Monday, January 22nd 2007
Low-end Core 2 Duo out
Intel has released its newest addition to the Core 2 Duo family with the new low-end E4300. Running at 1.8GHz, this CPU has a frontside bus speed of 800MHz and a 2MB L2 cache, the first processor in the range without a 1,066MHz FSB. Although Intel hasn't provided any details yet itself, news of this processor was first released in November 2006 when it was leaked on the company roadmaps. Two more low-end Core 2 Duos are expected next quarter, the 1.6GHz E4200 and the 2GHz E4400, both with an 800MHz FSB. These new CPUs are aimed at lower performing systems with a tighter budget in mind - the E4300 should cost around $163.
Source:
Reg Hardware
27 Comments on Low-end Core 2 Duo out
E4300 > X6800
I believe these are going down to either 160 or 140 (ultimately being $20-30 cheaper than the E6300)
£111.26 ($220 US) versus £118.62 ($235 US) for the e6300. Welcome to rip-off Britain :mad:
EDIT: ah, its a misquote from the original source
However, the new chips coming out soon E6320 and E6430 (I believe that is what they are called) are the same chips as E6300 and E6400, but with 4MB of L2 cache.
That sounds pretty good to me, esp. when they are going to be the same price as E6300 and E6400.:rockout:
Just noticed the E4400 will have a muti of 10x (same as the E6700)!
9€ difference to a e6300 non-box :toast:
And then they lowered the fsb just to make a bigger difference from the E6300. But all in all its pretty much a cheaper E6300 with a higher multiplier.
Looks like the celeron 300A all over again:
www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2903&p=2
E4300 is just the slowest of all the actual core 2 duos. That AnandTech review is crud.
E4200 (8x) - 100$ = E6400
E4300 (9x) - 130$ = E6600
E4400 (10x) - 160$ = E6700
So to counter that - so that everyone dosent buy these.. Intel is making the E6350 and E6450 with 4MB CPUs, instead of 2MB.
So now its the E6350 4MB vs. E4x00 2MB.
E4x00 @ 3.3Ghz is better or the same as the X6800, so the answer is clear.
Anandtech review showed high overclockability plus we all read the Intel price drop article on TPU, didn't we?