• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Aims Higher, 50% Market-share in Discrete-graphics in Sight

Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
4,838 (0.75/day)
System Name Aquarium
Processor Ryzen 9 7950x
Motherboard ROG Strix X670-E
Cooling Lian Li Galahead 360 AIO
Memory 2x16gb Flare X5 Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR5-6000 PC5-48000
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 3060
Storage 2TB WD SN850X Black NVMe, 500GB Samsung 970 NVMe
Display(s) Gigabyte 32" IPS 144Hz
Case Hyte Y60
Power Supply Corsair RMx 850
Software Win 11 Pro/ PopOS!

Crysis is optimized for nvidia, and will always favor them in charts, and given that chart I'm not even so sure they would. Tri-sli isn't gonna scale very well, that may be just about equal going off that.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
1,365 (0.23/day)
Location
Alden, NY
System Name Turbo_Fighter/Pitbull
Processor AMD FX-9590/Intel i7 6700K 4.7GHZ @ 1.41 volts
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 Rev 4.0/Gigabyte GA-Z170N-Gaming 5
Cooling Corsair H105/Corsair H100iv2
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Ares/32 GB G.Skill Trident-Z
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon R9 Fury X/Sapphire R9 Nano
Storage Mix of HDDs SSDs Externals and a 256GB Samsung M.2 in the pitbull
Display(s) 24" Nixeus 144hz freesync/24'' Benq XL2420TE/21.5'' Asus VH226/Panasonic 42" Plasma
Case White Phantom NZXT/Fractal Define Nano S
Audio Device(s) MayFlower O2 ODAC/HT Omega Claro+/Turtlebeach Earforce DSS
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i/Thermaltake Smart 650Watt(EVGA GS 650 Watt took a shit on me)
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Corsair K70
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores They can run Crysis.
Even with ATI being the "underdog", they're allways the topdog in my book for the quality, but now they're pushing quantity of those quality frames, go ATI and AMD
 

GPUCafe

GPU Cafe Representative
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
50 (0.01/day)
Crysis is optimized for nvidia, and will always favor them in charts, and given that chart I'm not even so sure they would. Tri-sli isn't gonna scale very well, that may be just about equal going off that.
I think its the other way, SLI is optimized for Crysis. :p

The definition of the fastest setup depends on so many variables, so either camp wont be technically wrong in claiming the crown.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,244 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
850 (0.13/day)
Location
USA
Because it does. Look, I am not an Nvidia fan. But when it comes to single-GPU performance Nvidia wins. The ATI 4870X2 is faster, but look at the amount of power it uses.

I don't know in wich country you live in, but where I live electricity is not cheap. If you own the 4870X2 for a year or more, then the Nvidia GTX280 is a lot cheaper, a lot.
For a single GPU solution yes Nvidia wins. BUT for a single CARD solution ATI wins. That is all people are saying. That can not be argued with at this time. The 4870x2 right now is THE fastest card.
They don't even need to claim it -- they have legions of zealots to do it for them. :shadedshu
Don't start it can be said the same for both sides. I am an NV fan and they aren't the fastest right now.

ON TOPIC
I didn't realize ATI's new chipset was that good. I mean I heard good things about its possibilities.
Makes me happy. AMD needs to start being more competitive in the market (market share).
 

Weer

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
1,417 (0.22/day)
Location
New York / Israel
System Name //////////////////////////////////////Crunching/Folding Builds\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Processor Q8400@ 4.0Ghz | Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz | E7300 @ 3.8Ghz | E5300 @ 4.3Ghz | E5300 @ 3.9Ghz | E2180 @ 2.0Ghz |
Motherboard ASUS P5Q-E | Asus P5Q Pro | Gigabyte EG45-DS2H | Gigabyte EP35-DS3H | Gigabyte NV73 | E-Sonic P35-G
Cooling TRUE [Lapped] | TRUE | Thermalright SI-128 | Stock | Stock | Stock
Memory G.Skill 8192MB @ 1066Mhz | G.Skill 4096MB | OCZ 2048MB | G.Skill 2048MB | PNY 2048MB | OCZ 1024MB
Video Card(s) GTX 280 + 8800 GTS 512 | 9800 GX2 + 8800 GTS 512 | 6600 GT | 8800 GS | 9600 GSO 512
Storage G.Skill 64GB SSD (OS) | Segate 750GB [Downloads] | 5TB JBOD [Movies] | 3TB JBOD [Else] | 1.5TB [Ex]
Display(s) QUAD Monitors: Dell 2007FP [20"] + Dell 3007WFP-HC [30"] + Dell 2007FP [20"] | Dell 2407WFP-HC [24"]
Case Antec P190 | Antec Three-Hundred | Antec NSK2400 | Thermaltake Strike MX | HEC 6T10 | HEC 8K01
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer PCI + [Audiophile HD600] + [Creative G500 + Logitech X-530 = 10 speakers]
Power Supply OCZ 750w [62A] | OCZ 750w [62A] | Antec 380w [31A] | Antec 650w [54A] | OCZ 400w [33A] | GeN [20A]
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit + Windows XP 64-bit | Windows Vista SP2 64-bit | Windows 7 RTM 64-bit
Benchmark Scores ////////////////////////////////66,666 [Crunching] + 45,455 [Folding]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
OK...I was...wrong. GTX 280 x3 is chopped. NVIDIA is talking crap.

Don't give up so easily. That review has mostly wrong figures, such as 260 SLi beating 280 SLi, and nVidia has the edge in Crysis so they technically still win. Although, yeah, AMD has placed 800 ALU's on a single GPU.. obviously they're going to win some battles. They did what they had to in order to win, no matter the manufacturing cost. nVidia could easily knock them out again, and they very likely will. I wouldn't be against AMD, if only their architecture wasn't so dated and they would finally move to Scalar. But this competition is great. I just think that nVidia fanboys want nVidia to come out a head a little bit.
 

Weer

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
1,417 (0.22/day)
Location
New York / Israel
System Name //////////////////////////////////////Crunching/Folding Builds\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Processor Q8400@ 4.0Ghz | Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz | E7300 @ 3.8Ghz | E5300 @ 4.3Ghz | E5300 @ 3.9Ghz | E2180 @ 2.0Ghz |
Motherboard ASUS P5Q-E | Asus P5Q Pro | Gigabyte EG45-DS2H | Gigabyte EP35-DS3H | Gigabyte NV73 | E-Sonic P35-G
Cooling TRUE [Lapped] | TRUE | Thermalright SI-128 | Stock | Stock | Stock
Memory G.Skill 8192MB @ 1066Mhz | G.Skill 4096MB | OCZ 2048MB | G.Skill 2048MB | PNY 2048MB | OCZ 1024MB
Video Card(s) GTX 280 + 8800 GTS 512 | 9800 GX2 + 8800 GTS 512 | 6600 GT | 8800 GS | 9600 GSO 512
Storage G.Skill 64GB SSD (OS) | Segate 750GB [Downloads] | 5TB JBOD [Movies] | 3TB JBOD [Else] | 1.5TB [Ex]
Display(s) QUAD Monitors: Dell 2007FP [20"] + Dell 3007WFP-HC [30"] + Dell 2007FP [20"] | Dell 2407WFP-HC [24"]
Case Antec P190 | Antec Three-Hundred | Antec NSK2400 | Thermaltake Strike MX | HEC 6T10 | HEC 8K01
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer PCI + [Audiophile HD600] + [Creative G500 + Logitech X-530 = 10 speakers]
Power Supply OCZ 750w [62A] | OCZ 750w [62A] | Antec 380w [31A] | Antec 650w [54A] | OCZ 400w [33A] | GeN [20A]
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit + Windows XP 64-bit | Windows Vista SP2 64-bit | Windows 7 RTM 64-bit
Benchmark Scores ////////////////////////////////66,666 [Crunching] + 45,455 [Folding]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
7,662 (1.20/day)
Location
c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Processor C2Q6600 @ 1.6 GHz
Motherboard Anus PQ5
Cooling ACFPro
Memory GEiL2 x 1 GB PC2 6400
Video Card(s) MSi 4830 (RIP)
Storage Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320 GB Perpendicular Recording
Display(s) Dell 17'
Case El Cheepo
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Software MCE2K5
What pisses me off the most in this round of gpu battles is, arguments that werent valid when ati was at the bottom, now stand when nvidia is at the bottom, for shame you sensless fanbois
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,244 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Jesus Christ. Where did you find such senseless propoganda?

From Alienware. Please choose your words better. There are better ways to disagree with things.
 

Siman0

New Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
19 (0.00/day)
well if they even come close to actually surpassing the 4870 all DAAMIT has to do is use the extra/expand the die size to the same as Nvidia's; or they could jest increase the bit rate on the GDDR5 or actually clock it up to GDDR5's standards....with the R800 they increased the transistor count vary little so i suspect they are going to either increase the reference clock for the GDDR5 or incense the bit rate
 

waver_01

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
5 (0.00/day)
Don't give up so easily. That review has mostly wrong figures, such as 260 SLi beating 280 SLi, and nVidia has the edge in Crysis so they technically still win. Although, yeah, AMD has placed 800 ALU's on a single GPU.. obviously they're going to win some battles. They did what they had to in order to win, no matter the manufacturing cost. nVidia could easily knock them out again, and they very likely will. I wouldn't be against AMD, if only their architecture wasn't so dated and they would finally move to Scalar. But this competition is great. I just think that nVidia fanboys want nVidia to come out a head a little bit.


your entire post is flawed

That review has mostly wrong figures, such as 260 SLi beating 280 SLi

oh riiight the review is to blame

and nVidia has the edge in Crysis so they technically still win

it's just one game so they dont win AT ALL

I wouldn't be against AMD, if only their architecture wasn't so dated and they would finally move to Scalar.

wow what? outdated?

Rv770 is twice as efficient as GT200 in terms of die size/perf.

They did what they had to in order to win, no matter the manufacturing cost.

manufacturing costs are very low with Rv770 so I dont know what you're trying to say

I just think that nVidia fanboys want nVidia to come out a head a little bit

:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,490 (0.39/day)
Location
Your house.
System Name Jupiter-2
Processor Intel i3-6100
Motherboard H170I-PLUS D3
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB Mushkin DDR3L-1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1050ti
Storage 512GB Corsair SSD
Display(s) BENQ 24in
Case Lian Li PC-Q01B Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 450W
Mouse Logitech Trackball
Keyboard Custom bamboo job
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.
All I've figured out from this whole thing is that there are a LOT of people everywhere that are suddenly very pissed off that ATI now has the fastest card. :twitch:

I mean, come on -- if you're an Nvidia fan, you shouldn't be getting defensive. ATI now has the fastest card, big deal.

It'll change in a few months, and then it'll change back again, and again, and so on and so on until ray-tracing is perfected and graphics have become so realistic-looking that there's no need to advance technology any further.

So, please, Nvidia fans: please be good sports about this. Stop with the name-calling and the insults. Don't think of it as Nvidia "losing" -- you're just "passing the performance crown" for a little while.

It's not this:

ATI --> :nutkick: <-- Nvidia

It's this:

ATI --> :toast: <-- Nvidia
 

X1REME

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
84 (0.01/day)
hey dudes hd4870x2 cf beats anything nvidia has ever made or even ever thought of lol (except crisis) which is rigged most likely or unoptimised for the amd/ati on purpose. nvidia`s new plan are to send patches out from games to disable dx10 support so that nvidia stands a chance again. like anandtech did with 2 games making nvidia win when all the other sites say the contrary. well enjoy ur nvidia cards that are soon gonna explode (thermal package cheap/faulty)from what ive heard and seen lol

technology will always improve and get smaller in power usage and higher in performance
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Megasty

New Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
1,263 (0.21/day)
Location
The Kingdom of Au
Processor i7 920 @ 3.6 GHz (4.0 when gaming)
Motherboard Asus Rampage II Extreme - Yeah I Bought It...
Cooling Swiftech.
Memory 12 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer - I Love Red
Video Card(s) ASUS EAH4870X2 - That Fan Is...!?
Storage 4 WD 1.5 TB
Display(s) 24" Sceptre
Case TT Xaser VI - Fugly, Red, & Huge...
Audio Device(s) The ASUS Thingy
Power Supply Ultra X3 1000W
Software Vista Ultimate SP1 64bit
Wow, this thread has completely blown me over. At first, I thought it was about AMD evening up the market share in the discrete gfx department - then it switched over to 3 GTX280s vs 2 4870x2s. Anyway, Crysis is completely defeated by both options even though the 3 GTX280s have a few more fps here & there. I bet ppl will still be using the first game (in all its coded bs) as a benchmark long after the trilogy is over :rolleyes: AMD has finally returned us to the old days where they could either keep up with NV or thump them into the ground, no matter what the methodology.

Now if I can only find a BB with the card b4 the 31st... :toast:
 

PCpraiser100

New Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
1,062 (0.18/day)
System Name REBEL R1
Processor Core i7 920
Motherboard ASUS P6T
Cooling Stock
Memory 6GB OCZ GOLD TC LV Kit 1866MHz@1.65V 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) Two Sapphire HD 5770 Vapor-X Xfire'd and OC'd (920/1330)
Storage Seagate 7200.11 500GB 32MB
Case Antec Three Hundred
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D1 PCI Sound Card
Power Supply OCZ StealthXStream 500W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Benchmark Scores 16585 Performance Score on 3DMark Vantage
hey dudes hd4870x2 cf beats anything nvidia has ever made or even ever thought of lol (except crisis) which is rigged most likely or unoptimised for the amd/ati on purpose. nvidia`s new plan are to send patches out from games to disable dx10 support so that nvidia stands a chance again. like anandtech did with 2 games making nvidia win when all the other sites say the contrary. well enjoy ur nvidia cards that are soon gonna explode (thermal package cheap/faulty)from what ive heard and seen lol

Personally, I think Crysis is not realistic anymore. I think its overkill in many ways. The shaders barely scale with any textures, post processing barely affects the distant textures and shaders, the AA isn't traditional multisampling, and the Physics in the game are completely unnecessary due to the number of resources it takes up. I like Half-Life 2 WAAAAY better this way, Valve barely uses shaders in the game only on NPCs and specific story-line props and vehicles. The textures, water, shadow, and volumetric details blow me away since they perfectly scale between each other. Not too detailed, not too incompatible. Perfect:toast: As for DX10, I don't know the reason why this is such a big issue as shaders are the cuprits to this frenzy. Thinking about games like Bioshock and Gears of War makes me think that its the developers that we should be worrying about, not the APIs and graphics cards. I remember the old days as barely any titles affected the gaming world unless if it were to promote something, like DX9 along with Crossfire and SLI. Now this is a more past-time version of right now. As we're not staying compatible anymore, we are just giving developers more fuel to piss the community off. This is kind of linked to the gaming consoles like PS3 and Xbox 360. Developers are not fully the culprits as its console gamers who keep asking "Can you develop games that blow me away with my LCD TV?" and the developers, who are just trying to fit with our PC requests like "I own a shitty dell so can you make this game run on it?" can be very challenging as to support those two kinds of requests, they have work in not only one game project, but two game projects. So what do they have to do? Make compromises for performance and stability. Thus, taking longer to create games rather than releasing them. The solution? Well if most of the world threw away their consoles and bought decent PCs (or vice-versa) this will put a more positive effect on the game industry. We should promote that instead if playing the same ol' titles until Half-Life 2 Episode Three is released.
 
Last edited:

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,244 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,490 (0.39/day)
Location
Your house.
System Name Jupiter-2
Processor Intel i3-6100
Motherboard H170I-PLUS D3
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB Mushkin DDR3L-1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1050ti
Storage 512GB Corsair SSD
Display(s) BENQ 24in
Case Lian Li PC-Q01B Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 450W
Mouse Logitech Trackball
Keyboard Custom bamboo job
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.
That weapon is left in its stash...to counter 55nm G200s methinks.

I know this is Fudzilla but...http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8899&Itemid=34

HD 4850 X2 gives the GTX 280 a sound thrashing.

Seeing as how cheap one HD 4850 is these days, they should be able to go lower than $400 for that 4850 X2, perhaps keeping pace with whatever lower price Nvidia will inevitably put on the GTX 280.

Man, it's an exciting time for low prices! :laugh:
 
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
2,116 (0.31/day)
System Name Not named
Processor Intel 8700k @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Assassin II
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair LPX 3000mhz CL15
Video Card(s) Zotac 1080 Ti AMP EXTREME
Storage Samsung 960 PRO 512GB
Display(s) 24" Dell IPS 1920x1200
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Watt Fully Modular
OK...I was...wrong. GTX 280 x3 is chopped. NVIDIA is talking crap.

You go up in my books not for admitting one company is talking crap or better than the other, but because someone admitted due to evidence their opinion needed to be re-evaluated. :toast:


I'm not sure AMD will be able to pull off 50% market share or not however they do seem fairly confident which makes me wonder when the next die shrink will happen.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
5,941 (1.00/day)
Location
Watauga, Texas
System Name Univac SLI Edition
Processor Intel Xeon 1650 V3 @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard eVGA X99 FTW K
Cooling EK Supremacy EVO, Swiftech MCP50x, Alphacool NeXXos UT60 360, Black Ice GTX 360
Memory 2x16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Nvidia Titan X Tri-SLI w/ EK Blocks
Storage HyperX Predator 240GB PCI-E, Samsung 850 Pro 512GB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp 34" Ultra-Wide (U3415W) / (Samsung 48" Curved 4k)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Acrylic Edition
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Thermaltake 1350watt Toughpower Modular
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard CODE 10 keyless MX Clears
Software Windows 10 Pro
Single fastest card = 4870X2
Single fastest chip is GTX280

Lets make the playing grounds more fair. It isnt exactly fair to compare 1 GPU to 2 GPUs. The 2 GPUs will almost always win in any scenario.
Lets put 2 G200 chips on a single board and see whos the winner. Im sure we'll find Nvidia wills till be top single card performance king. Not a fanboi but just stating the facts.

Sad thing is though i think we'll have to wait till 55nm process to see any kind of G200 GX2 variance.
 

GPUCafe

GPU Cafe Representative
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
50 (0.01/day)
All I've figured out from this whole thing is that there are a LOT of people everywhere that are suddenly very pissed off that ATI now has the fastest card. :twitch:

I mean, come on -- if you're an Nvidia fan, you shouldn't be getting defensive. ATI now has the fastest card, big deal.
Early adopters of GTX280 should thank AMD, for getting 15-20% of their money back. :D Props to Nvidia's partners for adopting such a move, I'm sure the goodwill they have gained through this will result in brand loyalty.


That weapon is left in its stash...to counter 55nm G200s methinks.

I know this is Fudzilla but...http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8899&Itemid=34

HD 4850 X2 gives the GTX 280 a sound thrashing.


Note: This is the PR slide from AMD ;)
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,812 (1.61/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I dont think Nvidia could viably put two GTX2XX cores on a single card the way AMD does. Given the die size, I dont see that happening. However, if Nvidia were able to do it, Id respectfully bow out of my previous statement. Regardless of two gpus, its still a single card.

With the prices and performance of ATIs cards growing (and shrinking for prices) 50% market share is more than in the realm of possibility.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
850 (0.13/day)
Location
USA
I dont think Nvidia could viably put two GTX2XX cores on a single card the way AMD does. Given the die size, I dont see that happening. However, if Nvidia were able to do it, Id respectfully bow out of my previous statement. Regardless of two gpus, its still a single card.

With the prices and performance of ATIs cards growing (and shrinking for prices) 50% market share is more than in the realm of possibility.
They did it with the 9800x2 so they probably could. I don't think it would sell for the price they would have to make it. Nvidia may be content till next round just for the fact that the 4870x2 didn't take the world by storm and there are many "fanboys" out there that are still arguing its not faster. Just a thought but who knows
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
5,941 (1.00/day)
Location
Watauga, Texas
System Name Univac SLI Edition
Processor Intel Xeon 1650 V3 @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard eVGA X99 FTW K
Cooling EK Supremacy EVO, Swiftech MCP50x, Alphacool NeXXos UT60 360, Black Ice GTX 360
Memory 2x16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Nvidia Titan X Tri-SLI w/ EK Blocks
Storage HyperX Predator 240GB PCI-E, Samsung 850 Pro 512GB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp 34" Ultra-Wide (U3415W) / (Samsung 48" Curved 4k)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Acrylic Edition
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Thermaltake 1350watt Toughpower Modular
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard CODE 10 keyless MX Clears
Software Windows 10 Pro
I dont think Nvidia could viably put two GTX2XX cores on a single card the way AMD does. Given the die size, I dont see that happening. However, if Nvidia were able to do it, Id respectfully bow out of my previous statement. Regardless of two gpus, its still a single card.
I know what your saying but i was talking 55nm G200 chips and regardless of single card or not a single G200 is more powerful than a single RV770.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Messages
3,175 (0.53/day)
Location
Brockport, NY
System Name Is rly gud
Processor Intel Core i5 11600kf
Motherboard Asus Prime Z590-V ATX
Memory (48GB total) 16GB (2x8GB) Crucial Ballistix Sport 3000MHZ and G. Skill Ripjaws 32GB 3200MHZ (2x16GB)
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE RTX 3060 12GB
Storage 1TB MSI Spatium M370 NVMe M.2 SSD
Display(s) 32" Viewsonic 4k, 34" Samsung 3440x1440, XP Pen Creative Pro 13.3
Power Supply EVGA 600 80+ Gold
VR HMD Meta Quest Pro, Tundra Trackers
Software Windows 10
I know what your saying but i was talking 55nm G200 chips and regardless of single card or not a single G200 is more powerful than a single RV770.

Not by a hell of a lot.
 

PCpraiser100

New Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
1,062 (0.18/day)
System Name REBEL R1
Processor Core i7 920
Motherboard ASUS P6T
Cooling Stock
Memory 6GB OCZ GOLD TC LV Kit 1866MHz@1.65V 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) Two Sapphire HD 5770 Vapor-X Xfire'd and OC'd (920/1330)
Storage Seagate 7200.11 500GB 32MB
Case Antec Three Hundred
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D1 PCI Sound Card
Power Supply OCZ StealthXStream 500W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Benchmark Scores 16585 Performance Score on 3DMark Vantage
Not by a hell of a lot.

zithe is right. In fact, NEWS FLASH ATI's RV770 cores are not showing full performance expectations due to driver optimization issues. If Nvidia thinks this will be easy, think again. With the 8.8 drivers on the way, HD 4870 will probably be right up to the GTX 280's face as well as HD 4850 with the GTX 260. Do you remember the Hd 3870's performance went it first came out? Once, the card could only top out at 12fps on Crysis and 15fps on HL2 EP2 (2560x1600) with max settings. Now, its maxed at 19fps on Crysis and 29fps on HL2 EP2. As for the Hd 4000 series with their 800 streams of graphics horsepower along with a little more transistors, the newest drivers will give the HD 4850 and the Hd 4870 a lot more extra juice than expected.
 
Top