Will reviewers call out the tiny uplift in hardware specs for what it is I wonder? In the mid range 5070, you get single digit uplift in shaders 4.35% and native performance increase won't be more than 10% best case scenario.
Meanwhile Nvidia sell you upscaling and increase their margins...
But who'll tell it how it actually is ?
We're still just speculating if it's 20% faster while being 8% cheaper than the launch 4070 what should a reviewer say.
Or do they compare it to the 4070 super where it'll be barely faster but 8% cheaper...
I lean towards the latter but the people actually interested in this card are 2070/3070 owners who can't afford the 5070ti and won't touch AMD DGPU with a ten foot stick... Honestly I feel bad for them if this is the best Nvidia can do after 4-6 years.
Lets be real though the competition isn't even going to beat last generation cards with the only real improvement being cost potentially.
We are f#$% regardless....
For this reason Unreal Engine 5 should never exist. Only exit is something light with good optimization.
While I don't disagree more games look like they are going ue5 not less....
We will have to wait till release ofc but Black State n the recent DF direct looked like it performed pretty well while looking good apparently the developer is using its own techniques vs relying on nanite.
all nice blabla pr talk I'll wait for the reviews before buying something.
The best course of action since the dawn of time. Although this launch below the 5090 is looking like a yawn fest at least at launch it'll be interesting in 2 years how these have aged. I don't expect the 5070 to age well but would love to be wrong.
It actually may be closer to ~10% gain overall.
