Shape

As the name already suggests, the Xlite V2 Mini Wireless is a smaller Xlite V2 Wireless. Whereas the original Xlite sits somewhere between the Zowie EC1 and EC2 in terms of size, the Mini is smaller than the EC2. Compared to the Glorious Model D-, the Mini is slightly smaller, but the left side is raised higher, much like on the EC series. Unlike the EC3, the Mini has simply been uniformly scaled down from the Xlite. Hence, aside from the difference in size, the Mini is very much the same shape as the Xlite: raised left side, centered hump that slopes down gradually towards both ends, left side that curves inwards, and right side that curves outwards towards the back. The main buttons still feature subtle comfort grooves, too. The changes to the shell design first introduced on the Xlite V2 Wireless are retained on the Mini, which means the sides are solid instead of perforated, and there is more of a traditional bottom plate.


As for grip styles, I'd say the Xlite V2 Mini Wireless mostly suits palm and claw grip, with fingertip grip being a possibility for larger hands. It is a medium to small mouse with a moderately pronounced hump, which should make it generally suit most hand sizes. For reference, my hands are 19 cm long and 10 cm wide, and I found the Xlite V2 Mini Wireless very comfortable in claw grip.

Dimensions

This table includes the dimensions of the Pulsar Xlite V2 Mini Wireless and several other ambidextrous mice. "Front height" denotes the distance between the base and main buttons. Measurements with two decimals have been taken with a caliper, while those with one decimal have been taken with a ruler. For a full list of all measurements taken, please refer to this sheet compiled by an esteemed community member.


Below are some comparison shots with each of the measured mice:


Pulsar Xlite V2 Wireless


Xtrfy M4 Wireless


SteelSeries Prime Mini Wireless


Cooler Master MM731


Glorious Model D- Wireless