Tuesday, December 3rd 2019

AMD to Unveil Radeon RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 Series in December

AMD is expected to bolster its mid-thru-performance segments of graphics cards with a few new product announcements in December. To begin with, the Radeon RX 5500 XT, which maxes out the 24 RDNA compute units on the "Navi 14" silicon, could see an early-December announcement, possibly ahead of the mid-December release of the RX 5500 to the AIB (add-in board) retail channel. Next up, is the new RX 5600 series, which enables AMD to capture $200-$300 price-points, competing with the likes of the GeForce GTX 1660 Super and GTX 1660 Ti.

There's no word on how what silicon the RX 5600 series is based on, but VideoCardz reports that the series topping RX 5600 XT has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 192-bit wide memory interface. We expect that the RX 5600-series will carved out of the "Navi 10" silicon by disabling many RDNA compute units and narrowing its memory bus. Given that the RX 5500 XT has 1,536 stream processors and the RX 5700 has 2,304, AMD's wiggle room is somewhere between the two, with stream processor counts of 2,048 or 1,920 being plausible for the RX 5600 XT, and 1,792 for the RX 5600, if it exists. Availability of the RX 5600 series is slated for January 2020.
Image Courtesy: PCGamesN
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

37 Comments on AMD to Unveil Radeon RX 5500 XT and RX 5600 Series in December

#26
Casecutter
_FlareIf it gets a 192bit interface, it´s most likely a cut down Navi10 with one whole Array deactivated, leading to 3x5 WGP = 2048 Cores
If overclocked it will most likely beat a Vega56 with about 150W total boardpower.
Thanks for holding to the Topic! It's what I figured the way they'd get these chips... A hopp-up Navi 14 to get a 5500 XT while a gelded variant of Navi 10, but if that gives them the perf/watts/price this can sustain them till RDNA2 (re-spins) fulfill a more full stack of offerings.
Posted on Reply
#27
Minus Infinity
medi015700 is 300 dollar, ffs.
I know, but people want everything to be dirt cheap these days, champagne for beer prices.
djisas370+€ for the shittiest ones here, not cheap...
A good 5700 is 400€+
ASUS 1660ti's go for 350€ ffs
Well that's because Europe sucks and taxes the living beejeezuz out of you. Some of those VAT's are over 25% ffs. That's not AMD's fault.
Posted on Reply
#28
Jism
yakkDidn't expect 6GB from AMD... :confused:

Guess Navi yields dictated it, but still disappointing.
The 6GB explains the 192 bit memory bus. Having 8 chips would proberly do 256bits.

Since its on GDDR6 even 192bit offers plenty of bandwidth.
Posted on Reply
#29
Baum
Minus InfinityI know, but people want everything to be dirt cheap these days, champagne for beer prices.



Well that's because Europe sucks and taxes the living beejeezuz out of you. Some of those VAT's are over 25% ffs. That's not AMD's fault.
yetthey do what mcdonalds does and adjust the price to the average income somewhat.. only where people are more drawn to their products they keep the price higher on average...
300€+ for a gpu is not mainstream any more...

I feel like 250-275-280€ is maximum for higher midrange gaming that the majority of people use for 3-4years to come
Posted on Reply
#30
djisas
Baumyetthey do what mcdonalds does and adjust the price to the average income somewhat.. only where people are more drawn to their products they keep the price higher on average...
300€+ for a gpu is not mainstream any more...

I feel like 250-275-280€ is maximum for higher midrange gaming that the majority of people use for 3-4years to come
Well, on the adjusting topic, minimum salary here is under 600, need to months to buy fast graphics, prices on Europe are the same, either you earn 3k or 600€...

Now on the topic, if 5500xt goes for 200 and is faster than 1650s, it's a good deal...
Posted on Reply
#31
R0H1T
5700xt is way faster than 1650(super) and won't be selling for $200 anytime soon.
Posted on Reply
#32
djisas
R0H1T5700xt is way faster than 1650(super) and won't be selling for $200 anytime soon.
5500xt, my bad...
Posted on Reply
#33
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
yakkDidn't expect 6GB from AMD... :confused:

Guess Navi yields dictated it, but still disappointing.
Think HD 7970 and R9 280X.
Posted on Reply
#35
Unregistered
eidairaman1Think HD 7970 and R9 280X.
Ok, just slightly cut down, guess they couldn't save the 8gb.

I've got 2 older rigs still using still using a 7970 & the other 2x 280X crossfire. These cards still work amazingly well today in 1080.
#36
Casecutter
As to a 5600 SKU's... If I made a wild guess there's still a Navi 10 that can be gelded below a RX 5700 while still a 256 Bit Bus and Shaders between 2048-2304, while maybe further cuts in TMU's and ROP counts and lower TDP to get on one 8-Pin. A card that goes against the RTX 2060

While as member "_Flare" above points to a final "use-up" with a whole Array deactivated, making a 192-Bit 6Gb, while available for like a $220 price point but works like a Vega 56.

It hark en's back to "Big Chips" like (Tahti or GK 104) that where used in cards like the HD 7870 XT or GTX 660 Ti.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 29th, 2025 16:02 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts