Friday, September 11th 2009

AMD Cypress ''Radeon HD 5870'' Stripped

Here are the first pictures of the obverse side of Cypress' PCB, and the first pictures of the centre of attraction: the AMD Cypress GPU. CzechGamer dissembled two Cypress "Radeon HD 5870" cards for a quick blurrycam photo-session. The PCB shot reveals quite a bit about Cypress, particularly about the GPU.

To begin with, the GPU is AMD's overhaul on transistor counts, and a bold work of engineering on the 40 nm manufacturing process, given the kind of problems foundry partners had initially. Apparently they seem to have recovered with most of them, as AMD's AIB partners are coming up with new products based on the 40 nm RV740 GPU on a weekly basis. The package holds a "diamond-shaped" die that is angled in a way similar to RV740, RV730, or more historically, the R600. The seemingly huge die measures 338 mm² (area), and for 40 nm, it translates to "huge", and is vindicated by the transistor count of ~2.1 billion. In contrast, AMD's older flagship GPU, the RV790 holds 959 million, and NVIDIA's GT200 holds 1.4 billion.
The PCB has three distinct areas: the connectivity, processing, and VRM. To fuel the GPU is a high-grade 4 phase digital PWM power circuit, while the PCB has placeholders for an additional vGPU phase. The 8 (or 16 on the 2 GB model) memory chips, is powered by a 2 phase circuit. Power is drawn from two 6-pin PCI-Express power connectors, but there seems to be a placeholder for two more pins, i.e., to replace one of those 6-pin connectors with an 8-pin one. Bordering the GPU on two sides are the 8 GDDR5 memory chips, which AMD calls says is generation ahead of present GDDR5, and supports reference frequencies as high as 1300 MHz (2600 MHz DDR, 5.20 GHz effective). In the 2 GB variant, 8 more chips seat on the other side of the PCB. This is what perhaps, the backplate is intended to cool. On the connectivity portion of it, are the two CrossFire connectors, DisplayPort, HDMI and a cluster of two DVI-D connectors. There has been a raging debate about how adversely the small air vent would affect the card, but AMD is promising some energy efficiency breakthroughs, plus given how roomy the card is, the vent seems sufficient.

Finally, information from ArabHardware.net suggests a pricing model on three of the first SKUs based on Cypress: HD 5870 2 GB, HD 5870 1 GB, and HD 5850 1 GB. All three use the same GPU and memory standard (GDDR5), but differ in clock speeds and GPU configurations. While HD 5870 sports 1600 stream processors, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, HD 5850 has 1440 stream processors, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Although 32 ROPs puzzles us for a 256-bit wide memory interface, we suspect low-level design changes that make "32 ROPs" more of an effective count than an absolute count. While HD 5870 features over 800 MHz core clock and 5.20 GHz memory, its little sibling has over 700 MHz core clock and 4.40 GHz memory. Price points expected are US $449 for Radeon HD 5870 2 GB, $399 for HD 5870 1 GB, and $299 for HD 5850. AMD is expected to announce all three models on the coming 23rd. You'll be able to find them at your favourite computer store a little later, availability is a certainty by the time you're ready to buy Windows 7. AMD's newest products will be more than ready to squat under X-mas trees all over.
Sources: Czech Gamer, Arab Hardware
Add your own comment

163 Comments on AMD Cypress ''Radeon HD 5870'' Stripped

#76
rpsgc
*sigh* I feared this would happen... the card won't fit inside my case (Antec Solo), it's too long. Maybe the 5850 will maintain a sane size like the current gen.
Posted on Reply
#78
a_ump
Hitman.1stGameHD 5870 X2 will kill GT300 before it launch
lol that's quite a statement. it won't surprise me if the GT300 is 30-50% faster than the GTX 295. The rumored specs are unreal, more than double the GTX 285's as well as supposedly going with a 512-bit GDDR5 memory bus. 512shaders compared to GTX 285's current 240. GT300 is going to be a monster there is no denying it, however if the HD 5870 is even 10% faster than HD 4890's xfire then the HD 5870x2 should still be able to outperform the GT300 by a decent margin. But my last 2 sentences are all speculation and best guess.
Posted on Reply
#79
Unregistered
^
^ but ati is already doubleling it's spec why nvdia can't do the same (with a result of bad yield, power hungry, big die, and hot like hell)
Posted on Edit | Reply
#80
TheMailMan78
Big Member
wahdangun^
^ but ati is already doubleling it's spec why nvdia can't do the same (with a result of bad yield, power hungry, big die, and hot like hell)
My spec has doubled. Damn Burger King. :shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#81
a_ump
wahdangun^
^ but ati is already doubleling it's spec why nvdia can't do the same (with a result of bad yield, power hungry, big die, and hot like hell)
?why can't nvidia do the same, i said they were more than doubling lol. and with a much better memory system than the HD 5XXX series its most definitely going to outperform the HD 5870. They probly are having bad yields which is my suspicion why they can't release till Q1 2010, by then they hope to have enough stock built up and improvements in yields to keep up with supply.
Posted on Reply
#83
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
pantherx12Looks like they're openings to me not solid bits of plastic

www.techpowerup.com/img/09-09-11/132b.jpg

The picture you posted its just a bad angle and the bottom bit of plastic looks as if it is part of the top piece.

They may still be decorative, but they're defitnitely holes.
Yeah, decorative holes that don't participate in the card's internal air-flow.
Posted on Reply
#84
Nick89
I'll be getting one when nvidia rolls out there set of cards, that will lower prices.
Posted on Reply
#85
a_ump
yea....for decorative purposes is the most retarded reason to put those there. i'd rather they were part of the air flow and i don't see how it'd be that difficult to include them into it.
Posted on Reply
#86
TheMailMan78
Big Member
pantherx12Looks like they're openings to me not solid bits of plastic

www.techpowerup.com/img/09-09-11/132b.jpg

The picture you posted its just a bad angle and the bottom bit of plastic looks as if it is part of the top piece.

They may still be decorative, but they're defitnitely holes.
Mussels mouth is a decorative air hole.
Posted on Reply
#87
[I.R.A]_FBi
TheMailMan78Mussels mouth is a decorative air hole.
Lool, the only one?
Posted on Reply
#88
Nick89
TheMailMan78Mussels mouth is a decorative air hole.
:laugh:

Oh man, I laughed my ass off!

Any way looks like I'm going to need to sell my pair of 4870's before nvidia's cards come out.
Posted on Reply
#89
Benetanegia
btarunrMy claim includes 'load'. Again, Max ≠ Load. There's a clear difference between the two which you can look up in our latest reviews. Here's a sample: www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Mushkin/GTX_295_Single_PCB/28.html

Trivia includes: GTX 295's max consumption is 320W, and that of GTX 285 is 218W. So Cypress beats them both at max power.

So this is where Cypress will land (red mark), going by AMD's value of 188W max power:

...
Cards never actually consume what the vendor said it would consume. And ALL of them use TDP, or TDP-like numbers and call them Max power consumption.

Anyway, if history should be taken into account... RV790' slide:



Actual consumption:



So there's no way we could know the actual Maximum consumption, but I think that a good estimate would be around RV790's. But if I'm correct and 188w is the TDP, absolute maximum could be anywhere between 225 and 275 W, depending on how much time they thought the card would be 100% loaded and idling during actual use when they calculated the TDP. TDP can be tricky if the variance between idle and load is huge and in RV870 it seems so. The GTX295 is a good example of how much it can change too.
Posted on Reply
#90
TheMailMan78
Big Member
BenetanegiaCards never actually consume what the vendor said it would consume. And ALL of them use TDP, or TDP-like numbers and call them Max power consumption.

Anyway, if history should be taken into account... RV790' slide:



Actual consumption:



So there's no way we could know the actual Maximum consumption, but I think that a good estimate would be around RV790's. But if I'm correct and 188w is the TDP, absolute maximum could be anywhere between 225 and 275 W, depending on how much time they thought the card would be 100% loaded and idling during actual use when they calculated the TDP. TDP can be tricky if the variance between idle and load is huge and in RV870 it seems so. The GTX295 is a good example of how much it can change too.
Hmmmmm Me thinks you're not new here.
Posted on Reply
#91
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
BenetanegiaCards never actually consume what the vendor said it would consume. And ALL of them use TDP, or TDP-like numbers and call them Max power consumption.

Anyway, if history should be taken into account... RV790' slide:



Actual consumption:



So there's no way we could know the actual Maximum consumption, but I think that a good estimate would be around RV790's. But if I'm correct and 188w is the TDP, absolute maximum could be anywhere between 225 and 275 W, depending on how much time they thought the card would be 100% loaded and idling during actual use when they calculated the TDP. TDP can be tricky if the variance between idle and load is huge and in RV870 it seems so. The GTX295 is a good example of how much it can change too.
Right, so even with that kind of deviation, it will fall between GTX 275 and GTX 285 at worst, or between HD 4870 and GTX 285 at best.
Posted on Reply
#92
pantherx12
btarunrYeah, decorative holes that don't participate in the card's internal air-flow.
That's so rubbish!

I'm so going to find a way to utilise those holes for something!
Posted on Reply
#93
Benetanegia
btarunrRight, so even with that kind of deviation, it will fall between GTX 275 and GTX 285 at worst, or between HD 4870 and GTX 285 at best.
Yeah, yeah. I wasn't pretending it would consume as much as a GTX295. Just wanted to clarify that it wont be right where you put it either. 250W is already goood!!

And, it's true those things are purely decorative? I know I don't like them...
Posted on Reply
#94
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
BenetanegiaYeah, yeah. I wasn't pretending it would consume as much as a GTX295. Just wanted to clarify that it wont be right where you put it either. 250W is already goood!!
I had acknowledged that I'm putting AMD's value in a graph full of TPU's measurements. So the deviation is obvious. What's clear is it's not going to lose to GTX 285 or GTX 295 at max power.
Posted on Reply
#95
Benetanegia
btarunrI had acknowledged that I'm putting AMD's value in a graph full of TPU's measurements. So the deviation is obvious. What's clear is it's not going to lose to GTX 285 or GTX 295 at max power.
Well, I think this conversation is unfair. I've seen all your posts and it's pretty clear you have "insider" info HAha. I'm guessing it won't lose to those cards. But by the numbers that we have, the rest of us, it could reach even 300W, who knows (always speaking about Wizzard's graph). I mean, look at this:

img.donanimhaber.com/resimler/R700_4870-x2-slide.jpg

285 W according to the slide, 381W acording to Wizzards measurements. That's 100 W of difference. In the end it doesn't matter because a card will never reach those levels during actual use, that's just the consumtion it reaches in one odd clock cycle in which all of it's units are working together, and that happens, what, 1 time every complete 3dmark run??
Posted on Reply
#97
Benetanegia
MeizumanBene, Pic No Work
mm works for me. :confused:

Just google HD4870 X2 slide or something... You might even find one with a different number, I don't know. I'm not trying to say "ey guys this is like this!!", just that unless we know something (ahem Btarunr ;)) everything is possible... Or am I missing something else?
Posted on Reply
#98
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Not much insider info, but I talk to luckier people, in this case, people who made Cypress a substitute for their better-half/teddy for a few days. Anyway, mark your calendar/PIM/Blackberry for 23rd.
Posted on Reply
#99
imperialreign
looks like I might ahve to pack some loot away for when the 5870x2s roll out . . . :D
Posted on Reply
#100
Benetanegia
btarunrNot much insider info, but I talk to luckier people, in this case, people who made Cypress a substitute for their better-half/teddy for a few days. Anyway, mark your calendar/PIM/Blackberry for 23rd.
Yep, in other words: Wiz has it, but the watchdog called NDA is watching. he, exactly what I meant.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 23:17 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts