- Joined
- Jul 31, 2024
- Messages
- 923 (4.44/day)
This is a perfect opportunity for AMD to screw up a perfect opportunity.
They already screwed up. But hey, they can screw it up many times more with the next graphic card release.
This is a perfect opportunity for AMD to screw up a perfect opportunity.
Zotac had nothing to do with this
System Name | Good enough |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge |
Motherboard | ASRock B650 Pro RS |
Cooling | 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30 |
Memory | 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora |
Storage | 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB |
Display(s) | LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV |
Case | Phanteks NV7 |
Power Supply | GPS-750C |
No because those units are not always fused off, that's why in the past you could flash some cards and unlock shaders, because those were never defective or fused off to begin with, so there wouldn't even be a way to probe for disabled shaders. Some defects you also simply cannot probe for as they can cause intermittent issues so there is no reliable way to detect them through software, it would be a very bad idea to rely on something like that.I highly doubt that. The hardware has some mechanism to know itself which ones are defect. I assume those defect areas do not exists anymore because the connections are lasercut in the factory. The firmware just probes the hardware and see it.
Anyway - the firmware needs to be programmed for such a mechanism beforehand. The hardware needs to be prepared for that mechanism beforehand. There is no random we have less rop issue.
for their very high price they present several problems first the 5.0 bus and black screen, then the connectors that melt, in some cases, now even the ROP, it doesn't seem to me that they are worth what they cost
System Name | Mac Pro 2013 |
---|---|
Processor | Xeon 2667v2 |
Motherboard | A collection of mother and daughter boards connected by ribbon cables |
Cooling | Thermal core triangle |
Memory | 64GB ECC DDR3-1866 |
Video Card(s) | Dual FirePro D700 6GB |
Storage | WD NVME 1GB |
Display(s) | ASUS Pro Art 27" |
Case | Apple Cylinder |
And that's my point. There would have to be intentional selling of disabled hardware if you're knowingly shipping a different firmware, unless every single 5090 that went to ZOTAC (and others) has these ROPs disabled, so they didn't know any better. That, or the full-ROP versions are not using some hardware because they are running the defect-edition firmware. It should bear out in the firmware, but it might be really hard to discover (I know I couldn't figure it out). What I'm getting at is that this couldn't be an "oops" in the supply chain if they are knowingly working around the missing ROPs with firmware. Maybe there's just one firmware that does a resource check and adjusts accordingly, so we'd never know.No because those units are not always fused off, that's why in the past you could flash some cards and unlock shaders, because those were never defective or fused off to begin with, so there wouldn't even be a way to probe for disabled shaders. Some defects you also simply cannot probe for as they can cause intermittent issues so there is no reliable way to detect them though software, it would be a very bad idea to rely on something like that.
I don't think you realize how much stuff actually is present on these chips, you're talking about millions of data lines, you simply cannot test everything every time, it's not feasible. It's more reliable to check the GPU die first, detect the defects and configure the firmware.
I don't see news of this in the OP.
Edit- I see it now, they had a Zotac card for review.
I find it weird TPU didn't say anything about the missing ROPs sooner.
System Name | Good enough |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge |
Motherboard | ASRock B650 Pro RS |
Cooling | 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30 |
Memory | 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora |
Storage | 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB |
Display(s) | LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV |
Case | Phanteks NV7 |
Power Supply | GPS-750C |
Of course, Nvidia knows as every wafer is checked optically for defects, that's how they came up with that 0.5% figure, it's not like they made up some statistical estimation, they know exactly how many chips were defective and for what reason.What I'm getting at is that this couldn't be an "oops" in the supply chain
System Name | Homebase |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 5600 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Aorus X570S UD |
Cooling | Scythe Mugen 5 RGB |
Memory | 2*16 Kingston Fury DDR4-3600 double ranked |
Video Card(s) | AMD Radeon RX 6800 16 GB |
Storage | 1*512 WD Red SN700, 1*2TB Curcial P5, 1*2TB Sandisk Plus (TLC), 1*14TB Toshiba MG |
Display(s) | Philips E-line 275E1S |
Case | Fractal Design Torrent Compact |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850 2019 |
Mouse | Sharkoon Sharkforce Pro |
Keyboard | Fujitsu KB955 |
It's only 0.5% for dGPU sold through retailer, but what is the percentage for system builder... I mean how many percent of those customer follow the technews and are able to check for those ROP...Seeing so many pop up in reports it is hard to believe it is only 0.5%.......but since they don't disclose the numbers of shipped GPUs vs. defective ones it is hard to tell.
So now your cards can burn due to “user error”, can face black screens or miss performance targets when you got lucky enough to get one anyway. That's an “epic” launch, but it still benefits the company and the other two are going to screw up again I suppose.....
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
The Zotac review is in progress, I noticed the odd performance and they shipped a second card so that I can compare both, to further debug the issue. We were thinking GPU clock issue, maybe PCIe 5.0, or lanes, or power, or heat.I haven't seen a review for a Zotac RTX 5090 Solid, either TPU didn't publish it yet, or I suspect Nvidia knew about this issue and told reviewers to not say anything about the affected cards.
That won't work .. what about the missing performance?Next driver version will stop reporting real active ROP numbers and just have a define with whatever the number is supposed to be, problem solved.
Thank you for the clarification.The Zotac review is in progress, I noticed the odd performance and they shipped a second card so that I can compare both, to further debug the issue. We were thinking GPU clock issue, maybe PCIe 5.0, or lanes, or power, or heat.
Until yesterday, nobody noticed that ROPs were missing. When I found out I drafted the news post, informed Zotac, asked for a statement and published our story, nothing was held back.
Also @wNotyarD
System Name | RogueOne |
---|---|
Processor | Xeon W9-3495x |
Motherboard | ASUS w790E Sage SE |
Cooling | SilverStone XE360-4677 |
Memory | 128gb Gskill Zeta R5 DDR5 RDIMMs |
Video Card(s) | MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090 |
Storage | 1x 2TB WD SN850X | 2x 8TB GAMMIX S70 |
Display(s) | 49" Philips Evnia OLED (49M2C8900) |
Case | Thermaltake Core P3 Pro Snow |
Audio Device(s) | Moondrop S8's on schitt Gunnr |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime TX-1600 |
Mouse | Razer Viper mini signature edition (mercury white) |
Keyboard | Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Moondrop Luna lights |
VR HMD | Quest 3 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro Workstation |
Benchmark Scores | I dont have time for that. |
This has quickly become a mess of incompetence. This has been pathetic in nearly every respect. From the blatant performance gap from what was OPENLY promised VS what was actually delivered, to the melting power jacks(AGAIN), to the price gouging bullshit and now this revelation about missing specs that should be present and are not.
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
These usual mechanics for cases like this are that merchants or AICs (depending on local laws) collect the defective cards and replace or refund. The GPUs go back to NV and AICs get credit for them. This is what happens with RMAs as well. Any component returned will be repurposed, all these companies have staff and equipment to repurpose components, nothing goes to wasteI wonder how Nvidia is actually going to fix this or are the AIBs going to be left dealing with customers.
5090? I shouldn't have to tell you this, but I'll say it for everyone else reading, make sure all of the pins on that power cable are properly & firmly seated in the jack socket. Be extra careful. There is potential for fire.I already own an arc welder so wifes gonna be pissed. Its a shame from a PCB size standpoint its an amazing feat of engineering.
System Name | Main |
---|---|
Processor | 5700X |
Motherboard | MSI B450M Mortar |
Cooling | Corsair H80i v2 |
Memory | G.SKILL Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600MHz CL16 |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3060 Ti VENTUS 2X OC 8GB GDDR6X |
Display(s) | LG 32GK850G |
Case | NOX HUMMER ZN |
Power Supply | Seasonic GX-750 |
They'll claim temperature constraints or bad airflow in the case, not allowing max boost/throttlingThat won't work .. what about the missing performance?
Processor | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|
Memory | 48 GB |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 |
Storage | 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe |
Display(s) | 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024 |
Software | Windows 10 64-bit |
That might work with end users who have a single card and no experience with professional testing .. they won't ever notice 5-10% missing performance.. not gonna work here when I have a stack of cards of the same SKU that all perform significantly better. Just take out one card, plop in another, numbers won't lieThey'll claim temperature constraints or bad airflow in the case, not allowing max boost/throttling
No. There is a physical defect on the chip itself that does not fit the official spec.They'll claim temperature constraints or bad airflow in the case, not allowing max boost/throttling
System Name | Homebase |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 5600 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Aorus X570S UD |
Cooling | Scythe Mugen 5 RGB |
Memory | 2*16 Kingston Fury DDR4-3600 double ranked |
Video Card(s) | AMD Radeon RX 6800 16 GB |
Storage | 1*512 WD Red SN700, 1*2TB Curcial P5, 1*2TB Sandisk Plus (TLC), 1*14TB Toshiba MG |
Display(s) | Philips E-line 275E1S |
Case | Fractal Design Torrent Compact |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850 2019 |
Mouse | Sharkoon Sharkforce Pro |
Keyboard | Fujitsu KB955 |
That's well organized.The Zotac review is in progress, I noticed the odd performance and they shipped a second card so that I can compare both, to further debug the issue. We were thinking GPU clock issue, maybe PCIe 5.0, or lanes, or power, or heat.
Until yesterday, nobody noticed that ROPs were missing. When I found out I drafted the news post, informed Zotac, asked for a statement and published our story, nothing was held back.
Also @wNotyarD
That won't work .. what about the missing performance?
Processor | Ryzen 3600 / intel i7 11800H |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max / whatever's in razer blade 15 2021 |
Cooling | stock noisy AMD wraith cooler / noisy razer blade fans |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 16GB DDR4-3200MHz / Samsung 16GB DDR4-3200 so dimms |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Nitro RX580 8GBs / nVidia Geforce 3070 mobile |
Storage | Adata Gammix S11 Pro 1TB nvme / Kingston KC3000 2TB |
Display(s) | Gigabyte M32U |
Case | Corsair Caribide Air 540 / Razer Blade 15 2021 laptop |
Mouse | anything with optical switches |
They'd have to be stark raving mad to concede defeat at this point. Even intel, with all its problems. nvidia has been screwing the pooch for multiple generations of product now, either iterative or complete garbage like the current one. Remember when intel was considered invincible, the 1000-pound gorilla that NOONE, noone could be possibly out-R&D and outcompete? We've been fed the line that nvidia could at any moment's notice crush the competition, while all they had in line was the shittiest generation of Geforce since the leafblower thing.I think AMD and Intel really have a chance to close the gap here.. And yes folks I'm an NVidia guy. However I'm not fanboy nor someone whose judgment is less than objective.