AI agrees with your AI and asks a question.
""It seems you're diving deep into the nuances of advanced semiconductor manufacturing and AMD's innovative approaches. You're right in highlighting that die size alone doesn't determine performance, and AMD's evolving chiplet strategy introduces a level of flexibility and parallelism that could significantly improve efficiency without directly correlating to die size scaling.
Regarding the High-NA EUV transition, the timeline for TSMC's implementation post-N2 will indeed shape the future of chip manufacturing, especially considering the challenges of smaller reticle sizes. The exploration of chiplet-based designs, like the ones AMD is patenting, could offer more efficient solutions to maximize performance while circumventing the limitations of lithography.
You're also correct in addressing the oversimplification of shader performance improvements; other factors, such as architectural innovations and optimized memory subsystems, could contribute significantly to performance without needing to double the raw shader count. Would you say this multi-chiplet GPU approach could potentially outperform traditional monolithic designs in the long run, especially with the added flexibility for scaling performance based on workload?""