There you go. Take an opportunity, if you have spare time, to triangulate data and come up with more balanced reasoning.
You have Gamers Nexus, Hardware Unboxed, Tom's Hardware, PC World, Hardware Canucks, etc. Great diversity of data.
We already know this is not great value as a general-purpose CPU. It does well if the data happens to fit in the cache, but you can get more cores for the same $$$ and get better overall application performance.
This is not a general purpose CPU. This is the premium gaming CPU with good general purpose performance; far more versatile than 7800X3D has ever been. You will need to judge its value on both accounts.
You can certainly add more cores at similar and lower price to get more application performance, but those CPUs will not compensate in gaming. For example, 265K and 9900X are only 12-13% faster in applications, on average, according to TPU. Tom's Hardware found 7900X3D to be only 10% faster in MT workloads. That's with four extra cores. 9800X3D appears in their testing to be 34% faster in MT than 7800X3D. Huge difference gen-on-gen.
This processor bring another type of buyer into the game, which will make this CPU even a better seller than 7800X3D. Before, it X3D was a premium gaming CPU only, with acceptable daily usage in applications.
Now, 9800X3D is way more versatile chip, especially for content creators. In AV1 encoding, it's on par with i9 24-core Raptors and 16 core X3D from the previous gen (TPU). Who would ever expect to see that? So, this CPU is a multi-faceted chip that we have not had before.
Any and all judgements of it will need to be more niuanced and tailored towards wider range of buyers, for example:
1. premium gaming only - no brainer
2. premium productivity - there are better chips, of course
3. premium gaming and good productivity in applications that buyers work with - new market for 9800X3D