AMD Ryzen Benchmarks Leaked - Amazing Multi-core and Single-core Performance

[Evo85]

Don't expect HWBOT till the chip is released and its tested on a performance board.

The benchmarks posted are focused on the CPU. 3DMark is a graphics focused benchmark.

The jist of what has been released is to show the potential of these chips and how much they have closed the gap between Intel and AMD.

Take with a grain of salt and a sip of coffee.

 

[bogami]

Wonderful and, of course, finally! This will put AMD on their known positions when Intel rode behind , and knocked profit ,monopolistic ,behavior ,towards customers with crazy prices of the Intel side.
500 $ for the best processor on the market is a good slap in the face to Intel.
Now i and you can buy X processor that is worthy of the mark X. The first quadro EQ6700X cost me 1,000€ and it seemed to be too expensive . Bravo AMD !.

 

[Franzen4Real]

Impressive though this is, I want to see actual game benchmarks and real world performance figures... benchmarks are by and large meaningless in the grand scheme of things. They may point to real world performance, but they are no hard core evidence of it. I await eagerly, and with optimism... hopefully disappointment will not follow.

I think if you are looking towards gaming results, disappointment may follow. Any of the high end Intel and Ryzen CPUs are probably capable of causing a GPU bound scenario, and won't really give a reliable representation of +/- performance. Games are not a good way of testing true CPU performance delta. Unless you are talking about CSGO or similar that people are looking to trade resolution/detail for frame rate, then I can see where it may be helpful. Maybe we can get some Titan SLI @ 1080p tests that would show difference in actual gaming performance.

I am an AMD hopeful though, I'm ready to go pure Red again like the pre-C2D days... (Blue/Green has been a bit expensive over the years)

 

[ssdpro]

This will put AMD on their known positions when Intel rode behind , and knocked profit ,monopolistic ,behavior ,towards customers with crazy prices of the Intel side.
500 $ for the best processor on the market is a good slap in the face to Intel. Bravo AMD !.

This is the CPU we have been waiting for! AMD processors power premium products and world-class operations from industry leaders like HP, Microsoft, Samsung Electronics, and Sony. This CPU will offer aggressive performance for mega-tasking and intensive applications like video editing and 3D modeling. After release of these products AMD will continue to be an industry Leader in Price for the Performance!


/sigh

 

[TheLaughingMan]

Ill wait for @cadaveca to review before I'm impressed.

AMD doesn't like him and sends him nothing remember.

 

[YautjaLord]

Shaping up nicely. Prime95 is probably the single-threaded torture test for me tho, cause this thing ran stable for 3 hours on my then Phenom II 965 & this CPU was @ 4.0GHz. If the flagship 1800X will run stable for 4 hours of this torture (Blend test) @ 5.0* - i call it the real sh!t & call it a day. Only other real world/game test i'm interested to see tested on this CPU is DOOM 4/2016 @ 4k max everything 4 or even 8xAA/16xAF. Two or approx. three weeks left til these released, yeah? Sh!t's getting better & better.

*Under EKWB's custom 3x120mm/360XE-based liquid cooling kit.

 

[HD64G]

AMD doesn't like him and sends him nothing remember.

He is an enthusiast and will buy himself a Ryzan 1800X just to play with I guess then...

 

[m1dg3t]

My take away from reading all the various Ryzen threads on the web is: Most peoples kids - SMH.

Damn near $1k Intel for under $400 and still complain.
-------------------------------------

Looks like a 1700x/1800x is just what I need, along with an ENTHUSIAST CLASS iTX MoBo - Hear that Asrock/MSi/Gigabyte?

 

[eidairaman1]

After relying on Piledriver for almost 5 years, it needs to be considerably better.

 

[m1dg3t]

After relying on Piledriver for almost 5 years, it needs to be considerably better.

ANYONE who thinks Ryzen performance is gonna be like Bulldozer/Piledriver has NOT been paying attention.

I would've went with an 8320 or similar last go 'round but there wasn't much IF any options for enthusiast iTX so I went with Intel.

 

[RealNeil]

Some honest reviews from my favorite review sites will go a long way for me.
I can wait, but only just barely.
This is getting to be an exciting build-up for Ryzen. It appears to be excellent news at this stage of the game.
I've always continued to buy AMD products (even after the Bulldozer debacle) because they are necessary for these markets. But my best systems are all better-performing Intel-based boxes, mainly because I'm a performance whore.
Also, I think that Intel has had free rein for far too long, and they're arrogant. I'm ready to see them stimulated into releasing some of the magic shit that they're probably sitting on. Either way, It's a good time to be a consumer.

 

[Mescalamba]

But in My case its a Ryzen CPU and an Nvidia GPU. No plans on replacing this GTX 1080 (now Hydro) any time soon.

Ah sorry, got it wrong. CPU should be fine, there is literally no reason why it shouldnt. Never found CC to be too CPU heavy, mostly it just eats ton of memory and some GPU power (if accelerated which IMHO is really must have). You should be fine.

 

[Xajel]

Impressive indeed !!

Other than a main rig ( which if it will be built on Ryzen it will be the highest-end one ), I'm also thinking about a small mini-itx server ( NAS + Plex ) which might reach near ~8000 passmark to handle 3-4 fHD streams... I still don't know which CPU this will be, it might not be a CPU also, it might be Ryzen based APU ( eg. Raven Ridge ) which means 4C/8T APU, I know this can easily reach that mark as even stock i5-3570K can reach 7000+, so I guess even Ryzen 3 ( 4C/4T ) can get over 8000 easily, but I'll be looking for lower TDP also and low cost.

 

[TheGuruStud]

As for Physics test, I guess its PhysX for CPU? Still that benchmark doesnt make much sense, unless its somehow specifically tuned to Intel.

256 bit AVX? AMD said screw 256 AVX as it's a waste of die space.

And, yeah, a lot of the syns (more like sins) are tuned for Intel. Where you think the money is coming from? Lol. (Ever see how many Intel logos are on cinebench ads?)

 

[Dbiggs9]

1700X or 1700 i think might be a sweet spot. I like the 65Watt 1700 as i don't like to run fans for noise

 

[Basard]

Just jizzed in my pants!

 

[cdawall]

WCCF as a source? I'll get the truckload of salt.

 

[diatribe]

I wouldn't put to much weight in CPU Mark. Let's see some real world numbers before we celebrate to early.

I'm wish AMD the best and we need competition, but lets not jump the gun here.

 

[KarymidoN]

Single Core performance still really low compared to 7700K... some games are really crap for multi-core-cpus so expect some tests to give intel the edge. other than that, i'll buy ryzen + am4 mid range setup. yay.

 

[TheGuruStud]

Single Core performance still really low compared to 7700K... some games are really crap for multi-core-cpus so expect some tests to give intel the edge. other than that, i'll buy ryzen + am4 mid range setup. yay.

With 1ghz difference, why wouldn't it be? Lol

 

[Melvis]

Ill wait for @cadaveca to review before I'm impressed.

Ill wait for Guru3D's results, the best and most none BIAS on the net!

 

[TRWOV]

15 days more. I think I'll get a vanilla X1700 and see what can I get out of it

 

[mastrdrver]

What's up with the SSE numbers? Is higher better? If so what's going on?

 

[Serpent of Darkness]

Hypehypehype!

What exactly is Physics in the benchmarks? or what uses does it have?

and

As for Physics test, I guess its PhysX for CPU? Still that benchmark doesnt make much sense, unless its somehow specifically tuned to Intel.

Physics benchmark is basically a measure of how well or fast the CPU can compute physics simulations on the fly in a game. If you two have either played Star Wars The Old Republic, physics occurs when your characters moves, and your cape is flapping in the wind. When you go up or down in an elevator in The Old Republic, the cape moves up or down. The cape looks like it has a cloth modifier if you follow 3Ds Max. That's physics in action. All of the physics, by default, is done by the CPU only. On the other hand, if you are playing a PC game that uses PhysX, and you are using a NVidia Graphic Card for PhysX, PhysX basically offload commands for physic to the NVidia GPU, which ever GPU is dedicated to PhysX, and you're CPU suffers less of a bottleneck.

@Mescalamba, PhysX is physics for the GPU to compute for the CPU. When you don't play a game that doesn't use PhysX, again, by default, your CPU computes all physic for a game. It doesn't matter if you are using an NVidia or AMD Graphic Card to offload frame-rendering to the GPU. If for rendering, and the program uses PhysX, it helps to simulate particles, voxels and physics simulations in the aide of rendering. The hit that the CPU has to do for Physics is minor at best for games. Usually because there isn't a lot of physic calculations going on. So having the CPU compute physics, or having PhysX compute it doesn't really improve much as far as framerates.

 

[Jurassic1024]

As for Physics test, I guess its PhysX for CPU?

Software based physics. Havok to be exact.

Ill wait for Guru3D's results, the best and most none BIAS on the net!

Yea, Guru has used AMD marketing slide results in their reviews (Fury X), and AMD employees post in their comments (AMD Roy). Any site is better than Guru3D for hardware reviews.

*edit made to second reply. Guru obviously doesn't ONLY use AMD's tests for their results.