Unigine Superposition Benchmark - post your results!

[Sirillya]

10141|Sirillya|i7 4790K STOCK|NVIDIA ASUS STRIX OC 1080 TI X Pascal @ 2088 Hz|1443 MHz

16626|Sirillya|i7 4790K STOCK|NVIDIA ASUS STRIX OC 1080 TI X Pascal @ 2088 Hz|1443 MHz

6209|Sirillya|i7 4790K@4.6NVIDIA ASUS STRIX OC 1080 TI X Pascal @ 2088 Hz|1443 MHz

 

[twicksisted]

15773 - twicksisted / i7 2600k 4.0GHz / Palit 1080 @ ACTUAL 1911 MHz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 5005 MHz

 

[Icywolfe]

5962|Icywolfe|AMD R7 1800x 3.90 GHz| Nvidia 1080ti FE @ 2037 | Memory Clock 2772MHz

 

[Nuckles56]

I rebenched it somewhat today after I had a nice cold room (15 degrees C) this morning so I had a bit more thermal headroom then usual so I decided to push my card to the limit and I got 1450MHz core stable enough to manage to benchmark, but I needed +130mV to manage it. A water block would be nice for this card as it needs better cooling and it would go a lot higher.

1080p medium
8565 - Nuckles56 / i5 6500 3.2 GHz / Sapphire RX 480 Nitro 4GB @ 1450 MHz / 1889 MHz

1080p Extreme
2619 - Nuckles56 / i5 6500 3.2 GHz / Sapphire RX 480 Nitro 4GB @ 1450 MHz / 1889 MHz

 

[The Pack]

4070-The Pack; i7 6850K @ 4.4GHz; Asus Strix GTX 1070O8G @ 2151Mhz Memory 2452Mhz 1080p Extreme

10634-The Pack; i7 6850K @ 4.4GHz; Asus Strix GTX 1070O8G @ 2151Mhz Memory 2452Mhz 1080p High

14775-The Pack i7 6850K @ 4,4Ghz Asus Strix GTX 1070 O8G 2151MHz / 2462MHz Memory (2151/9850) 1080p Medium

 

[Hakaru]

2773 - R7-1700x @ 3.8ghz - Asus strix Rx580 @ 1510 core & 2250 mem - 1080 Extreme.

 

[Kanan]

14692-The Pack; i7 6850K @ 4.4GHz; Asus Strix GTX 1070O8G @ 2151Mhz Memory 2452Mhz 1080p MediumView attachment 87197

No doubleposts/edit your posts.

Updated.

 

[cdawall]

I know Kanan wont post it since he deleted me off of the charts, but here you go anyway. Need to swap out the weaker of these two for my GB card and go again.

1080P Extreme SLi

8443|cdawall|5960X 4.4GHz|(2)EVGA 980Ti Classified@ 1506-1531 MHz| 2000 Mhz

 

[EarthDog]

Why were you deleted off the chart? You bork your format or picture or use a tweak??

 

[cdawall]

Why were you deleted off the chart?

Because he is mad at me from calling the 1080 a midrange card and this appears to be the childish response he has chosen to make.

 

[Kanan]

Because he is mad at me from calling the 1080 a midrange card and this appears to be the childish response he has chosen to make.

Yeah please keep out of my thread your childish debate / childish stuff or I'll call a mod. Kthanks. That was just a first reaction, to such a bad and manipulative human being as you are.

Also trolling in a post, knowing I won't post your stuff, and still posting it, is deliberately calling for an unwanted argument. I'll strictly report everything you do here.

 

[cdawall]

Yeah please keep out of my thread your childish debate / childish stuff or I'll call a mod. Kthanks. That was just a first reaction, to such a bad human being as you are.

Go right ahead. I wasn't trying to rile anything up, that was my opinion of the situation. You have absolutely no other reason to delete me off of the charts. That is childish behavior, my post was in line with the thread, as were the others that you decided to delete.

 

[Kanan]

Alright guys, destroy this thread if you want. I congratulate you already. I expected nothing else.

PS. I won't include persons here that harshly insulted me in the past. Nobody else was deleted.

 

[cdawall]

Alright guys, destroy this thread if you want. I congratulate you already. I expected nothing else.

Just be an adult and add the forum members to the chart. No one is trying to destroy the work you are trying to do.

 

[HammerON]

Enough folks. Warnings issued. Play nice or move along.

 

[cdawall]

to get onto subject. This appears to have been heavily temperature throttled

1080P Extreme SLi

11009|cdawall|5960X 4.5GHz|(3)980Ti @ 1416-1219 MHz| 2003 Mhz

 

[Tomgang]

Joining the fun with my old X58 rig. So can grandpa here cripple and in he´s wheelchair do any good. Let me know cause this benchmark is new to me and i dont know how scores compare.

15487|Tomgang|i7 980X 4.25 GHz|2 x Zotac GTX 970 @ Base/boost 1296-1436 MHz|1933 MHz

12021|Tomgang|i7 980X 4.25 GHz|2 x Zotac GTX 970 @ Base/boost 1276-1416 MHz|1933 MHz

12021|Tomgang|i7 980X 4.25 GHz|2 x Zotac GTX 970 @ Base/boost 1276-1416 MHz|1933 MHz
How in the dam hell is 1080P extreme more killing than 4K? just dosent make sence to me.

12021|Tomgang|i7 980X 4.25 GHz|2 x Zotac GTX 970 @ Base/boost 1276-1416 MHz|1933 MHz

well 8K forget that. GTX 970 where never intended for that and with only 4 Gb vram it is not a smart way to go.

 

[cdawall]

How in the dam hell is 1080P extreme more killing than 4K? just dosent make sence to me.

The 4k result has much lower settings, think of 1080p extreme using all ultra settings and the 4k one using medium with no aa/af.

Out of curiosity were you seeing 100% load on those gpus?

 

[Tomgang]

The 4k result has much lower settings, think of 1080p extreme using all ultra settings and the 4k one using medium with no aa/af.

Out of curiosity were you seeing 100% load on those gpus?

Ah i see so 4K test is more a higher resolution but with less eye candy on than 1080P extreme preset.

Yes i where most of the time seing 100 % load on GPU´s. Never dropped under 90 % and most of the time at 95 % to 100 % load.

 

[cdawall]

Ah i see so 4K test is more a higher resolution but with less eye candy on than 1080P extreme preset.

Yes i where most of the time seing 100 % load on GPU´s. Never dropped under 90 % and most of the time at 95 % to 100 % load.

OK just curious I did some testing at different clockspeeds and had some heavily varied gpu usages. Was just curious if that 980x could still fill the gpus in this test.

 

[Tomgang]

OK just curious I did some testing at different clockspeeds and had some heavily varied gpu usages. Was just curious if that 980x could still fill the gpus in this test.

To my surprise to it dit feed the GPU´s very well. 1080P medium realy surpriced me cause there its tend to be the cpu that are the limited factor. But the cpu dit well and in most games aswell. It feeds GPU´s just fine.
I think i have a perfect match here with I7 980X at 4.25 GHz and GTX 970 SLI. But i dont think Titan XP sli is a good idea

 

[The Pack]

No doubleposts/edit your posts.

Updated.

Ok,i'm sorry. I've got deleted the other post. Thanks

 

[Frito11]

The 4k result has much lower settings, think of 1080p extreme using all ultra settings and the 4k one using medium with no aa/af.

Out of curiosity were you seeing 100% load on those gpus?

the load on the gpu(s) in general varies quite a lot between the default preset settings to run, i learned this when doing my max oc runs i was able to clock my core higher at 1080p extreme and 4k optimal as they are the hardest two on core (esp extreme) but in other settings i had to lower cores to become stable but still pulled in nice figures on 8k i'm guessing due to good luck of the draw on my memory being decent at OC'ing.

 

[toilet pepper]

3667 Toilet_Pepper CPU FX 8320 @ 4.3 GHz| GTX Palit Gamerock (Gainward HoF bios) 1070 @ 2036 MHz (actual boost clock) | Memory clock 4252 MHz

3722 Toilet_Pepper CPU R5 1600 @ 3.2 GHz (stock) | GTX Palit Gamerock (Gainward HoF bios) 1070 @ 2036 MHz (actual boost clock) | Memory clock 4252 MHz

I figured this benchmark is more GPU bound than CPU.

Edit: Corrected scores

 

[cdawall]

the load on the gpu(s) in general varies quite a lot between the default preset settings to run, i learned this when doing my max oc runs i was able to clock my core higher at 1080p extreme and 4k optimal as they are the hardest two on core (esp extreme) but in other settings i had to lower cores to become stable but still pulled in nice figures on 8k i'm guessing due to good luck of the draw on my memory being decent at OC'ing.

I only asked because with a, 3820k@stock my score was 300pts lower and showed only 85-95% usage most of the benchmark when using a fury.