Wednesday, June 14th 2023

US Patent Office Sides with Intel in the $2.2 Billion VLSI Case

The U.S. Patent Office tribunal has ruled in favor of Intel Corp in a significant $2.2 billion case against VLSI Technology LLC. Intel's bid to nullify a patent that constituted $1.5 billion of a $2.18 billion verdict it previously lost to VLSI in 2021 was accepted. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidated the computer chip-related patent and another VLSI patent, accounting for the rest of the Texas federal court verdict. An Intel spokesperson expressed their satisfaction with the decision, criticizing the invalidated VLSI patents as "low-quality."

VLSI, the company holding the patent that has filed several infringement lawsuits against Intel, retains the option to appeal both decisions to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In a separate case last year, VLSI secured a verdict worth $949 million against Intel in Texas. VLSI is a subsidiary of Fortress Investment Group, which is managed by investment funds from SoftBank Group. The patent board proceeding was initiated by South Dakota-based Patent Quality Assurance LLC, while another patent from the $2.18 billion verdict was contested by OpenSky Industries LLC. Despite initial sanctions for attempting to extort both Intel and VLSI, OpenSky was permitted to continue the proceeding with Intel at the helm.
Source: Reuters
Add your own comment

2 Comments on US Patent Office Sides with Intel in the $2.2 Billion VLSI Case

#1
LabRat 891
Well, at least it's fairly easy to feel indifferent.
VLSI is a subsidiary of Fortress Investment Group, which is managed by investment funds from SoftBank Group
This is merely two 'big boys on the block'; neither has any problem lying re-construing the truth, or playing-the-bully.

Yet another "no good guys" situation,
and probably another case where neither party was (completely) 'In the Right'.

:shadedshu:
Posted on Reply
#2
Tomorrow
Going against Intel in court?

Good luck ever seeing a dime. Intel has never payed a cent they were ordered to pay to AMD for their practices during the Pentium era (bribing OEM's to not use AMD etc).
Posted on Reply
May 21st, 2024 19:12 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts