Thursday, August 24th 2023

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT Reference Design Pictured

AMD, in a now-deleted tweet, revealed what it is probably going to announce later today—the Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT desktop graphics cards. The company briefly tweeted the marketing flier for these cards, before deleting it, but not before VideoCardz saved a copy. This flier confirms the SKU names RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT up for launch; and gives us two images of the Made by AMD (reference design) graphics card. It appears like AMD is using a common board design for both SKUs.

The reference Radeon RX 7800 XT appears to be a slightly shrunk down version of the RX 7900 XT reference. The dual-slot card comes with two axial-flow fans instead of three on the RX 7900 XT. The card draws power from two 8-pin PCIe power connectors. Earlier this month, a leak by PowerColor spilled the beans on the RX 7800 XT being based on the "Navi 32" silicon. A chiplet-based GPU just like the "Navi 31" powering the RX 7900 series; the Navi 32 is maxed out by the RX 7800 XT, and packs 3,840 stream processors, 120 AI accelerators, 60 Ray accelerators, 64 MB of Infinity Cache memory, and a 256-bit GDDR6 memory interface, which holds 16 GB of memory on the RX 7800 XT. Specs of the RX 7700 XT remain under the wraps.
Sources: VideoCardz, AMD Radeon (Twitter)
Add your own comment

64 Comments on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT Reference Design Pictured

#51
Assimilator
Tek-CheckIt's just estimation in data base. Nothing to lose your head over until professional reviews are out.
That one will lose its head over the wildest, most unsubstantiated nonsense. Then it'll tell everyone else that said nonsense is facts. This is why I hate people.
Posted on Reply
#52
Space Lynx
Astronaut
TheinsanegamerNHmmm.....


HMMMMMMMMMM




Now, I'm not saying you're a liar, but.......
not sure what to tell you, ultra settings vsync on, i get 165 fps almost the entire time at 1440p in valhalla. maybe my x3d cache is boosting it, not sure.
Posted on Reply
#53
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
Vya DomusIt ran at like 80-82C stock, when overclocked it would hit 100C. Hot spot temperatures increase disproportionally with power consumption it seems, on water at stock it runs at about 60-65C but then once overclocked it shoots up to 70-75C even though the edge temperature stays almost the same.


This goes to a page not found for me, I guess it's location dependent.
That's so weird then. My current MBA 7900XTX (stock HSF) idles at 45C and 54C hotspot. When on load (Apex Legends, 300Hz, FreeSync disabled) it can go up to 75C & 86C hotspot in a heavy fight. I never expected the MBA 7900 XT to have this problem since it was not an issue compared to the XTX.

Here is what it looks like if you're not able to get the page to load:

Posted on Reply
#54
Nordic
AusWolfI'm wondering if this cooler design is gonna be enough considering that the reference 6750 XT has three fans that are already barely adequate.
MawkzinI disagree, I have the MSI 6750XT MECH 2X with just 2 fans and it's okay under full load.
I can confirm this as well. My MSI 6750XT Mech 2x is not very loud and doesn't go over 70c at full load. Some TPU'ers warned me not to get it because it was the low end cooler model. My experience has been great. I've wondered what temps I would get if I re-pasted.
Posted on Reply
#55
ARF
AusWolfMore claims? Is it really so hard to wait for some hard facts before making a judgement?
It's safe to speculate that the performance of the two will be more or less very close, so one will cancel the existence of the other.
You will see.
Posted on Reply
#56
AusWolf
ARFIt's safe to speculate that the performance of the two will be more or less very close, so one will cancel the existence of the other.
You will see.
Maybe I will see. So what? All I'm saying is, be wise and wait for reviews before passing a judgement.
Posted on Reply
#57
ARF
AusWolfMaybe I will see. So what? All I'm saying is, be wise and wait for reviews before passing a judgement.
All I'm saying is that you don't need to see the reviews. Everything is clear today.
Posted on Reply
#58
AusWolf
ARFAll I'm saying is that you don't need to see the reviews. Everything is clear today.
No, it's not. You can estimate, but you can't know for sure. If you prefer to sink the ship before it has left the port, then be my guest. I'll wait for the reviews.
Posted on Reply
#59
HD64G
7800XT and 7700XT will be separated by at least 15% performance wise. Even the slides with internal testing show close to 20% difference. The pricing as weird as it seems, might have more to do with yields being more than good and AMD wanting to drive more people to the full-die iteration of N32. And maybe another reason would be the stock of 6700XT being still enough and after it dries out the price will fall close to $400.
Posted on Reply
#62
ARF
To the moderators: why is the crazy troll above ^^^^ still lurking around and allowed to post all kind of nonsense and hate speech?
Posted on Reply
#63
Assimilator
ARFTo the moderators: why is the crazy troll above ^^^^ still lurking around and allowed to post all kind of nonsense and hate speech?
No.

You are the one posting lies as facts.
You are the one being fundamentally dishonest.
You are the one spreading FUD about GPU performance, then accusing people of disagreeing with your made-up BS of being "trolls".
You are the troll.
Posted on Reply
#64
ARF
The asshole says that I'm "dishonest" and I'm lying. Where are the lies and what am I "dishonest" about?
Ridiculous crazy troll is that assimilator asshole
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 17th, 2024 23:35 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts