- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 21,541 (3.40/day)
System Name | Pioneer |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen R9 9950X |
Motherboard | GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans... |
Memory | 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310 |
Storage | Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs |
Display(s) | 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display |
Case | Thermaltake Core X31 |
Audio Device(s) | TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED |
Power Supply | FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W |
Mouse | Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless |
Keyboard | WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps |
Software | Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024 |
Lenovo has since gone into full damage control and denial. It removed the thread from its support forums (view a cached copy), and even changed its explanation from "we blatantly admitted to anti-competitive practices that could cost us a billion-dollar class-action lawsuit" to "we simply don't have drivers for our deliberately unusual RAID setup."
Sounds like just a typical softraid chip, which linux has always had to support themselves since Intel and Adaptec made it a thing. Why should they have to write linux drivers? The linux kernel team typically does that.
Unless there is something REALLY unusual with this raid setup, I'm missing something. This isn't anti-competitive.
If it wasn't for Microsoft, we'd all be using either a proprietary IBM platform or something from Apple. Wintel did a lot more for the computer industry than you and many others give credit for...
Actually, it's IBM's fault the PC is an open platform. They did not copyright the basic BIOS that forms a modern PC. Microsoft has been trying to take control of the platform ever since. Just sayin'.