Tuesday, December 8th 2015

EVGA and K|NGP|N Take GeForce GTX 980 Ti GPU to New Heights – 2200MHz

Press Release by
btarunr
 Discuss (17 Comments)
EVGA and Vince "K|NGP|N" Lucido have once again teamed up to achieve three new 3DMark World Records, with Vince running his EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti K|NGP|N Edition graphics card at over 2200MHz GPU clock on liquid nitrogen cooling. The EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti K|NGP|N Edition graphics card has been meticulously designed from the ground up for overclocking, and feats such these new world records are further proof that EVGA products are #1 for overclocking. Vince recently had this to say about the graphics card design:

"K|NGP|N GTX 980 Ti once again represents EVGA's dedication to the enthusiast inspired hardware, bullet proof engineering and bleeding edge performance."
EVGA Hardware Used:
  • EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti K|NGP|N Edition Graphics
  • EVGA X99 Micro2 Motherboard
  • EVGA SuperNOVA Power Supply
3DMark World Records Obtained:
  • 3DMark Fire Strike (Single Card)
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme (Single Card)
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (Single Card)

Related News

Add your own comment

17 Comments on EVGA and K|NGP|N Take GeForce GTX 980 Ti GPU to New Heights – 2200MHz

#1
zithe
But can it run Crysis?

I'm so sorry.
Posted on Reply
#2
RejZoR
It would be more interesting t take the lowest end card and overclock it to extreme, trying to match the highest end card with it in performance. Like GTX 970 trying to get as close as possible to GTX 980Ti. That would be more entertaining.
Posted on Reply
#3
xorbe
RejZoRIt would be more interesting t take the lowest end card and overclock it to extreme, trying to match the highest end card with it in performance. Like GTX 970 trying to get as close as possible to GTX 980Ti. That would be more entertaining.
It doesn't matter how fast the core is ticking if it's bottlenecked by 224-bit vram vs 384.
Posted on Reply
#4
nickbaldwin86
I love how they have a air cooled card in the pictures...

Ok kingpin get 4 off these at 2200Mhz and destroy all the records! hope his lab is next to a power plant
Posted on Reply
#5
RejZoR
xorbeIt doesn't matter how fast the core is ticking if it's bottlenecked by 224-bit vram vs 384.
That's the whole point. How much you can squeeze out of an old clunker. It was so fun overvolting and overclocking a GeForce 8400GS Passive by slaming obnoxiously loud fan to it and just going mad. If you already have a fast card it's just not the same.
Posted on Reply
#6
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
RejZoRThat's the whole point. How much you can squeeze out of an old clunker. It was so fun overvolting and overclocking a GeForce 8400GS Passive by slaming obnoxiously loud fan to it and just going mad. If you already have a fast card it's just not the same.
When you set records you don't do it with something that wont 'win'. It's fun as a hobbyist to squeeze the extra performance out of a chip but these 'world' records are serious business and as such use top grade kit. It's irrelevant to most of us but FWIW, 2.2Ghz on a GPU core is nuts.
Posted on Reply
#7
CrAsHnBuRnXp
I actually get tired of these world records as liquid nitrogen isnt really a 24/7 viable cooling method for anyone practical if at all. Why cant we have wold records with practical cooling? Id be more impressed then.
Posted on Reply
#8
HumanSmoke
CrAsHnBuRnXpI actually get tired of these world records as liquid nitrogen isnt really a 24/7 viable cooling method for anyone practical if at all.
Whoever said extreme overclocking was practical? The sheer expense and effort should have ruled that theory out from the outset - even before the first flask of LN2 was uncapped.
CrAsHnBuRnXpWhy cant we have wold records with practical cooling? Id be more impressed then.
There are plenty of world records for practical cooling -just pick the cooling parameters from the options for whatever relevant benchmark. Frequency tends to deal in absolutes, and is fairly subjective since it is tied to the architecture and how well it clocks in general. Performance benchmarks are generally more applicable which is why they tend to be the validation criteria.
Posted on Reply
#9
xorbe
CrAsHnBuRnXpI actually get tired of these world records as liquid nitrogen isnt really a 24/7 viable cooling method for anyone practical if at all. Why cant we have wold records with practical cooling? Id be more impressed then.
You should email Kingpin, and let him know you think his hobby sucks.
Posted on Reply
#10
Fluffmeister
Hey, at least one GPU this year turned out to be “an overclockers dream”.
Posted on Reply
#11
PP Mguire
the54thvoidWhen you set records you don't do it with something that wont 'win'. It's fun as a hobbyist to squeeze the extra performance out of a chip but these 'world' records are serious business and as such use top grade kit. It's irrelevant to most of us but FWIW, 2.2Ghz on a GPU core is nuts.
You can still pick up old stuff and set world clock records for that piece of kit though. One of the highest CPU clocks is still an old Celery. I had the highest clock on an i5 750 for a little while until somebody put one under LN2. Not all records require a 3DMark score associated with them.
Posted on Reply
#12
Sempron Guy
FluffmeisterHey, at least one GPU this year turned out to be “an overclockers dream”.
The other one is an overclockers dream all right, if it's handled by the one who knows his stuff. Most people nowaday has this false notion that them learning how to press the auto tune button already classifies them under that overclocker populace.
Posted on Reply
#13
Fluffmeister
Sempron GuyThe other one is an overclockers dream all right, if it's handled by the one who knows his stuff. Most people nowaday has this false notion that them learning how to press the auto tune button already classifies them under that overclocker populace.
I stand corrected I guess.
Posted on Reply
#14
Dippyskoodlez
CrAsHnBuRnXpI actually get tired of these world records as liquid nitrogen isnt really a 24/7 viable cooling method for anyone practical if at all. Why cant we have wold records with practical cooling? Id be more impressed then.
You can thank this 'useless hobby' for most, if not all of the innovations that enthusiasts can enjoy on all levels today.
Posted on Reply
#15
Prima.Vera
zitheBut can it run Crysis?

I'm so sorry.
On 4K? I doubt it...
Posted on Reply
#16
The Foldinator
He should try to get his name onto products, you know like that fragility guy.
can they sell it for 10 more o_O

still nice to see some serious BENCH marking :cool:
Posted on Reply
#17
The N
well, 2200mhz is huge overclock. very considerable difference between regular cooling gpu and nitrogrn
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 19th, 2024 08:52 EST change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts