Report an Error
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- Graphics Processor
- GK104
- Cores
- 960
- TMUs
- 80
- ROPs
- 32
- Memory Size
- 4 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Bus Width
- 256 bit
GPU
Recommended Gaming Resolutions:
- 1366x768
- 1600x900
- 1920x1080
The Quadro K4000M was a professional mobile graphics chip by NVIDIA, launched on June 1st, 2012. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the GK104 graphics processor, in its N14E-Q3-A2 variant, the chip supports DirectX 12. The GK104 graphics processor is an average sized chip with a die area of 294 mm² and 3,540 million transistors. Unlike the fully unlocked GeForce GTX 680, which uses the same GPU but has all 1536 shaders enabled, NVIDIA has disabled some shading units on the Quadro K4000M to reach the product's target shader count. It features 960 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. NVIDIA has paired 4 GB GDDR5 memory with the Quadro K4000M, which are connected using a 256-bit memory interface. The GPU is operating at a frequency of 601 MHz, which can be boosted up to 601 MHz, memory is running at 700 MHz (2.8 Gbps effective).
Being a mxm module card, the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M does not require any additional power connector, its power draw is rated at 100 W maximum. This device has no display connectivity, as it is not designed to have monitors connected to it. Rather it is intended for use in laptop/notebooks and will use the output of the host mobile device.
Being a mxm module card, the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M does not require any additional power connector, its power draw is rated at 100 W maximum. This device has no display connectivity, as it is not designed to have monitors connected to it. Rather it is intended for use in laptop/notebooks and will use the output of the host mobile device.
Graphics Processor
Mobile Graphics
- Release Date
- Jun 1st, 2012
- Generation
-
Quadro Kepler-M
(Kx000M)
- Predecessor
- Quadro Fermi-M
- Successor
- Quadro Maxwell-M
- Production
- End-of-life
- Bus Interface
- MXM-B (3.0)
- Reviews
- 26 in our database
Relative Performance
Based on TPU review data: "Performance Summary" at 1920x1080, 4K for 2080 Ti and faster.
Performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks.
Clock Speeds
- Base Clock
- 601 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 601 MHz
- Memory Clock
-
700 MHz
2.8 Gbps effective
Memory
- Memory Size
- 4 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Memory Bus
- 256 bit
- Bandwidth
- 89.60 GB/s
Render Config
- Shading Units
- 960
- TMUs
- 80
- ROPs
- 32
- SMX Count
- 5
- L1 Cache
- 16 KB (per SMX)
- L2 Cache
- 512 KB
Theoretical Performance
- Pixel Rate
- 12.02 GPixel/s
- Texture Rate
- 48.08 GTexel/s
- FP32 (float)
- 1,154 GFLOPS
- FP64 (double)
- 48.08 GFLOPS (1:24)
Board Design
- Slot Width
- MXM Module
- TDP
- 100 W
- Outputs
- Portable Device Dependent
- Power Connectors
- None
- Board Number
- P2051B SKU 502
Graphics Features
- DirectX
- 12 (11_0)
- OpenGL
- 4.6
- OpenCL
- 3.0
- Vulkan
- 1.2.175
- CUDA
- 3.0
- Shader Model
- 6.5 (5.1)
GK104 GPU Notes
| NVENC: 1st Gen NVDEC: 1st Gen PureVideo HD: VP5 VDPAU: Feature Set D L1 Cache is configurable from 16 KB up to 48 KB per SMX Latest Drivers: Windows XP / Server 2003 x64: Quadro Release R319 U2 (321.01) Windows Vista: GeForce Release 365.19 Quadro Release R346 U7 (348.40) / R352 BETA (352.86) Windows 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10 / 11 (x32 / x64): GeForce Release 391.35 / 475.06 Quadro Release R390 U9 (392.37) / R470 U16 (474.82) Data Center Release 427.11 Tesla Release 441.22 Windows 10 / 11 x64: GeForce Release 475.06 Quadro Release R470 U16 (474.82) Data Center Release 474.82 |
Nov 5th, 2024 18:27 EST
change timezone
Latest GPU Drivers
New Forum Posts
- Are the 2 mentioned monitors a good upgrade over my current one? (6)
- 2022-X58/1366 PIN Motherboards NVME M.2 SSD BIOS MOD Collection (760)
- What are you playing? (22122)
- 5950x/5900x on a low end trash mb-black friday sale (6)
- E-cores still evolve. But is there a reason for it? (112)
- Laptop battery degrading or charger issue (9)
- Ryzen 7950X on air..? (38)
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard performance analysis (40)
- New RTX 5090 + 9800X3D build: ASUS TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI a good choice? (59)
- Post your Anvil's Storage score for SSD (37)
Popular Reviews
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard Performance Benchmark Review
- SilverStone SETA A2 Review
- DDR5 Memory Performance Scaling with AMD Zen 5
- Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 Performance Benchmark Review - AMD FTW
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review
- Ocypus Iota C70 BK ARGB Review
- G-Wolves Hati-R 8K Review
- Enermax PlatiGemini 1200 W Review
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265K Review
- I\OAudio SOGNO In-Ear Monitors Review - 2 DD, 6 BA, All Harman
Controversial News Posts
- AMD Falling Behind: Radeon dGPUs Absent from Steam's Top 20 (170)
- Quick Denuvo DRM Cracks Cost Game Publishers 20% in Revenue, According to Study (136)
- AMD Introduces Next-Generation AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor, $479, Nov 7 (124)
- MSI OCLab Reveals Ryzen 9000X3D 11-13% Faster Than 7000X3D, AMD Set to Dominate "Arrow Lake" in Gaming (123)
- Apple and Samsung in the Fray to Acquire Intel: Rumor (121)
- AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Comes with 120W TDP, 5.20 GHz Boost, All Specs Leaked (120)
- Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K Performance Claims Leaked, Doesn't Beat i9-14900K at Gaming (114)
- NVIDIA Tunes GeForce RTX 5080 GDDR7 Memory to 32 Gbps, RTX 5070 Launches at CES (112)