This is fine as long as I don't see a $100 jump in price.

if only on the flagship models, this makes sense

if this is included in the price or with only a small bump, i can see people choosing these even if sandy/ivy bridge performs better

So that means it runs too hot for them to be able to cool them via a cheap crap cooler. So instead of losing more money on better coolers, they recognized their target audience likely uses water cooling. So...slap in a cheap water cooler and make everyone happy. Plus you get a sales pitch with that. Highly doubt they'll run too hot to be able to be cooled on air alone.

NC37So that means it runs too hot for them to be able to cool them via a cheap crap cooler. So instead of losing more money on better coolers, they recognized their target audience likely uses water cooling. So...slap in a cheap water cooler and make everyone happy. Plus you get a sales pitch with that. Highly doubt they'll run too hot to be able to be cooled on air alone.

The TDP on the high ends is 150W isn't it?

Were you expecting the stock cooler to work on that?

Also remember AMD's current stock cooler is really bad compared to intel's

I'd totally buy one, and use the water cooler for my HTPC.

cheesy999The TDP on the high ends is 150W isn't it?

Were you expecting the stock cooler to work on that?

Also remember AMD's current stock cooler is really bad compared to intel's

The all aluminum Intel "puck" cooler no. The aluminum and copper "puck" cooler yes. I'm not sure what Intel is using currently. AMD's are thermally different from Intel as well, not sure about Bulldozer though.

That's awesome!

They should manufacture the flagship models with the closed loop water cooling kits and have a second SKU without it for those that don't want to spend extra just for the cooler.

Unlikely to be as good as it sounds

As mentioned on another website this is probably going to be one of those crappy low-cost systems that are already on the market with 1500-2000 rpm fan. They're just trying to hop on the "liquid cooling" gimmick bandwagon ...

Why not bundle new CPUs with high quality air cooler with identical, yet lower rpm fan instead ? Sub-1300 rpm should be doable so less noise at the same cost.

Really great idea but don't want to hear anything about bd or fx execpt AVAILABLE NOW

Not going to happen for the models coming out, it's going to be pretty hard fitting those in those tin boxes

I can see this happening if they are going to sell TWKR models for $1000

cheesy999The TDP on the high ends is 150W isn't it?

125W if we can trust the info we have.

repman244125W if we can trust the info we have.

It's actually below 125W TDP

Turbo Core 2.0 works to 125 TDP

so if you turn off Turbo Core you will never hit the 125W TDP

I wish that they'd just give us the option to buy processors without heatsinks.

I almost thought some naughty admin deleted my post, but then realized that a new thread opened up. :roll:

Anyway, I have mixed feelings about an LCS being included instead of a fan. Not all cases have 120mm fan grilles (mATX build anyone?) and if the thing blows up or leaks, it will be taking out hardware most likely. Anyone remember the Tom's Hardware videos of heatsinks being removed from PIII (370) and Athlon (462) systems while playing the game? The Pentiums always downclocked and saved themselves, while the AMD processors went until they caught on fire and died. I even lost one core of a skt. 939 Athlon X2 due to an improperly installed heatsink, so I hope AMD has some better protective measures nowadays.

HotobuI wish that they'd just give us the option to buy processors without heatsinks.

Then someone might come along and say "My 8310P doesn't need a HSF since it didn't come with one" but who knows. Even if you give someone a HSF, it's not guaranteed that they'll use it, as in the case of some guy buying an i7 975X and using it a week before his new system died, wondering what that burning smell was, and that he maybe should have used the included fan. :shadedshu

It looks like AMD is testing the waters everyplace they can.

Meh, considering coolers like the Antec KUHLER H2O 620, or similar Corsair CWCH60 aren’t enough to provide real strong over-clocking, it’s an expensive gimmick that’s only going to suffice like stock heat-pipe (H-P) coolers not much different than those included with a 965 do today. More often at idle such water coolers are good and quite, though at load the first iterations could provide a ruckus. While todays versions are better there's only so many BTU's that can be effectivly transfered by mean of such 120mm type radiators and reasonable air movement.

What’s interesting is that can AMD even consider this as a cost vs. market value, if their cost is say 30% higher than a current H-P cooler cost them to include. How cheap are Water-cooler to produce?

Me I say stop adding coolers, just make sure it positively will shut-down at a controlled temperature, like they already do. Before damage and say no warranty if you really fry it. No different than it is right now if you’re an idiot and run it without or insufficient cooling how does AMD deal with that. Leave responsibility on user to choose the right cooler for their particular application and just have a list of authorized coolers. We’re all big boys; I rather have the option and not pay more for something I don’t intend to use.

Extra money for a cooler only enough for stock speed and turbo boost and not useful for high overclocking, it will big waste.

Hayder_MasterExtra money for a cooler only enough for stock speed and turbo boost and not useful for high overclocking, it will big waste.

It is all gimmick, if not they would just have an option for an incredible air cooler.

Jstn7477I almost thought some naughty admin deleted my post, but then realized that a new thread opened up. :roll:

Anyway, I have mixed feelings about an LCS being included instead of a fan. Not all cases have 120mm fan grilles (mATX build anyone?) and if the thing blows up or leaks, it will be taking out hardware most likely.

A lot of mATX cases still generally have a single 120mm fan mount at the front, you can just throw the radiator there(unless the rad is to thick).

Closed loop water coolers tends to be much safer then custom water cooling so i wouldn't worry much about something going wrong, then again we really haven't seen AMD's closed loop cooler(assuming they actually go through with it), so it's hard to tell. But from the perspective of seeing Corsairs closed loop water coolers, i wouldn't worry, they're strong.

Hayder_MasterExtra money for a cooler only enough for stock speed and turbo boost and not useful for high overclocking, it will big waste.

well we don't know any performance specs of the water cooler they had in mind, the one pictured is just an example. sounds like a cool idea though (no pun intended)

i'm guessing corsair or asetek

Thats cool to hear but they have some big boots to fill if they plan on taking on Corsair's self contained water solution.

All they'd do is use a proven asetek or coolit with an AMD logo. Wouldn't have anything to do with corsair.

Looks like AMD has found the fastest way to receive negative publicity. Bundle a water cooler with a processor so every joe shmuck can fry their computer and then complain about horrible warranties and faulty tech support.

Bad idea in my opinion... :laugh:

fullinfusionThats cool to hear but they have some big boots to fill if they plan on taking on Corsair's self contained water solution.

Corsair just get someone else to make it, same people as make it for Asus. Likely AMD would go to the same place and get theirs.

Personally I don't like it because those water coolers aren't as good as high end air, or as quiet or as cheap.