The Strix Impact III is equipped with the PixArt PAW3311. According to specifications, the 3311 is capable of up to 12,000 CPI, as well as a maximum tracking speed of 300 IPS, which equals 7.62 m/s. Out of the box, four pre-defined CPI steps are available: 400, 800, 1600, and 3200.
CPI Accuracy
"CPI" (short for counts per inch) describes the number of counts registered by the mouse if it is moved exactly an inch. There are several factors (firmware, mounting height of the sensor not meeting specifications, mouse feet thickness, mousing surface, among others) which may contribute to nominal CPI not matching actual CPI. It is impossible to always achieve a perfect match, but ideally, nominal and actual CPI should differ as little as possible. In this test, I'm determining whether this is the case or not. However, please keep in mind that said variance will still differ from unit to unit, so your mileage may vary.
I've restricted my testing to the four most common CPI steps, which are 400, 800, 1600, and 3200. As you can see, deviation is nonexistent, which is a perfect result. Interestingly, Armoury Crate allows for CPI adjustment in increments of 50, despite the 3311 nominally not supporting it.
Motion Delay
"Motion delay" encompasses all kinds of sensor lag. Any further sources of input delay will not be recorded in this test. The main thing I'll be looking for in this test is sensor smoothing, which describes an averaging of motion data across several capture frames in order to reduce jitter at higher CPI values, increasing motion delay along with it. The goal here is to have as little smoothing as possible. As there is no way to accurately measure motion delay absolutely, it can only be done by comparison with a control subject that has been determined to have the lowest possible motion delay. In this case, the control subject is a G403, whose 3366 has no visible smoothing across the entire CPI range. Note that the G403 is moved first and thus receives a slight head start.
First, I'm looking at two xCounts plots—generated at 1600 and 12,000 CPI—to quickly gauge whether there is any smoothing, which would be indicated by any visible "kinks." Such kinks are plainly visible in the second plot, indicating smoothing at that step.
In order to determine motion delay, I'm looking at xSum plots generated at 1600, 2500, and 12,000 CPI. The line further to the left denotes the sensor with less motion delay. There is no motion delay differential at 1600 CPI. At and above 2500 CPI, smoothing is first applied, resulting in a motion delay differential of roughly 4 ms, which holds true all the way until 12,000 CPI.
Speed-Related Accuracy Variance (SRAV)
What people typically mean when they talk about "acceleration" is speed-related accuracy variance (or SRAV for short). It's not about the mouse having a set amount of inherent positive or negative acceleration, but about the cursor not traveling the same distance if the mouse is moved the same physical distance at different speeds. The easiest way to test this is by comparison with a control subject that is known to have very low SRAV, which in this case is the G403. As you can see from the plot, no displacement between the two cursor paths can be observed, which confirms that SRAV is very low.
Perfect Control Speed
Perfect Control Speed (or PCS for short) is the maximum speed up to which the mouse and its sensor can be moved without the sensor malfunctioning in any way. I've only managed to hit a measly 5 m/s, which is within the proclaimed PCS range and shows no sign of the sensor malfunctioning.
Polling Rate Stability
All of the available polling rate settings (125, 250, 500, and 1000 Hz) look and perform fine. Polling stability is unaffected by any of the available RGB lighting effects.
Paint Test
This test is used to indicate any potential issues with angle snapping (non-native straightening of linear motion) and jitter, along with any sensor lens rattle. As you can see, no issues with angle snapping can be observed. 1600 CPI shows no jitter. Neither does 2450 CPI, which is the highest step without smoothing, and this continues to be the case at 2500 CPI, where smoothing is first applied. 12,000 CPI shows moderate jitter. Lastly, there is no lens movement.
Lift-off Distance
The Strix Impact III does not offer any LOD adjustment. This is expected, as the 3311 sensor lacks this functionality. The sensor tracks at a height of 1 DVD, but not at a height of 2 DVDs (1.2<x<2.4 mm; x=LOD height). Keep in mind that LOD may vary slightly depending on the mousing surface (pad) it is being used on.
Click Latency
In most computer mice, debouncing is required to avoid double clicks, slam-clicks, or other unintended effects of switch bouncing. Debouncing typically adds a delay, which, along with any potential processing delay, shall be referred to as click latency. In order to measure click latency, the mouse has been interfaced with an NVIDIA LDAT (Latency Display Analysis Tool). Many thanks go to NVIDIA for providing an LDAT device. More specifically, the LDAT measures the time between the electrical activation of the left main button and the OS receiving the button-down message. Unless noted otherwise, the values presented in the graph refer to the lowest click latency possible on the mouse in question. If a comparison mouse is capable of both wired and wireless operation, only the result for wireless (2.4 GHz) operation will be listed.
Click latency has been measured to be 0.4 ms, with standard deviation being 0.19 ms.