- Joined
- Aug 30, 2006
- Messages
- 7,228 (1.07/day)
System Name | ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH |
---|---|
Processor | Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472 |
Memory | 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM |
Video Card(s) | HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400 |
Display(s) | 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200 |
Audio Device(s) | Audigy 2 |
Software | Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets. |
I've run RAID 1 on my home server/NAS the last 20 years. Every single HDD failure (not total failure, but RAID controller showing errors) has been rebuilt without data loss.IDK I've never had an ssd die on me, even the kingston I bought in 2013. Afaik its still working ( I sold the system it was in not long ago) yet when it comes to hard drives, I've had many fail, especially the shingled ones. I guess its all a crapshoot. You can get lucky, or not so much, either ssd or hdd.
The current SSD issues being discussed in this thread: for critical data (today) I might be more comfortable with a HDD RAID 1, than an SSD RAID 1.
I've got SSDs running that have been in the PCs for years. But I did suffer one catastrophic SSD loss 10 years ago, that made me very cautious. Unlike a HDD fail, where (typically) it degrades but most of the data is still recoverable, my SSD failure was catastrophic and everything went boom.
My main PC is running just a SSD. I am evaluating whether to drop in a second HDD to start mirroring my critical data partition.