Tuesday, March 24th 2015

Intel to Launch Just Two LGA1150 "Broadwell" Parts

In what could be a sign of Intel being stuck with "undigested" Core "Haswell" inventories, BGA chips becoming commonplace for desktop platforms that don't see CPU upgrades, or even "Broadwell" being too short a stopgap between "Haswell" and "Skylake," the company has reportedly decided to launch just two socket LGA1150 Core "Broadwell" parts, when the silicon hits the market towards June.

Built in the 14 nm silicon fab process, "Broadwell" will bring about performance/Watt increments, and Intel doesn't appear to be in the mood to trade those in for higher clock speeds (higher performance out of the box). It's relevant to note here, that the "Broadwell" core is essentially an optical shrink of the "Haswell" CPU architecture to 14 nm, much like "Ivy Bridge" was to "Sandy Bridge," even if the silicon seating the cores itself is much different (meatier iGPU). Intel will be going in with just two parts, both of which are unlocked, for PC enthusiasts to chew on. These include the Core i7-5775C and the Core i5-5675C.
Both the i7-5775C and the i5-5675C are quad-core parts, with TDP rated as low as 65W. The i7-5775C offers clock speeds of 3.30 GHz, with 3.70 GHz Turbo Boost, while the i5-5675C offers 3.10 GHz, with 3.60 GHz Turbo Boost. The i7-5775C comes with just 6 MB of L3 cache, while the i5-5675C offers just 4 MB of it. The i7-5775C offers HyperThreading, letting the OS address eight logical CPUs, while the i5-5675C lacks it. Both chips feature Intel's Iris Pro 6200 series integrated graphics, and feature dual-channel DDR3L-1600 memory support. It will be interesting to see how the two compare to the existing i7-4790K and i5-4690K, although something tells us that they're not comparable. The two will be compatible with existing LGA1150 motherboards, with BIOS updates.
Source: VR-Zone
Add your own comment

53 Comments on Intel to Launch Just Two LGA1150 "Broadwell" Parts

#51
peche
Thermaltake fanboy
TRWOVmmm Intel is making sense for a change. Only thing missing is an unlocked i3.
mmm no, thats not intelligent for intel, with unlocked i3's more people will get then and sales for i5's and i7s will be marginally reduced,
i thinks is not gona happen....
Posted on Reply
#52
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
FordGT90ConceptWhich is my point. DDR3-2133 is the max the DDR3 standard allows; DDR4-3200 is the max the DDR4 standard allows. There are already DDR4-3200 sticks available and the fastest available overclocking memory right now is DDR4-3333 (bound to go higher). DDR4 has DDR3 beat in every way right now except cost.
What intel DDR3 IMC supports 2133 as a standard/native memory clock? There isn't one im pretty sure. Now if we go to AMD, their memory controller for their APUs support up to 2133 natively, but this is an Intel CPU thread.

There is not a single DDR4 IMC that supports higher then 2133 natively (Only choice we have for DDR4 is Haswell E anyways). So anything above that is not really standard. Its still an overclock in respect to what the IMC allows.

By the time DDR4 was even widely available on the consumer market, we had people taking DDR3 DIMMs to 3000mhz+
pechemmm no, thats not intelligent for intel, with unlocked i3's more people will get then and sales for i5's and i7s will be marginally reduced,
i thinks is not gona happen....
Not necessarily, especially if people need the actual cores in the i5/i7s for applications other than gaming. Not to mention, with DX12 on the horizon, multi-threading for games should be better so more cores might actually make a difference in games for once.
Posted on Reply
#53
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
MxPhenom 216What intel DDR3 IMC supports 2133 as a standard/native memory clock? There isn't one im pretty sure. Now if we go to AMD, their memory controller for their APUs support up to 2133 natively, but this is an Intel CPU thread.
JEDEC sets the standards, not Intel/AMD (they are both members of JEDEC though). It was probably raised to DDR3-2133 because AMD requested it and DDR4 was still a ways off.
MxPhenom 216By the time DDR4 was even widely available on the consumer market, we had people taking DDR3 DIMMs to 3000mhz+
As I already pointed out, the fastest memory available on the market today (3333) is DDR4, not DDR3. DDR3 has pretty much reached the extent it can go as well; the same is not true of DDR4.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 29th, 2024 04:58 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts