..or that VA panels are just garbage.
As someone who bought the FG2421 when it was released, I agree wholeheartedly. It was reviewed as being the most "CRT-like" monitor released yet, but VA's issues, good god.
VA panels are garbage. Worse than TN, solely because of their off center contrast shift and black crush. Black levels are better, colors are better, but that doesn't matter when the inherent flaws to VA override their benefits.
Stick with TN or IPS. Preferably IPS, but IPS has that 'glow' that also ruins black levels, albeit worse than VA (and especially those with active dithering).
As for everything you've said, I agree 100%: It's not the GPU; it's the monitor itself.
I'm one of the people who made one of those linked threads about my PB298Q:
https://hardforum.com/threads/artifacts-in-dark-scenes.1829007/
Issue:
No issue:
Never found a resolution for it and damn well can't afford getting a new monitor, so I've had to deal with less than stellar performance in dark content media.
I believe the main problem is people aren't educated enough to see things like this either in the first place, or as a problem. I've only found mention about this in a single site review of my monitor; everything else has never mentioned it.
Sure, there's hundreds or even thousands of monitors out there now, all with varying panels and factory settings.. it's hard to find something specific about a specific niche monitor. I assume if 20% of the PC gaming population used a single monitor, there'd be hundreds of posts about this from the people who are more technically savvy.
If it's an issue with quality control and only affects certain monitors (like dead pixels, backlight bleed), then this would be an even more convoluted issue than it is now. I've never been able to test, because who has enough money and time to RMA/buy multiple displays and look for this issue? I sure wish I did..