Unigine Superposition Benchmark - post your results!

[Kanan]

When you are benchmarking, typically, the object is to score the highest within a certain set of rules. Killing useless backround apps are one method to increase you score, albeit not by much. MSI AB is constantly pinging the card/system to give you all those readings...makes sense it gives a negligibly noticeable increase in some benchmarks.

Yeah anyone knows that. My comment was specifically about MSI AB/RivaTunerSS in particular because those programs are not supposed to draw (some) performance. And again, observation and overclocking tools are not "useless" - so your comment is still off as far as I'm concerned.

 

[EarthDog]

They are, and do, is all i was saying. Im not surprised as this is WHY you dont run those programs, when benchmarking, after setting clocks.

Useless for your final run may bring clarity to where im coming from. Its good to run and get temps and clocks...etc...etc when you are putzing around to find clock limits, of course (why do i feel i had to say that ). But when it comes to getting the best scores, those applications shouldnt be used (againd after you set the clocks), for whatever (little) that is worth. Its no surprise.

 

[Kanan]

Yeah we will see. I'm about to upgrade my GPU anyway, so a rebench is already ordered.

 

[Frito11]

6424 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2126 MHz |1525 mhz memory (according to GPU-Z no idea what is real is so confusing afterburner and benchmark reports 6102 mhz)

 

[Frito11]

10219 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2126 MHz |1525 mhz

 

[the54thvoid]

Ran the medium preset and GPU usage went tumbling. Scored 19394, which puts me below cards I beat at extreme settings - Need a second CPU for mediocre detail benchmarks!

 

[mdbrotha03]

don't think I can push the memory much further than this. Core tapped out a long time ago

6238/ mdbrotha03 / Intel i7-7700k 4.5/ Asus ROG Strix 1080 Ti @ 2050 Boost / Memory Clock 1535 MHz Extreme

10159 / mdbrotha03 / Intel i7-7700k 4.5/ Asus ROG Strix 1080 Ti @ 2050 Boost / Memory Clock 1535 MHz 4k Optimized

 

[erixx]

9765 | Erixx | i7 6850K @ 4.0GHz | nV GTX 1080 Ti FE +EK | 2050 MHz |1405 mhz

 

[Petar666]

4719| Petar666| RYZEN7 1700X @ 3.8GHz | nV GTX 1080 CS | 2138 MHz |1396 mhz

4719| Petar666| RYZEN7 1700X @ 3.8GHz | nV GTX 1080 CS | 2138 MHz |1396 mhz

 

[P4-630]

14106 | P4-630 | i5 6500 @ 3.6GHz | MSI GTX1070 Gaming X @ 2050MHz | 2415MHz

 

[rtwjunkie]

8087 / rtwjunkie / i3-4160 @ 3.6GHz / Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1306MHz / 2000MHz

5722 / rtwjunkie / i3-4160 @ 3.6GHz / Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1306MHz / 2000MHz

 

[Frito11]

22905 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2114 MHz |1525 mhz memory

17122 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2114 MHz |1525 mhz memory

4714 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2025 MHz |1525 mhz memory

had to lower core clock slightly for these runs to make it settings seem to greatly effect stability at top end OC's 8k optimized was untouched in OC settings but realistic clocks were around 2025 mhz ish as it constantly was hitting power limit and core clocks and voltage were always fluctuating, heres some screen caps with afterburner graph logging from these runs

 

[rtwjunkie]

Updated and improved 980Ti scores:

12561 / rtwjunkie / i7-3770k@4.2GHz / MSI 980Ti @1310Mhz (actual boost clock) / 1753Mhz

9014 / rtwjunkie / i7-3770k@4.2GHz / MSI 980Ti @1310Mhz (actual boost clock) / 1753Mhz

3727 / rtwjunkie / i7-3770k@4.2GHz / MSI 980Ti @1310Mhz (actual boost clock) / 1753Mhz

 

[SpartanM07]

6744 / SpartanM07 / i7 3770K 4.0GHz / Nvidia Titan Xp @ 2063MHz / Memory @ 1426MHz

6479 / SpartanM07 / FX-9370 4.4Ghz / Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) @ 2012MHz / Memory @ 1376MHz

 

[Kanan]

6424 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2126 MHz |1525 mhz memory (according to GPU-Z no idea what is real is so confusing afterburner and benchmark reports 6102 mhz)

Perfectly fine if you divide it by 4.

Ran the medium preset and GPU usage went tumbling. Scored 19394, which puts me below cards I beat at extreme settings - Need a second CPU for mediocre detail benchmarks!

If you want to have that included, tell me.

Asus B350 Plus /RYZEN 7 1700X 3.8 /EVGA SC 1080 2138/11200/ G.Skill Trident Z 16GB/3200

Look at the rules, please give me correct formating/information.

22905 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2114 MHz |1525 mhz memory

17122 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2114 MHz |1525 mhz memory

4714 | Frito11 | i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz | Asus 1080 Ti FE Watercooled 2025 MHz |1525 mhz memory

had to lower core clock slightly for these runs to make it settings seem to greatly effect stability at top end OC's 8k optimized was untouched in OC settings but realistic clocks were around 2025 mhz ish as it constantly was hitting power limit and core clocks and voltage were always fluctuating, heres some screen caps with afterburner graph logging from these runs

New records for 1080p Med, High and 8K Optimized. Well done

Updated and improved 980Ti scores:

12561 / rtwjunkie / i7-3770k@4.2GHz / MSI 980Ti @1310Mhz (actual boost clock) / 1753Mhz

9014 / rtwjunkie / i7-3770k@4.2GHz / MSI 980Ti @1310Mhz (actual boost clock) / 1753Mhz

3727 / rtwjunkie / i7-3770k@4.2GHz / MSI 980Ti @1310Mhz (actual boost clock) / 1753Mhz

Try higher clocks and try vram overclocking if you like.

---

Updated. @SpartanM07 you're #1 again on 1080p Extreme. "Day of records" today it seems.

 

[_MissBehave_]

So i got a Samsung 4k Screen today!!!!! So here's my 4k Optimised score:

6135|_MissBehave_|4.5Ghz i5 4690k|980Ti 1466Mhz (Boost)|2000MHz

 

[erixx]

Thread must be hell for the cool organiser Kanan. I will gladly rerun it at whatever settings once one setting for all is determinated.

 

[shonik]

10097|shonik|i7 6900k 4.4 GHz|1080Ti Nvidia FE Custom Watercooled @ 2050-2100 MHz (actual boost clock, fluctuated during benchmark...) | 1599.7MHz

p.s. not sure why the 4.4 on my CPU isn't showing up in the benchmark, but CPUZ reports the multiplier at 44x during benchmarking, so it was definitely running at 4.4Ghz, and NOT 3.2...

 

[rtwjunkie]

p.s. not sure why the 4.4 on my CPU isn't showing up in the benchmark, but CPUZ reports the multiplier at 44x during benchmarking, so it was definitely running at 4.4Ghz, and NOT 3.2.

It doesn't ever show anything but stock CPU, which is why Kanan wants your CPU clock.

 

[_MissBehave_]

It doesn't ever show anything but stock CPU, which is why Kanan wants your CPU clock.

Oddly on my results it does show my CPU overclock speed.....weird.

 

[Slizzo]

@Kanan - Hey man, there's an extra column on the 4K Optimized charts.

 

[rtwjunkie]

Just for giggles added an Extreme run to my RX 480 listing.

2422 / rtwjunkie / i3-4160 @ 3.6GHz / Sapphire RX480 Nitro+ 8GB @ 1306MHz / 2000MHz

 

[aGeoM]

8825|aGeoM|Ryzen 7 1700 3.925GHz|AMD RX480@580 @ 1411 MHz|Memory clock 2250 MHz

6245|aGeoM|Ryzen 7 1700 3.925GHz|AMD RX480@580 @ 1411 MHz|Memory clock 2250 MHz

2620|aGeoM|Ryzen 7 1700 3.925GHz|AMD RX480@580 @ 1411 MHz|Memory clock 2250 MHz

 

[Kanan]

Thread must be hell for the cool organiser Kanan. I will gladly rerun it at whatever settings once one setting for all is determinated.

hahaha, it's pretty much okay up until now. Just sometimes I'm tired and forcing myself to do it, because usually I start late.

@Kanan - Hey man, there's an extra column on the 4K Optimized charts.

Fixed, thanks.

Updated.

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

FWIW

i ran the bench on Windows 7

60 pt gain in medium
70 pt loss in high
52 pt loss in extreme

so

one or two per cent either way