Processor | R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock |
Motherboard | X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero |
Cooling | Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum |
Memory | Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk |
Video Card(s) | Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090 |
Storage | lots of SSD. |
Display(s) | A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS..... |
Case | 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X |
Audio Device(s) | Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B |
Power Supply | Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero. |
Keyboard | Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro |
It just saddens me to see no competition. XTX is like 23% slower than 4090 in 4K. Now add at least additional 30% for 5090 and you're at XTX being 50% slower. Can AMD really make a comeback next gen? They'd need like 70-80% faster GPU than XTX in order to compete with 6090, while Nvidia will only need to add additional 20-30% on top of 5090 to beat them again. Sad days for dGPU market and our wallets
While 23% slower is true a future AMD card would need to be 30% faster Than the 7900XTX just to slightly edge out the 4090 and then if you look at RT it would have to be nearly 100% faster just to catch up....
Last edited: