Monday, July 1st 2019

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Beats Intel Core i9-9900KF at PassMark - CPU Mark Single-Thread

In more evidence of AMD having finally achieved or exceeded IPC parity with Intel, a mid-range Ryzen 5 3600 processor beats Intel's current mainstream-desktop flagship processor, the Core i9-9900KF, at the PassMark - CPU Mark single-thread benchmark. The official performance chart for PassMark shows the Ryzen 5 3600 leading the pack, with 2,981 points, a score which is 1.77 percent higher than that of the Core i9-9900KF on the same chart. It also beats the Core i9-9900K by 2.86 percent. Interestingly, the chart does not mention whether the Ryzen 5 3600 is running at its stock frequency of 3.60 GHz with 4.20 GHz boost, or whether it's overclocked. The i9-9900KF boosts to 5.00 GHz. For a single-threaded benchmark, it's generally assumed that the maximum boost multiplier is engaged on both chips. The score can't be dismissed due to this uncertainty, either, because AMD achieving a 1-2 percent IPC uplift over "Skylake" (fine, "Coffee Lake,") isn't impossible given the leaps the company made in the past three years.
Sources: PassMark, MarkDaKind (Reddit)
Add your own comment

51 Comments on AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Beats Intel Core i9-9900KF at PassMark - CPU Mark Single-Thread

#51
medi01
ToxicTaZIf you want faster than next generation consoles then get 3800X and 5700 XT.
Nobody knows what GPUs will be in the next gen consoles. They could likely opt for 350mm2 EUV chip, which, even at lower clocks, will leave 5700XT and 2080 quite behind.
ToxicTaZ8086K & 9900KS top performance
That statement would make sense, had mentioned CPUs been universally faster (even ignoring that they consume nearly twice as much as competitor).
Most people who utilize CPU heavy-lifting tasks will be much better off with 3900x.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 18th, 2024 10:54 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts