- Joined
- Sep 6, 2013
- Messages
- 3,514 (0.84/day)
- Location
- Athens, Greece
System Name | 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5 7600 / Ryzen 5 4600G / Ryzen 5 5500 |
Motherboard | X670E Gaming Plus WiFi / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) |
Cooling | Aigo ICE 400SE / Segotep T4 / Νoctua U12S |
Memory | Kingston FURY Beast 32GB DDR5 6000 / 16GB JUHOR / 32GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 + Aegis 3200 |
Video Card(s) | ASRock RX 6600 / Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580 |
Storage | NVMes, ONLY NVMes / NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe, SATA, external storage |
Display(s) | Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) / 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5 |
Case | Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard |
Audio Device(s) | onboard |
Power Supply | Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W |
Mouse | CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech |
Keyboard | CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech |
Software | Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10 |
They might be able to differentiate that 12 core CCD design and be able to replace those cores with c versions. A CCD with 4 standard cores and 8 c cores could go in laptops and also be the base for APUs. We wouldn't like it as much as a 12 standard cores CCD, but it makes sense considering Intel is selling 10 core CPUs with only 2 P cores. AMD needs to have financially viable alternatives against Intel's CPUs with a gazillion of little cores.Yes, that's possible. But whatever AMD has in its collective mind, I somehow expect them to start making an additional, smaller version of the 12-core CCD, one with 8 or 6 cores. Large cores, not "c", and without the 3D option. The smaller die could go into CPUs and APUs with 4-8 cores. The marginal cost of development, simulation, verification etc. should be low enough to make it worthwhile. It's what Intel did with the 6+0 Alder Lake chip.
To cover more market segments. AMD was selling 4 core CPUs as triple cores or even dual cores back in the AM3 era, 6 cores as 4 cores, even dual cores as single cores. While we are 15 years latter, I guess this could be the case also today, with the only change to not be able to unlock those cores as we could do with AM3 CPUs. Free cores. What a nice era that was...Why selling a perfectly working 8 core or 6 core chip as a 4 core ?