System Name | Cosmos F1000 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
Motherboard | MSI PRO B650-S WIFI AM5 |
Cooling | Corsair H100x, Panaflo's on case |
Memory | G.Skill DDR5 Trident 64GB (32GBx2) |
Video Card(s) | MSI Gaming Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6 |
Storage | 4TB Firecuda M.2 2280 |
Display(s) | 32" OLED 4k 240Hz ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCD |
Case | CM Cosmos 1000 |
Audio Device(s) | logitech 5.1 system (midrange quality) |
Power Supply | CORSAIR RM1000e 1000watt |
Mouse | G400s Logitech, white Razor Mamba |
Keyboard | K65 RGB Corsair Tenkeyless Cherry Red MX |
VR HMD | Steam Valve Index |
Software | Win10 Pro, Win11 |
It does look similar to the RE3 remake, but the controls are much better on the RE3 remake. That and RE3 remake had a very low resource requirement on your PC by comparison. SH2 remake is still a great game in my opinion, and has yet to crash on me. It just isn't the game of the year by anyone's measure most likely. SH2 remake really does look better with a high end PC though. Mine handles it well with FSR3 ultra performance in 4k 60fps at all times, hardware ray tracing off and all other settings turned up.This is definitely a newer game that looks like it belongs in a PS4, not with these huge performance requirements.
Very disappointing, even the character models are quite basic for this day and age. (RE3 + 3 look quite a lot better than this)
System Name | Cyberdyne Systems Core |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Sceptre 9 3950x Quantum neural processor (384 nodes) |
Motherboard | Cyberdyne X1470 |
Memory | 128TB QRAM |
Video Card(s) | CDS Render Accelerator 4TB |
Storage | SK 16EB NVMe PCI-E 9.0 x8 |
Display(s) | LG C19 3D Environment Projection System |
Power Supply | Compact Fusion Cell |
Software | Skysoft Skynet |
Do they though? I mean this game it's worse for AMD. But there's plenty where it's the other way around. Seems to favour NV more but the difference usually isn't as drastic as it is in this. A 7800XT usually is around 4070 level in most games. A 7900XTX is usually around 4080 or 4080 Super level in games. There's always then gonna be the bunch of outliers than run better on one of the other.-Right but I was specifically speaking to AMD optimization. Who cares what the PS4's power level is, the point is the games that come to PC still tend to perform better on NV hardware despite being built for AMD hardware in the consoles.
-Would be nice if we could get a revisit of some of these games 1 year out from launch. Not everyone buys day of, and a significant number of people wait till they get snag a complete edition for $10.
System Name | 2rd-hand Hand-me-down V2.0, Mk. 3 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen R5-5500 |
Motherboard | ASRock X370 |
Cooling | Wraith Spire |
Memory | 2 x 16Gb G.Skill @ 3200Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Power Color RX 5700 XT |
Storage | 500 Gb Crucial MX500, 2Tb WD SA510 |
Display(s) | Acer 24.0" CB2 1080p |
Case | (early) DeepCool |
Audio Device(s) | Ubiquitous Realtek |
Power Supply | 650W FSP |
Mouse | Logitech |
Keyboard | Logitech |
VR HMD | What? |
Software | Yes |
Benchmark Scores | [REDACTED] |
Pretty sure Epic and Nvidia have been absolutely joined at the hip since at least UE2. Remember the "Way it's meant to be played" splash when starting Unreal Tournament 2004? I don't think anything has changed since...Unreal Engine for a long time has favored Nvidia over AMD. Even Unreal Engine 3 was announced and showcased in partnership with Nvidia.