jesso2kThe rule used to be if they don't tell you the panel type then it isn't IPS. Now if they don't tell you then it's definitely not OLED.

BoboOOZThe question is, dimming zones? How many?

Chrispy_Ugh, it's a pair of 24" 1440p displays without a center bezel. That's just too small (vertically) for something that's so large on a desk.

It's also definitely VA because IPS technology hasn't reached R1000 curvature or 2500:1 static contrast (not even close on either count) and unless they're using Samsung's panel and licensing their firmware secret-sauce, 240Hz VA is currently a big fat lie. IIRC the best VA on the market that can deliver anything approaching a reasonable 80%+ refresh compliance outside of the Odyssey G7/G7 Neo is 165Hz.


If they don't boast about a FALD, then probably 16 vertical zones as that costs them almost nothing to achieve and meets the laughably low requirements for DisplayHDR1000, resulting in "technically supporting HDR" but not in a way you'd ever want to use.

TheLostSwede

Chrispy_Ugh, it's a pair of 24" 1440p displays without a center bezel. That's just too small (vertically) for something that's so large on a desk.

LeshyEDIT:
i wonder why everyone uses min 2x24 if its too small vertically :D

i have 34'' 1440p and i would swap for bigger


if you want big, you can go for tv. for monitor its impractical to use taller display

Chrispy_Any idea whose panel they're using? LG.Display don't make any VA monitor panels and only Samsung have successfully reached 240Hz.

blu3dragon2500:1 static contrast-ratio. That has to mean VA, so you are correct on both counts :)

BoboOOZEveryone uses 2*24 because it's cheaper, for some reason. 34 and 38 in 21/9 do exist, it's just that they are more expensive usually.

But 49 are actually 2 27" screens, not 2 24s. While a 34 is just a wider aspect 27.

Leshyill tell you why, because bigger screen is harder to manufacture and is less likely to come out of fab without defects :)

Leshybtw: it wasnt my math, i was just reacting .. so