This version doesn't seem to support rtx50 - no chip/memory type infolast version is 2.61.0
This version doesn't seem to support rtx50 - no chip/memory type infolast version is 2.61.0
So can i get the version 2.61.2 ?This version doesn't seem to support rtx50 - no chip/memory type info
Get 2.62 released todaySo can i get the version 2.61.2 ?
NVIDIA is betting on ray tracing and Blackwell comes with several improvements here. Our results show a several percent smaller performance loss from enabling RT, which definitely helps...
If I may:I have one more question…
Does the RTX5070 have the same fps as the RTX4090 as they have announced?
System Name | - |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 9 5900X |
Motherboard | MSI MEG X570 |
Cooling | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 (4x140 push-pull) |
Memory | 32GB Patriot Steel DDR4 3733 (8GBx4) |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4080 X-trio. |
Storage | Sabrent Rocket-Plus-G 2TB, Crucial P1 1TB, WD 1TB sata. |
Display(s) | LG Ultragear 34G750 nano-IPS 34" utrawide |
Case | Define R6 |
Audio Device(s) | Xfi PCIe |
Power Supply | Fractal Design ION Gold 750W |
Mouse | Razer DeathAdder V2 Mini. |
Keyboard | Logitech K120 |
VR HMD | Er no, pointless. |
Software | Windows 10 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | Timespy - 24522 | Crystalmark - 7100/6900 Seq. & 84/266 QD1 | |
"at the SKU's baseline price of USD $1,999"
Ostensible price of $1999.
Anyone who paid attention to how the pricing for the 4090 went knows how this will go. A tiny number of FEs will be available, sporadically, and everyone else will have to buy 3rd-party cards with tiny overclocks for quite a bit higher price. The threads and trackers for "hope" over getting an FE 4090 is something gamers (and home AI enthusiasts) shouldn't forget nor should tolerate.
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (+PBO 5.4GHz) |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wifi |
Cooling | ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB |
Memory | 2x32GB (64GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal @ 6200MHz 1:1 (30-38-38-30) |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X |
Storage | Crucial T705 4TB (PCIe 5.0) w/ Heatsink + Samsung 990 PRO 2TB (PCIe 4.0) w/ Heatsink |
Display(s) | AORUS FO32U2P 4K QD-OLED 240Hz (DP 2.1 UHBR20 80Gbps) |
Case | CoolerMaster H500M (Mesh) |
Audio Device(s) | AKG N90Q w/ AudioQuest DragonFly Red (USB DAC) |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime TX-1600 Noctua Edition (1600W 80Plus Titanium) ATX 3.1 & PCIe 5.1 |
Mouse | Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT |
Keyboard | Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
=> 100 / 76 = 31.57%I have an issue with this statement in the conclusion. As I go to the "ray tracing" section, I observe the performance loss from ray tracing is nearly identical from that of ray tracing with the 4090, which would directly contradict this statement:
View attachment 383157View attachment 383158
I think you meant to compare 4K RT OFF vs 4K RT ON right ?
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (+PBO 5.4GHz) |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wifi |
Cooling | ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB |
Memory | 2x32GB (64GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal @ 6200MHz 1:1 (30-38-38-30) |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X |
Storage | Crucial T705 4TB (PCIe 5.0) w/ Heatsink + Samsung 990 PRO 2TB (PCIe 4.0) w/ Heatsink |
Display(s) | AORUS FO32U2P 4K QD-OLED 240Hz (DP 2.1 UHBR20 80Gbps) |
Case | CoolerMaster H500M (Mesh) |
Audio Device(s) | AKG N90Q w/ AudioQuest DragonFly Red (USB DAC) |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime TX-1600 Noctua Edition (1600W 80Plus Titanium) ATX 3.1 & PCIe 5.1 |
Mouse | Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT |
Keyboard | Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
Yes, I meant to compare that.
But I also wanted to show the graph for Alan Wake 2 as well, as a concrete example of the loss of performance from ray tracing for the 5090 vs 4090. Its only one example, sure, but it can be seen to be fairly representative of the ray tracing results of the 5090 vs 4090.
Yes, I can't discard the possibility it may get better with new drivers.
But for now at least, rtx 50 series doesn't seem to have significant improvements in ray tracing loss of performance vs 40 series.
System Name | - |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 9 5900X |
Motherboard | MSI MEG X570 |
Cooling | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 (4x140 push-pull) |
Memory | 32GB Patriot Steel DDR4 3733 (8GBx4) |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4080 X-trio. |
Storage | Sabrent Rocket-Plus-G 2TB, Crucial P1 1TB, WD 1TB sata. |
Display(s) | LG Ultragear 34G750 nano-IPS 34" utrawide |
Case | Define R6 |
Audio Device(s) | Xfi PCIe |
Power Supply | Fractal Design ION Gold 750W |
Mouse | Razer DeathAdder V2 Mini. |
Keyboard | Logitech K120 |
VR HMD | Er no, pointless. |
Software | Windows 10 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | Timespy - 24522 | Crystalmark - 7100/6900 Seq. & 84/266 QD1 | |
Well you could use a brit term " Load of Bollox " :-DI did just google that term. Had no idea there were that many references. For the record, I got the phrase from my grandfather. It was his alternate, less harsh and more polite way of saying "bullsh**". Similar to cow-patties but of the moose variety.
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asrock B550 PG Velocita |
Cooling | Thermalright Silver Arrow 130 |
Memory | G.Skill 4000 MHz DDR4 32 GB |
Video Card(s) | XFX Radeon RX 7800XT 16 GB |
Storage | Plextor PX-512M9PEGN 512 GB |
Display(s) | 1920x1200; 100 Hz |
Case | Fractal Design North XL |
Audio Device(s) | SSL2 |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | i've got a shitload of them in 15 years of TPU membership |
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (+PBO 5.4GHz) |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wifi |
Cooling | ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB |
Memory | 2x32GB (64GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal @ 6200MHz 1:1 (30-38-38-30) |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X |
Storage | Crucial T705 4TB (PCIe 5.0) w/ Heatsink + Samsung 990 PRO 2TB (PCIe 4.0) w/ Heatsink |
Display(s) | AORUS FO32U2P 4K QD-OLED 240Hz (DP 2.1 UHBR20 80Gbps) |
Case | CoolerMaster H500M (Mesh) |
Audio Device(s) | AKG N90Q w/ AudioQuest DragonFly Red (USB DAC) |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime TX-1600 Noctua Edition (1600W 80Plus Titanium) ATX 3.1 & PCIe 5.1 |
Mouse | Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT |
Keyboard | Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
I hope to be wrong, but I really doubt we will see a 9080 XT... AMD said they were aiming at Mainstream GPUs with RDNA 4 to gain market share, and we still don't know much about UDNA/RDNA5.In a years timelap i will be waiting for the GeForce RTX 5090 Ultra release in response to the upcoming Radeon 9080 XT eventuality. Back in 2003 i was siting on my FX 5200 and could only dream of FX 5900 Ultra or 9800XT. Eventually in 2005 i've got that FX 5900 (for fun) and it got beaten in Resident Evil 4 by even a low life such as GeForce 6200, not to mention how bad it was smashed by my GF 6600GT. I am talking about 2X to 3X improvement in FPS from FX 5900 to 6600GT. You don't get to see improvements like that these days from high end to mid range.
System Name | Alienware 15 R2, Thinkpad P14s G5 AMD |
---|---|
Processor | i7 6700HQ BGA, Ryzen 8840HS |
Motherboard | HM170, FP8 |
Cooling | Stock Air Cooling with TG Carbonaut, ICD HC Pad |
Memory | HyperX 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, 32GB Crucial DDR5 5600MTs |
Video Card(s) | GTX 980M 8GB, Radeon iGPU 780M |
Storage | P11TB, SN 570 1TB, 850 Evo,HGST HDD, SN740 |
Display(s) | 15.6" FHD, 14" 16:10 Touch |
Case | None |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster Recon 3Di, Realtek with Dolby |
Power Supply | 240W, 65W |
Mouse | Logitech G304/ Lamzu Thorn 4K |
Keyboard | Stock AW keyboard, Stock Lenovo Thinkpad Keyboard, Keychron K8 Pro |
VR HMD | None |
Software | Win 10 22H2, Win 11 23H2 |
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
page 12, some changes to the shader architecture, page 13, gddr7 memory is huge, page 16 changes to rt cores, some require game support but could be good once materialized, page 27 quite a bit of changes to the codecs, page 35, hardware units for dlss 4, and yes, fp4 and int4 on the tensor coresBy the looks of it
System Name | Alienware 15 R2, Thinkpad P14s G5 AMD |
---|---|
Processor | i7 6700HQ BGA, Ryzen 8840HS |
Motherboard | HM170, FP8 |
Cooling | Stock Air Cooling with TG Carbonaut, ICD HC Pad |
Memory | HyperX 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, 32GB Crucial DDR5 5600MTs |
Video Card(s) | GTX 980M 8GB, Radeon iGPU 780M |
Storage | P11TB, SN 570 1TB, 850 Evo,HGST HDD, SN740 |
Display(s) | 15.6" FHD, 14" 16:10 Touch |
Case | None |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster Recon 3Di, Realtek with Dolby |
Power Supply | 240W, 65W |
Mouse | Logitech G304/ Lamzu Thorn 4K |
Keyboard | Stock AW keyboard, Stock Lenovo Thinkpad Keyboard, Keychron K8 Pro |
VR HMD | None |
Software | Win 10 22H2, Win 11 23H2 |
FP32 performance remains marginal for 80 and 70 series Blackwell when compared against Ada and feels barely an upgrade if someone already has a Super version. Even die size for both 4080/5080 is similar and 5070 non Ti has a smaller die size and less dense than 4070. FP32/BF16 was essentially the same that's what confused me.page 12, some changes to the shader architecture, page 13, gddr7 memory is huge, page 16 changes to rt cores, some require game support but could be good once materialized, page 27 quite a bit of changes to the codecs, page 35, hardware units for dlss 4, and yes, fp4 and int4 on the tensor cores