• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Announces FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3) Fluid Motion Rivaling DLSS 3, Broad Hardware Support

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,509 (4.63/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Definitely no need to fanboy about it for sure no pun intended :laugh:

As an owner of a 4090 I hope it's better than Nvidia alternative or at the very least comparable. I really like the features and as others have stated it's a bummer that it is locked to 40 series cards.

Late is better than never and honestly hopefully AMD has used this time to perfect it as much as they can.

It won't be better, especially with the new DLSS ray reconstruction technology being available now, but if they can pull a FSR 2 again - not the best but okay and rather comparable - it'll be a welcome addition to the portfolio, of course.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
205 (0.15/day)
I have little interest in frame generation, with maybe an exception for vr, just in general I am fairly insensitive to higher framerates visually.
If latency was not a factor I would probalby be fine playing at 30fps.
In terms of input, that's a different story.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,823 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
It won't be better, especially with the new DLSS ray reconstruction technology being available now, but if they can pull a FSR 2 again - not the best but okay and rather comparable - it'll be a welcome addition to the portfolio, of course.

Honestly I was hoping for FSR2 to be improved just as much as seeing their Frame generation technology. FSR is keeping me from buying an amd gpu more than DLSS frame generation. I still don't like FSR even in quality mode at 4k and especially at 1440p it would be awesome if they got it to the point where it doesn't matter what technology you are using.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
15 (0.01/day)
While I like that AMD will let a broader audience test their newer upscaler technology, I don't like the fact they didn't show charts comparing rx 7000 series to rx 6000 series, neither why the GPU cache has been cut in half in 7700 xt and 7800 xt compared to their older counterparts. Why my 6700 xt has double the cache of the 7700 xt? Shouldn't it be increasing instead, or at least staying equal?
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,167 (5.74/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
While I like that AMD will let a broader audience to test their newer upscaler technology, I don't like the fact they didn't show charts comparing rx 7000 series to rx 6000 series, neither why the GPU cache has been cut in half in 7700 xt and 7800 xt compared to their older counterparts. Why my 6700 xt has double the cache of the 7700 xt? Shouldn't be increasing instead, or at least staying equal?
They probably found that the large cache doesn't help as much as they thought with RDNA 2.

As for not comparing with last gen, I agree. We'll have to wait for reviews, unfortunately.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
1,848 (1.35/day)
Location
Alaska USA
You're conflating things....people are juat celebrating the fact that it works on a lot of different hardware while condemning the fact that Nvidia's version is limited to 4000 series for no reason other than greed.

FYI: Nvidia is basically a monopoly with unlimited power and a history of anti-consumer and cartelistic practices....I don't think they need any individual defending them.
I believe he was referring to the AMD cultist on here. Not fanboys ... cultist. There's a difference.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,600 (1.49/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
They probably found that the large cache doesn't help as much as they thought with RDNA 2.

As for not comparing with last gen, I agree. We'll have to wait for reviews, unfortunately.
If AMD's figures are accurate, then the 7800 XT would be as fast as a 6800 XT. This won't be the first time that a (x+1)y card is comparable to the xy card: the HD 6870 was slightly slower than the 5870.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
You don't really think AMD cares about you do you? That they're doing this out of kindness of their hearts?
This is the typical stupid (sorry) excuse I read usually from people who have no arguments. No one really cares about you, me or anybody, but some try to offer you more to manage to make you their customers. Now if you choose to ignore the company that pretents at least to care about you by offering more for less, because their major interest now is to make you their customer and prefer to pay more to the company that screams it in your face that they don't care about you and they only want to grab your money, be my quest. But that's not an argument and not something to advertise.

Don't you think the timing is just a bit too convenient? Couldn't possibly be intended to deflect from the overwhelmingly negative press about the 7800 XT being slower than the 6800 XT, I guess that's just silly ol me and my ngreediot tendencies :rolleyes:
A bicycle has wheels, a van has wheels, so a bicycle and a van are the same. You are trying to be smart here, you are failing.
7800XT might end up slower compared to 6800XT and obviously it will get "overwhelmingly negative press" because we know that the press loves attacking AMD. Nvidia has done the same, there was backslash about that, just not "overwhelming" obviously. Waiting to show us your posts about the amazing performance of RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti compared to RTX 3060 and RTX 3060 Ti.
In any case people like you love to find ONE example for a company so they can "PROVE" that that company is the same as one that had done and keep doing a number of anti consumer moves. Well if you want to troll, I don't have the time.

By the time my 4080 runs any game at 30 fps, there's only two courses of action: I'm upgrading (or rather I've already upgraded twice since then) or - if due to unreasonably high system requirements that just make no sense - I'm simply not playing the game.
As I said, people with money and no care for others, love capitalism.

Anyway, I see you had NOTHING to say until now. Not really, some smart... asus comments.
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,016 (0.65/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
Wonderful, now everyone will be able to enjoy fake frames- not just the elite snob.

The kink is naked, hip hip hooray!
 
D

Deleted member 185088

Guest
Interesting that they are able to do similar thing as nVidia's FG without using specialised hardware, IMHO nVidia doesn't care about gaming just what suits them in professional products, else they won't waste silicon on specialised hardware.

But fake frames aren't for me, maybe for something like Flight simulator but games like that don't require high FPS.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,509 (4.63/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
This is the typical stupid (sorry) excuse I read usually from people who have no arguments. No one really cares about you, me or anybody, but some try to offer you more to manage to make you their customers. Now if you choose to ignore the company that pretents at least to care about you by offering more for less, because their major interest now is to make you their customer and prefer to pay more to the company that screams it in your face that they don't care about you and they only want to grab your money, be my quest. But that's not an argument and not something to advertise.


A bicycle has wheels, a van has wheels, so a bicycle and a van are the same. You are trying to be smart here, you are failing.
7800XT might end up slower compared to 6800XT and obviously it will get "overwhelmingly negative press" because we know that the press loves attacking AMD. Nvidia has done the same, there was backslash about that, waiting to shows ous your posts about the amazing performance of RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti compared to RTX 3060 and RTX 3060 Ti.
In any cases people like you love to find ONE example for a company so they can "PROVE" that that company is the same as one that had done and keep doing a number of anti consumer moves. Well if you want to troll, I don't have the time.


As I said, people with money and no care for others, love capitalism.

Anyway, I see you had NOTHING to say until now. Not really, some smart... asus comments.

I'm not trolling, but I have been called lots of names for pointing out the obvious

Which is fine, really. It doesn't bother me, end of the day you do you I do me and in fact I can do it all with my Nvidia card.

It's this moral grandstanding from AMD fans that I find the most amusing of all and that's the only reason I'm answering this post, how do you even lay claim to AMDs originality? They have purchased companies and IP small and large alike to add to their own portfolio. Their AI stuff is from Xilinx, hell I won't even go too far, see that Radeon Boost and Radeon Chill thing? They bought the IP and hired the HiAlgo guy for it.

Point is, you just dislike Nvidia so fiercely that my initial point of "this sucked just cause it was an Nvidia thing until now" somehow had personal level effect on you.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,386 (3.29/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
If AMD's driver level implementation of frame interpolation is decent this will make Nvidia look really bad because not only they lock these things out of their ecosystem but they even lock them out from within it, what excuse will they have to not offer some driver level option across older generations of cards ?

It will also play really well into their marketing if they know how to play their cards, they're gonna be able to do the classic Nvidia "look a gazillion fps more if you enable X feature" but it will actually work on everything lol.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
I'm not trolling, but I have been called lots of names for pointing out the obvious

Which is fine, really. It doesn't bother me, end of the day you do you I do me and in fact I can do it all with my Nvidia card.
Yes you are. Sorry to.... point the obvious, but when you avoid TRULY replying to a post and just throwing stuff about capitalism, or trying to find one example from one side, ignoring a dozen from the other, or when trying to change the subject to something more favorable to you, that's I think the definition of trolling. You don't want to be seen as someone trolling? Try to quote posts and post arguments about where you see it differently. Not ignore what people explain to you from their view in their posts and try to play it smart with a nothing reply.

Ignoring reality doesn't point to obvious conclusions. Just favorable. At least you feel fine ignoring reality and that's fine with me.
It's this moral grandstanding from AMD fans that I find the most amusing of all and that's the only reason I'm answering this post, how do you even lay claim to AMDs originality? They have purchased companies and IP small and large alike to add to their own portfolio. Their AI stuff is from Xilinx, hell I won't even go too far, see that Radeon Boost and Radeon Chill thing? They bought the IP and hired the HiAlgo guy for it.
It's not about moral grandstanding. It's a fact. AMD knows that the press is unfavorable, that consumers are more keen in choosing something with an Nvidia logo on it, so it tries to give consumers reasons to choose them instead to give them reasons to go with Intel or Nvidia. That makes them look as having a higher moral standard than Nvidia. Like how Intel looks today as more consumer friendly in an effort to get back market share in the CPU market and get some market share in the GPU market.
I like how AMD trying to expand it's potential is translated from you as immoral tactics. It's really funny.
Point is, you just dislike Nvidia so fiercely that my initial point of "this sucked just cause it was an Nvidia thing until now" somehow had personal level effect on you.
Yeah, that's the easy "arguments". "You are with the others" "You have hatred for Nvidia". That's not an argument. That's desperation of not being able to find an argument.

If AMD's driver level implementation of frame interpolation is decent this will make Nvidia look really bad because not only they lock these things out of their ecosystem but they even lock them out from within it, what excuse will they have to not offer some driver level option across older generations of cards ?
Nvidia is locking out stuff for ages and nothing bad is happening with their sales or reputation. They control the narrative. The end.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,016 (0.65/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
Interesting that they are able to do similar thing as nVidia's FG without using specialised hardware, IMHO nVidia doesn't care about gaming just what suits them in professional products, else they won't waste silicon on specialised hardware.

But fake frames aren't for me, maybe for something like Flight simulator but games like that don't require high FPS.
Fake frames are especially for high fps, because at lower fps the 'fake' side effect is more visible and the increased leg is bigger.

You only left to choose what kind of GPU color (red\green) will play your fake games.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
427 (0.17/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling Noctua U12S
Memory 32GB @ 3600 CL18
Video Card(s) AMD 6800XT
Storage WD Black SN850(1TB), WD Black NVMe 2018(500GB), WD Blue SATA(2TB)
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G9
Case Be Quiet! Silent Base 802
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME-GX-1000
The only thing I'm really looking forward to is, if you can turn Fluid Motion Fames off is:
The Maximum Fidelity preset of FSR 3 is essentially AMD's version of DLAA (to use the detail regeneration and AA features of FSR without dropping down resolution).
I'll be curious to see the quality differences of FSR 3 Maximum fidelity verses TAA and the quality differences between DLAA and this.

Fake frames are still fake frames, so the Fluid Motion Frames aren't something I'm interested in. They're only good when you're getting high enough frames to not feel the added input lag, but if you're getting 60+ FPS already, it doesn't seem like adding to that is really all that useful. I guess I'll get to see in the next few months for myself.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,167 (5.74/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
Fake frames are especially for high fps, because at lower fps the 'fake' side effect is more visible and the increased leg is bigger.
Yes. But at high frame rates, you don't rely on fake frames anyway. That's why I think the whole technology is pointless.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Interesting that they are able to do similar thing as nVidia's FG without using specialised hardware, IMHO nVidia doesn't care about gaming just what suits them in professional products, else they won't waste silicon on specialised hardware.

But fake frames aren't for me, maybe for something like Flight simulator but games like that don't require high FPS.
If it is like DLSS 2 vs FSR 2, their approach will probably end up inferior. The question is by how much. And also another question is how tech press will interpret that lower quality. Would they be objective, or try to present an image where a somewhat inferior quality for FSR 3 is in fact a broken, unusable feature?
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,016 (0.65/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
The only thing I'm really looking forward to is, if you can turn Fluid Motion Fames off is:

I'll be curious to see the quality differences of FSR 3 Maximum fidelity verses TAA and the quality differences between DLAA and this.

Fake frames are still fake frames, so the Fluid Motion Frames aren't something I'm interested in. They're only good when you're getting high enough frames to not feel the added input lag, but if you're getting 60+ FPS already, it doesn't seem like adding to that is really all that useful. I guess I'll get to see in the next few months for myself.
You got it right, dlss3 is good to get you from that 200+ fps close to thet golden 500fps.

Yes. But at high frame rates, you don't rely on fake frames anyway. That's why I think the whole technology is pointless.
Yep. Agreed.
You choose to compromise on leg and image authentic instead on graphic settings.

You can get higher fps either way, but with dlss3 you have the privilege to pay much more for that!
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,960 (1.72/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
It's amusing how it works, Nvidia introduces a pioneering technology, gets blasted for it, AMD releases an inferior copy and it's everyone's darling for doing so.


Like Gsync? Which already existed, but Nvidia had to have a special monitor for with a special Gsync extra cost? But AMD was already doing variable refresh rates, as was Intel and Nvidia in laptops and some kiosks

Or like Tesselation, which ATI had years before. But Nvidia had to put it in a box and tesselate concrete barriers and invisible u derground water.....

Or like Nvidia running low color for years to boost performance?

Or like Physx with it's huge game support, that prebaked most effects anyway?

Or when devs stopped tesselating concrete barriers and invisible water the next bright idea to use their overblown hardware for was hair works, I still see that a lot cause it was so revolutionary.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,752 (0.80/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Being a jackass doesn't win you points.
I'm not the one who posted stupid shit and got called out for it.

and given that AMD was able to find a generic way of doing it means that Nvidia could have done it the same way and chose not to
Oh I'm sorry, mister "I know the intimate technical details of how both DLSS 3 and FSR 3 are implemented better than the engineers who created them". Oh wait you don't, hence you aren't qualified to make any claims about either of these technologies. Sit down and keep quiet, kid.

In my opinion
Which is worth about as much as your alleged technical knowledge.

They all work exactly in the same way, dividing the frames into a grid, using motion vectors to estimate which blocks within the grid have changed between frames and then reconstruing the intermediate frame according to how these blocks have moved.
That is the principle by which they work, not the technical implementation. Or to put it simply, the what not the how. But go ahead and keep telling yourself that those two things are the same.

Nvidia doesnt allow AMD to use DLSS = all fine
AMD doesnt allow Nvidia to use DLSS = OMG WHAT THUGS, SO ANTI CONSUMER
You're lying by comparing two things that are completely different. Stop lying, it doesn't make you look smart, in fact it does the exact opposite.

7800XT might end up slower compared to 6800XT and obviously it will get "overwhelmingly negative press" because we know that the press loves attacking AMD.
No, it will get negative press because releasing a newer product of the same tier, that is slower than its predecessor, is anti-consumer bullshit and absolutely deserves being called out - whether AMD or NVIDIA does it. Except NVIDIA doesn't.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Yes Nvidia does it. Look at the 8GB 4060 vs the 12GB 3060. Or should I mention the introduction of GTX 1630?
Please.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,752 (0.80/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Nvidia is locking out stuff for ages and nothing bad is happening with their sales or reputation. They control the narrative. The end.
For someone who accuses others of making poor arguments, you're doing a pretty bang-up job yourself. "Nvidia is locking out stuff for ages"? "They control the narrative"? What is this nonsensical illuminati bullshit?
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
151 (0.04/day)
I'm still more inclined to buy an rtx 4070 instead of an rx 7800xt and that's only because AMD "stupidly" doesn't lock their stuff to their cards. How ironic, no?
But if 7800xt offers better raster performance or equal to 4070, minus RT performance in some games I might not even play, 16GB 256 bit bus, million of years ahead all-in-one gpu control panel, comparative heat/ noise might sway me
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,752 (0.80/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Yes Nvidia does it. Look at the 8GB 4060 vs the 12GB 3060.
You mean the 4060 that is always faster than the 3060? Can I have some of what you're smoking?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top