- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
- Messages
- 14,065 (6.36/day)
- Location
- Midlands, UK
Processor | Various Intel and AMD CPUs |
---|---|
Motherboard | Micro-ATX and mini-ITX |
Cooling | Yes |
Memory | Overclocking is overrated |
Video Card(s) | Various Nvidia and AMD GPUs |
Storage | A lot |
Display(s) | Monitors and TVs |
Case | The smaller the better |
Audio Device(s) | Speakers and headphones |
Power Supply | 300 to 750 W, bronze to gold |
Mouse | Wireless |
Keyboard | Mechanic |
VR HMD | Not yet |
Software | Linux gaming master race |
If it's "being pushed out due to the economics of it", then why should "more people get multi-GPU setups"?Just those modern games supporting DX12 well show its not dead. Just not being pushed due to the economics of it. Once more people get multi-GPU setups and it claws marketshare for 8K gaming, you'll see a resurgence.
Another big question: do you know any modern mainstream platform that natively supports dual x16 PCI-e slots for a multi GPU setup? I don't mean x4 wired into a physical x16 slot, but real x16. Personally, I don't. Ryzen 5000 series chips have 24 lanes, 4 of which go towards the chipset, another 4 to the primary m.2 slot. 11th gen Intel Core has 20 lanes, 4 of which again, go to m.2. 12th gen Core likewise.
Edit: Back in the days, I tried to run my HD 7770 in my motherboard's secondary slot just to see how much bottleneck running it off the chipset instead of the CPU produces. Some games were OK, but some were unplayable. And that's with a (back then) middle-class card. Imagine that with a modern high-performance GPU.
Last edited: