A bit late to the party, but here we go...
Rather then regulating the right to repair, I would have mandated modular designs instead. You know, no more this is glued to that, so they have to be replaced together, no more "tough luck, this laptop came with 4GB of soldered RAM".
Amen. Something like "make it actually
be repairable so the user can take advantage of his right to repair"
But I compare this move to the one that GDPR brought us.
Okay, I understood your point about informing your average citizen about his rights, and although legislators may mean well, in the end my life gets more complicated. What GDPR brought me is the need to click on 267 different items to say that I don't want my data being sold just to check out what the weather will be tomorrow.
Now, of course you'll say "But at least now you have the right to choose" and you'd technically be correct, but the end result is that sites are now cumbersome and obtuse. Would it not have been easier to mandate "opt-out by default" and a less intrusive opt-in? What we have now is madness.
I expect this will be more of the same: sounds like a good idea, but it's not so good in practice.
Yes, in theory it sounds good, like a step in the right direction, but in the end when it's in effect if there are so many omissions and loopholes (be they intentional or unintentional), does it even matter?
I hope that this will at least lead to more component standardization, so that spare part costs can be reduced by having less categories/more reuse between devices.
It's a world I often dream of, but doubt we'll see soon. Have 2-3 models of something instead of 20-30, have as much parts of it be interchangeable, have common standards for common parts etc. Alas, I know that manufacturers have strong lobbies and won't like it if you buy stuff less often.
All regulations & polity are by design entrenched to make the vested interests even more profits, now they could throw a bone or two (to the masses) like this proposed regulation but in the end
IMO the big corps will end up making more money any way!
It's omissions and loopholes like this that make me wonder if the Comission is trolling us or it's just incompetent. You know damn well that Apple is a slippery one, why would you give them room to do what they do best and circumvent your rules?
Hi,
This brings the question who is using a 10 year old device especially cell phone when they're outdated after 4 and battery is crap after 2 maybe 3 at best
Selling/ auto including 10 year warranties will be pretty expensive careful what you ask for EU you guys and gals are already seeing higher prices
Imagine a world where a common smartphone battery standard is a thing and you can easily open the back of your 5-year-old phone and replace the dying battery in a minute. Imagine if the bootloader was mandated to be factory unlocked and you could flash the latest OS of your choice on it. Sounds good, no?
Tbh, I wanted to give away a tablet that was collecting dust in a drawer. Working fine, no repairs needed. Lo and behold, Google Play would want nothing to do with it anymore (even if it was still listed as supported). It would seem we (customers) are up against layered defenses.
xda-developers.com could have a solution. I hope they do at least.
he has been fighting for right to repair really hard so i guess his views have some validity
I love Louis. He may be cynical at times, but seems like he genuinely cares and always has some good points. For those too lazy to watch the video, his points are:
- no mention of parts being available to third-party repair shops (interesting, since I saw spare parts mentioned in the document);
- no mention of making schematics needed for repair purposes available to third-party repair shops;
- no mention of making service software needed to pair parts together available to third-party repair shops (why the hell is this even a thing, Apple?!);
- having to register in a special database and maintain standard contact forms would complicate life for repair guys;
Well, if that sticker is tampered with you loose the warranty in Romania(that somehow is part of the EU). Coincidentally i just got a temporary ban on a local forum a few days ago. For suggesting that there is no reason for a manufacturer to deny the customer to do maintanance, to clean or install custom cooling on his product, in this case GPU. Or a pre-build PC system, to upgrade RAM or add SSD or clean it. The "reasons" i was told to my the mods of that forum, were like reading from a corporate lawyer's playbook, stuff like "you are not an authorized person" or "you don't know what size the thermal pads" are and the classic "it's within specs" even if the bloody vRAM is over 100ºC.
I'm on the fence on this one. On one hand, some users are experts and can often can do a better job than most shops. On the other, others are outright idiots that just break stuff.
The first thing that comes to my mind: if someone wants to claim the warranty on a non-working video card, for example, how do you know if he didn't just brick it by flashing a wrong BIOS without going all forensics detective on it? It could be a legit defective one, but it could also be user error.
Agree, mainly for trying to reduce waste from everyone in the world buying a new "insert tech product here" every year or every other year. THINK ABOUT HOW MUCH JUNK WE HAVE CREATED IN THE PAST DECADE ALONE, from old technology.
Most people I talk to on the matter complain about having a pile of old phones in their drawer collecting dust.
But when put in context next to keeping coal-based power plants up and running and their environmental impact, switching to a new phone or TV less often feels like a drop in the ocean.
Well, it disturbs me when someone repairs a CRT monitor or TV as the power consumption is so much higher than a modern unit, so I'd say some old tech really needs to be retired.
Hey now, keep your filthy mitts off muh little space heater! My room gets quite chilly during the winter!
---
My thoughts on the whole thing: first off, I wholly agree with
@Vayra86 that what needs to change is most importantly people's mindset. For too long people have been conditioned that they need to buy the new thing instead of repairing the old thing and keeping it running. They live with the idea that repair is not sustainable and a new model is the way. Truly, artificially raising the cost of repair and the magic of marketing have zombified them to the point that they don't want to know about repair.
Man is an imperfect beast and the big players take full advantage of his imperfections...
Oh, too difficult to deal with repairing it? Get the new model! Jack has the new model, does it not make you feel bad? Get the new model! Or better yet, buy this now, wait another six months, get the even newer model and rub it all in Jack's face. Think about how good that will feel. Just get the new model!!! Yeesss, that's a good boy...
So is this new legislation the way to go? I really can't be certain. I can only hope that it's one small step in the right direction.
The masses like being told what to like. If sustainable suddenly became the new sexy, people would start caring. But right now they don't. You can try to educate them, but pretty soon they stop listening. No, what we need to do is figure out how to make sustainable the new sexy.
Call me crazy, but I think that with the way the average Joe thinks and acts, a paid campaign where celebrities and influencers (God, I hate that word) start upselling people on the new repairable hotness would prove to be more efficient than EU legislation. I... I think I can see it...
"Hey errybody issyaboy Pnannyslayer69, back wit anutha one of dem block rockin repairable phones. This one be crazy, y'all, you can have the screen replaced for $25 a pop! I dun replaced my screen twice this last week alone cause my hands be always sweaty from holdin' dat paper, mayne! And I dun did it all by myself with just this itty-bitty screwdriver that came included with it! Now that's crazy, son!"
Might just work...