Wednesday, May 1st 2024
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Now at a Mouth-watering $329
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, the 12-core/24-thread Socket AM5 processor with 3D V-cache, is selling at a new low price of just $329. A retailer-specific discount by AntOnline puts the processor at a price lower than the launch price of the Ryzen 7 7700X, and Core i5-14600K. While we haven't had a chance to test this chip, testing by Tom's Hardware puts its gaming performance higher than the Core i9-13900K, with a multithreaded productivity performance in a similar range. The 7900X3D probably suffers from bad sales due to the popularity of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which remains the fastest gaming processor, and the 7950X3D, which is AMD's flagship processor.
That's not all, prices of even some of the recently launched processors for the older Socket AM4 platform are on a slope, which could attract sales from those that want to upgrade. The Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a slightly slower version of the 5800X3D—the fastest gaming processor for AM4, with a gaming performance rivaling the Core i9-12900K. This new chip can be had at just $229 on Amazon US. The Ryzen 7 5800X was once a solid gaming processor when AMD dominated Intel's 10th- and 11th Gen, it's now going for just $179.
Source:
VideoCardz
That's not all, prices of even some of the recently launched processors for the older Socket AM4 platform are on a slope, which could attract sales from those that want to upgrade. The Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a slightly slower version of the 5800X3D—the fastest gaming processor for AM4, with a gaming performance rivaling the Core i9-12900K. This new chip can be had at just $229 on Amazon US. The Ryzen 7 5800X was once a solid gaming processor when AMD dominated Intel's 10th- and 11th Gen, it's now going for just $179.
104 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Now at a Mouth-watering $329
It kind of wierd step child for gamers, since it bascially acts as a 6-core in games, and in other workloads it is a lower clocked 7900X. On top of that there is the scheduling issue.
It really wasn't attractive at all given it launced at a price higher than the 14700k which has 8 P-cores. And this was before people realized whats going on with Raptor Lake.
I guess 7800x3d still makes more sense for someone like me though, as I just went to have plug n play experience for gaming, and really have no need for the extra cores. that being said, this is an incredible price still
Without it my steam downloads will be stuck at around 600Mbps instead of 1.6Gbps or so because the 4 E-cores are choking while the P-cores are AFK.
The problem is with things like kernel-level anti-cheats that are common in Esports titles these days. And gets destroyed in multi-core performance, even after the baseline profile.
The whole point of getting this over the 7800X3D is for multi-core, and the 7800X3D do not have to deal with scheduling issues.
WTaF AMD. Pretends they are global and only cares about US.
That's one of the things that gets overlooked sometimes about US prices. We pay more than the advertised price. For example the 7900X3D lists on Amazon for $400 but when I include Sales Tax for my area (9.25%) the price I actually pay is $437.
Even with all of that you guys in Australia just seemed to get ripped off on pricing for some reason.
only way to get this price is in-person at Microcenter, and only way to get the $216 price is if you buy all 3 items as a bundle.
I have no fucking idea how Microcenter pulls off these prices. holy shit, this is incredible.
It's obvious that these prices are because of the cartel, and they have no connection with the reality. It's someone's poor decision when they woke up in a crazy mood one morning. :kookoo:
By same logic, RX 7900 XT must cost 499.
FYI, GF 8800 Ultra was 830$ back in May 2007.
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-8800-ultra.c195
Back in 2007, the average salary in my country was the equivalent of 276$, that means one could buy 8800 Ultra with 3.6 average salaries.
Today, the average salary in my country is the equivalent of 1278$, this means one could buy a graphics card at $1291 with only one salary and a bit more.
There are many production areas in which because of process optimisations and using cheaper materials, the costs of the goods end lower than in the past.
Anyway, since the GPUs will be made on the same(-ish) node as the RTX 4000 series, all improvements in terms of performance and efficiency will have to come from the new architecture and there is only so much you can do with that. I would temper expectations and expect a rather moderate +30% over the RTX 4090.
I also wouldn't expect any fancy new features. They have surprised us with some nice innovative stuff like RTX Remix in previous gens but I don't see that happening again as long as all of their top talent is very busy with AI/datacenter. Let's be blunt here. nVidia is going to more or less half-ass the RTX 5000 series because it is not at all their priority at the moment. AI datacenter keeps on exploding exponentially and it is only logical and natural that nVidia have all hands on deck and are leveraging the best production node (3nm) for AI exclusively. Gaming is forced to take a backseat for now.
Finally, I wouldn't ever get the 7900X3D. You get the worst of the X3D CPUs with that model because it is an all around compromise on all fronts. You either get the 7800X3D (gaming focus) or the 7950X3D if you really have a use case for the additional cores (like rendering, content creation or whatever). The 7900X3D is mid garbage. Personally, I do not like the X3D CPUs above the 7800X3D at all because of the requirement to run Xbox Game Bar (ewww) and to activate the abysmal 'Game Mode' in Windows. Those reqs are unacceptable to me.
Besides, if anyone is waiting until later this year then I would definitely wait an additional two or three months and get the 9800X3D which should be introduced at CES in January 2025 and available in/by March or so.