cdawall
where the hell are my stars
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Messages
- 27,680 (4.10/day)
- Location
- Houston
System Name | All the cores |
---|---|
Processor | 2990WX |
Motherboard | Asrock X399M |
Cooling | CPU-XSPC RayStorm Neo, 2x240mm+360mm, D5PWM+140mL, GPU-2x360mm, 2xbyski, D4+D5+100mL |
Memory | 4x16GB G.Skill 3600 |
Video Card(s) | (2) EVGA SC BLACK 1080Ti's |
Storage | 2x Samsung SM951 512GB, Samsung PM961 512GB |
Display(s) | Dell UP2414Q 3840X2160@60hz |
Case | Caselabs Mercury S5+pedestal |
Audio Device(s) | Fischer HA-02->Fischer FA-002W High edition/FA-003/Jubilate/FA-011 depending on my mood |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime 1200w |
Mouse | Thermaltake Theron, Steam controller |
Keyboard | Keychron K8 |
Software | W10P |
Yes exactly I admit I'm no expert on the particulars of bandwidth versus signal timing versus ham sandwiches. I just know they qualified the statement and said you may not get a full 3.0 performance essentially and that results vary whatever the actual "results" are I have no idea they don't say. Yeah, I can honestly say I have clocked the heck out of every cpu at some point and gone for max clocks and usually do a lot of stress testing with very high memory mhz and I usually keep my cpu running at the highest stable clock I'm comfortable with; that said I've never noticed any degradation in a single cpu from fx-55 to core 2 duo e8600 to this ES 3960x equivalent...only thing that has degraded or died on me is a few sticks of memory and one or two motherboards just quit working which I believe was the motherboard or some circuitry on it just died.
I have degraded tons of CPU's my Phenom II 945 wouldn't even run stock clocks at stock voltage after running about a year at 1.55v