Friday, October 8th 2010
AMD Rebranding HD 5770 and HD 5750 to HD 6700 Series
Earlier today, we were treated to the first picture of the Radeon HD 6870, a new and upcoming performance graphics card from AMD. It was also learned that the HD 6870 is based on a new GPU codenamed "Barts", which is intended to be a successor to the previous-generation "Juniper" GPU, which was at the center of the Radeon HD 5700 desktop and Mobility HD 5800 series. That left some uncertainty as to what GPU was going to drive the sub-$199 HD 6700 series. AMD may have found an answer, rebranding.
AMD seems to have been on the crossroads of which naming scheme to adopt. The first scheme based on conventional logic tells users that Barts-based SKUs should sit in the HD 6700 series, and Cayman-based single-GPU SKUs in the HD 6800; while the second scheme promotes Barts to the HD 6800 series, and Cayman to the HD 6900 series, pushing the low-volume, high-end Antilles (dual-Cayman) graphics card to the HD 6990 SKU. Evidently, AMD chose the newer, second scheme. The only rationale that makes sense is that the x800 series seems to be very popular, and if Barts, with its radically redesigned SIMD components can perform on par or better than the HD 5800 series SKUs, that's enough to justify its upwards push.Since the new performance SKU will be labeled HD 6800 series, that leaves some vacuum with the HD 6700 series. The solution to this came in the form of a perceptually bad practice of rebranding Juniper-based SKUs to HD 6700 series. There is a possibility of AMD stepping up clock speeds, or adding software features to the HD 6700 series, but that's as far as we can see the Juniper going. "Turks" and "Caicos" are new GPUs, that trail behind in the HD 6600, HD 6500, and HD 6400 Series, respectively.
Source:
ATI-Forum.de
AMD seems to have been on the crossroads of which naming scheme to adopt. The first scheme based on conventional logic tells users that Barts-based SKUs should sit in the HD 6700 series, and Cayman-based single-GPU SKUs in the HD 6800; while the second scheme promotes Barts to the HD 6800 series, and Cayman to the HD 6900 series, pushing the low-volume, high-end Antilles (dual-Cayman) graphics card to the HD 6990 SKU. Evidently, AMD chose the newer, second scheme. The only rationale that makes sense is that the x800 series seems to be very popular, and if Barts, with its radically redesigned SIMD components can perform on par or better than the HD 5800 series SKUs, that's enough to justify its upwards push.Since the new performance SKU will be labeled HD 6800 series, that leaves some vacuum with the HD 6700 series. The solution to this came in the form of a perceptually bad practice of rebranding Juniper-based SKUs to HD 6700 series. There is a possibility of AMD stepping up clock speeds, or adding software features to the HD 6700 series, but that's as far as we can see the Juniper going. "Turks" and "Caicos" are new GPUs, that trail behind in the HD 6600, HD 6500, and HD 6400 Series, respectively.
140 Comments on AMD Rebranding HD 5770 and HD 5750 to HD 6700 Series
I don't fucking believe it. :nutkick:
Be interesting to see if Charlie Demerjian (he of the vitriolic anti nvidia rants) tears into AMD the same way.
How many fricken generations did NV rebadge the same cards? 8800>9800>GTS250
I see this is the same technique NV has used, whilst your current gen lineup is on top, incrementally improve the high end cards and rebrand the mid range and bam you have a new gen of cards that hordes will buy A) cause some people will want the best high end cards period (dual or single gpu, doesn't matter) and B) cause some people are too dumb to know the mid range is a just a fricken rebadge :nutkick:
store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey It's teh internet
sillydummy. :Pahh rumors rumors, lets see how it works out.
To rename a 5 series architecture as a 6 series piece without having the associated changes in design, well it's pretty miserable. I thought it was dick when NV did it and it certainly will be if AMD do it too.
But if it has ramped down elements of Barts then it can be called 6 whatever, as it's a changed design. Guess we have to see?
But many posters are right - you should buy your kit based on sound reviews. People that buy tech without doing any basic research shouldn't be buying tech at all. So in the big scheme it's no biggie to me but imo it's a marketting hand job.
That being said, it's no reason to buy green as someone posted - thats even more ignorant. You buy what's best for your system, green red or blue (in 25 yrs when Intel makes a decent gfx unit).
:D
And yeah, kinda odd, isn't it? :laugh:
Antilles
Cayman
Barts
Caicos
Capsian
Turks
Onega
vs
Hemlock
Cypress
Juniper
Redwood
Cedar
Although just a guess if true would indicate more cards to choose from with the 6000 series then with the 5000 series
Basically, I think they would have a tough time selling a 6770 at a 5870 price, even if it really is faster.
I'll have my 5770 for awhile I figure, I might play 2 hours of games a week now.
Here's hoping for some kick ass high end cards.:toast: