• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition

hardwarefan

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2025
Messages
5 (0.16/day)
NVIDIA is betting on ray tracing and Blackwell comes with several improvements here. Our results show a several percent smaller performance loss from enabling RT, which definitely helps...

I have an issue with this statement in the conclusion. As I go to the "ray tracing" section, I observe the performance loss from ray tracing is nearly identical from that of ray tracing with the 4090, which would directly contradict this statement:

1000006769.png
1000006768.png
 

hardwarefan

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2025
Messages
5 (0.16/day)
I have one more question…
Does the RTX5070 have the same fps as the RTX4090 as they have announced?
If I may:

If, and only if, you use it with multi-frame gen.
Without multi-frame gen, by looking at the specs, and judging also from the comparison of the 5080 to the 4080, it will likely only match the 4070 super.

PD: What a horrendously misleading claim by jensen. Bordering on false advertising.
It should have said:
Multi-frame gen is so powerful, it can even make the 5070 match the 4090.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
507 (0.08/day)
System Name -
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 (4x140 push-pull)
Memory 32GB Patriot Steel DDR4 3733 (8GBx4)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4080 X-trio.
Storage Sabrent Rocket-Plus-G 2TB, Crucial P1 1TB, WD 1TB sata.
Display(s) LG Ultragear 34G750 nano-IPS 34" utrawide
Case Define R6
Audio Device(s) Xfi PCIe
Power Supply Fractal Design ION Gold 750W
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 Mini.
Keyboard Logitech K120
VR HMD Er no, pointless.
Software Windows 10 22H2
Benchmark Scores Timespy - 24522 | Crystalmark - 7100/6900 Seq. & 84/266 QD1 |

SRS

New Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2024
Messages
26 (0.18/day)
"at the SKU's baseline price of USD $1,999"

Ostensible price of $1999.

Anyone who paid attention to how the pricing for the 4090 went knows how this will go. A tiny number of FEs will be available, sporadically, and everyone else will have to buy 3rd-party cards with tiny overclocks for quite a bit higher price. The threads and trackers for "hope" over getting an FE 4090 is something gamers (and home AI enthusiasts) shouldn't forget nor should tolerate.

Screenshot 2025-02-06 at 12.30.04 PM.png


Only $400? What a steal.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2022
Messages
372 (0.43/day)
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (+PBO 5.4GHz)
Motherboard MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wifi
Cooling ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB
Memory 2x32GB (64GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal @ 6200MHz 1:1 (30-38-38-30)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X
Storage Crucial T705 4TB (PCIe 5.0) w/ Heatsink + Samsung 990 PRO 2TB (PCIe 4.0) w/ Heatsink
Display(s) AORUS FO32U2P 4K QD-OLED 240Hz (DP 2.1 UHBR20 80Gbps)
Case CoolerMaster H500M (Mesh)
Audio Device(s) AKG N90Q w/ AudioQuest DragonFly Red (USB DAC)
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-1600 Noctua Edition (1600W 80Plus Titanium) ATX 3.1 & PCIe 5.1
Mouse Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro
Software Windows 10 64-bit
I have an issue with this statement in the conclusion. As I go to the "ray tracing" section, I observe the performance loss from ray tracing is nearly identical from that of ray tracing with the 4090, which would directly contradict this statement:

View attachment 383157View attachment 383158
=> 100 / 76 = 31.57%
=> 60.1 / 44.7 = 34.45%


I think you meant to compare 4K RT OFF vs 4K RT ON right ?

=> 100 / 74 = 35.13%
=> 100 / 76 = 31.57%
1738886959686.png
1738886981179.png



In that case yes, RT is not better on RTX 50s in terms of IPC (at least as of now, maybe it will get better in several months with newer drivers).
 

hardwarefan

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2025
Messages
5 (0.16/day)
I think you meant to compare 4K RT OFF vs 4K RT ON right ?

Yes, I meant to compare that.
But I also wanted to show the graph for Alan Wake 2 as well, as a concrete example of the loss of performance from ray tracing for the 5090 vs 4090. Its only one example, sure, but it can be seen to be fairly representative of the ray tracing results of the 5090 vs 4090.

Yes, I can't discard the possibility it may get better with new drivers.
But for now at least, rtx 50 series doesn't seem to have significant improvements in ray tracing loss of performance vs 40 series.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2022
Messages
372 (0.43/day)
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (+PBO 5.4GHz)
Motherboard MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wifi
Cooling ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB
Memory 2x32GB (64GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal @ 6200MHz 1:1 (30-38-38-30)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X
Storage Crucial T705 4TB (PCIe 5.0) w/ Heatsink + Samsung 990 PRO 2TB (PCIe 4.0) w/ Heatsink
Display(s) AORUS FO32U2P 4K QD-OLED 240Hz (DP 2.1 UHBR20 80Gbps)
Case CoolerMaster H500M (Mesh)
Audio Device(s) AKG N90Q w/ AudioQuest DragonFly Red (USB DAC)
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-1600 Noctua Edition (1600W 80Plus Titanium) ATX 3.1 & PCIe 5.1
Mouse Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Yes, I meant to compare that.
But I also wanted to show the graph for Alan Wake 2 as well, as a concrete example of the loss of performance from ray tracing for the 5090 vs 4090. Its only one example, sure, but it can be seen to be fairly representative of the ray tracing results of the 5090 vs 4090.

Yes, I can't discard the possibility it may get better with new drivers.
But for now at least, rtx 50 series doesn't seem to have significant improvements in ray tracing loss of performance vs 40 series.

I think Blackwell needs a lot more RT/PT improvement(s), Lovelace has gotten better over the past 2 years too, so I wouldn't be surprised if we see more and more games getting closer to 40-50% more performance vs 4090 due to some enhanced RT capabilities + much higher bandwidth use.

We all wish Nvidia went all-in and with a 3nm node for raw performance like they did with Lovelace when it released but they're all betting on AI and huge margins so unless AMD or Intel can really compete, it's not going to happen.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
507 (0.08/day)
System Name -
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 (4x140 push-pull)
Memory 32GB Patriot Steel DDR4 3733 (8GBx4)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4080 X-trio.
Storage Sabrent Rocket-Plus-G 2TB, Crucial P1 1TB, WD 1TB sata.
Display(s) LG Ultragear 34G750 nano-IPS 34" utrawide
Case Define R6
Audio Device(s) Xfi PCIe
Power Supply Fractal Design ION Gold 750W
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 Mini.
Keyboard Logitech K120
VR HMD Er no, pointless.
Software Windows 10 22H2
Benchmark Scores Timespy - 24522 | Crystalmark - 7100/6900 Seq. & 84/266 QD1 |
I did just google that term. Had no idea there were that many references. For the record, I got the phrase from my grandfather. It was his alternate, less harsh and more polite way of saying "bullsh**". Similar to cow-patties but of the moose variety.
Well you could use a brit term " Load of Bollox " :-D
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
780 (0.13/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Motherboard Asrock B550 PG Velocita
Cooling Thermalright Silver Arrow 130
Memory G.Skill 4000 MHz DDR4 32 GB
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 7800XT 16 GB
Storage Plextor PX-512M9PEGN 512 GB
Display(s) 1920x1200; 100 Hz
Case Fractal Design North XL
Audio Device(s) SSL2
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores i've got a shitload of them in 15 years of TPU membership
In a years timelap i will be waiting for the GeForce RTX 5090 Ultra release in response to the upcoming Radeon 9080 XT eventuality. Back in 2003 i was siting on my FX 5200 and could only dream of FX 5900 Ultra or 9800XT. Eventually in 2005 i've got that FX 5900 (for fun) and it got beaten in Resident Evil 4 by even a low life such as GeForce 6200, not to mention how bad it was smashed by my GF 6600GT. I am talking about 2X to 3X improvement in FPS from FX 5900 to 6600GT. You don't get to see improvements like that these days from high end to mid range.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2022
Messages
372 (0.43/day)
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (+PBO 5.4GHz)
Motherboard MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wifi
Cooling ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB
Memory 2x32GB (64GB) G.Skill Trident Z Royal @ 6200MHz 1:1 (30-38-38-30)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X
Storage Crucial T705 4TB (PCIe 5.0) w/ Heatsink + Samsung 990 PRO 2TB (PCIe 4.0) w/ Heatsink
Display(s) AORUS FO32U2P 4K QD-OLED 240Hz (DP 2.1 UHBR20 80Gbps)
Case CoolerMaster H500M (Mesh)
Audio Device(s) AKG N90Q w/ AudioQuest DragonFly Red (USB DAC)
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-1600 Noctua Edition (1600W 80Plus Titanium) ATX 3.1 & PCIe 5.1
Mouse Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro
Software Windows 10 64-bit
In a years timelap i will be waiting for the GeForce RTX 5090 Ultra release in response to the upcoming Radeon 9080 XT eventuality. Back in 2003 i was siting on my FX 5200 and could only dream of FX 5900 Ultra or 9800XT. Eventually in 2005 i've got that FX 5900 (for fun) and it got beaten in Resident Evil 4 by even a low life such as GeForce 6200, not to mention how bad it was smashed by my GF 6600GT. I am talking about 2X to 3X improvement in FPS from FX 5900 to 6600GT. You don't get to see improvements like that these days from high end to mid range.
I hope to be wrong, but I really doubt we will see a 9080 XT... AMD said they were aiming at Mainstream GPUs with RDNA 4 to gain market share, and we still don't know much about UDNA/RDNA5.
Nvidia having 90% Market share, AMD have to make RDNA 4 & UDNA a real bargain. But to get some really huge market share gains (including high-end GPUs), AMD would have to beat the 5090 in raw performance with UDNA next year while having a very compelling performance/price ratio. It would be amazing if it happened but yeah, wait and see!
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2025
Messages
44 (1.07/day)
Location
Morrisville, NC, USA
Based on the following video with der8auer discovering a massive safety hazard where one wire in the 12V-2x6 power cable was carrying over 22 amps causing temperatures to rocket to at least 150 degrees Celsius, I think that TechPowerUp needs to retest its RTX 5090 Founders Edition and possibly revoke the Editor's Choice award if TechPowerUp can replicate the safety hazards:

Buildzoid made a video about this issue below:

After viewing der8auer's video, Buildzoid made a follow-up video below:
 

vgm

Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
81 (0.02/day)
Location
India
System Name Alienware 15 R2, Thinkpad P14s G5 AMD
Processor i7 6700HQ BGA, Ryzen 8840HS
Motherboard HM170, FP8
Cooling Stock Air Cooling with TG Carbonaut, ICD HC Pad
Memory HyperX 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, 32GB Crucial DDR5 5600MTs
Video Card(s) GTX 980M 8GB, Radeon iGPU 780M
Storage P11TB, SN 570 1TB, 850 Evo,HGST HDD, SN740
Display(s) 15.6" FHD, 14" 16:10 Touch
Case None
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Recon 3Di, Realtek with Dolby
Power Supply 240W, 65W
Mouse Logitech G304/ Lamzu Thorn 4K
Keyboard Stock AW keyboard, Stock Lenovo Thinkpad Keyboard, Keychron K8 Pro
VR HMD None
Software Win 10 22H2, Win 11 23H2
@W1zzard Did you get access to architecture comparison with Ampere, Ada and Blackwell. I came across this architecture pdf file when I was searching for CUDA 12.X documentation and SDK for 4070 Super.
By the looks of it, compute wise Blackwell is just AI optimized card with heavy focus on FP4 performance reaching upto 3000 TOPS on 5090. I'm unsure if its actual info or just misinformation through clever manipulation of SEO.

Blackwell Architecture PDF
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
28,345 (3.73/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
By the looks of it
page 12, some changes to the shader architecture, page 13, gddr7 memory is huge, page 16 changes to rt cores, some require game support but could be good once materialized, page 27 quite a bit of changes to the codecs, page 35, hardware units for dlss 4, and yes, fp4 and int4 on the tensor cores
 

vgm

Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
81 (0.02/day)
Location
India
System Name Alienware 15 R2, Thinkpad P14s G5 AMD
Processor i7 6700HQ BGA, Ryzen 8840HS
Motherboard HM170, FP8
Cooling Stock Air Cooling with TG Carbonaut, ICD HC Pad
Memory HyperX 32GB DDR4 3200MHz, 32GB Crucial DDR5 5600MTs
Video Card(s) GTX 980M 8GB, Radeon iGPU 780M
Storage P11TB, SN 570 1TB, 850 Evo,HGST HDD, SN740
Display(s) 15.6" FHD, 14" 16:10 Touch
Case None
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Recon 3Di, Realtek with Dolby
Power Supply 240W, 65W
Mouse Logitech G304/ Lamzu Thorn 4K
Keyboard Stock AW keyboard, Stock Lenovo Thinkpad Keyboard, Keychron K8 Pro
VR HMD None
Software Win 10 22H2, Win 11 23H2
page 12, some changes to the shader architecture, page 13, gddr7 memory is huge, page 16 changes to rt cores, some require game support but could be good once materialized, page 27 quite a bit of changes to the codecs, page 35, hardware units for dlss 4, and yes, fp4 and int4 on the tensor cores
FP32 performance remains marginal for 80 and 70 series Blackwell when compared against Ada and feels barely an upgrade if someone already has a Super version. Even die size for both 4080/5080 is similar and 5070 non Ti has a smaller die size and less dense than 4070. FP32/BF16 was essentially the same that's what confused me.
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2025
Messages
44 (1.07/day)
Location
Morrisville, NC, USA
A new YouTube video alleges that RTX 50 series is bad with DirectX 9:
Could someone cross check to see if the RTX 50 series is bad with DirectX 9? Such a test would be valuable to determine if the YouTuber's allegation is real or if there is something wrong with the YouTuber's setup like a driver installation issue.

We already have had the RTX 50 series remove 32-bit support for CUDA, OpenCL, and PhysX.
 
Last edited:
Top