Tuesday, November 7th 2023

AGON by AOC Unveils U27G3X and U32G3X 4K Ultra HD Gaming Monitors

AGON by AOC - one of the world's leading gaming monitor and IT accessories brands - is delighted to introduce two innovative monitors designed to enhance the everyday gaming experience. The AOC GAMING U27G3X/BK and U32G3X/BK offer all the comfort and technology required to enjoy high-quality visuals and versatile performance for a wide range of gaming adventures.

Both of these models feature an IPS panel with UHD (3840x2160) resolution to achieve an impressive sharpness and clarity. With the new AI-powered GPU technologies, achieving high framerates on 4K resolution is becoming much easier than ever. The 4K models U27G3X/BK and U32G2X/BK come to the market at a perfect time for gamers looking for extra sharpness matched with high refresh rates.
The 27" (68.6 cm) U27G3X/BK features a higher 160 Hz refresh rate, whereas the 31.5" (80 cm) U32G3X/BK enhances the gaming experience with a larger display while maintaining a 144 Hz refresh rate. With a fast response time of up to 1 ms GtG, both monitors are an excellent choice for competitive gaming. Equipped with two HDMI 2.1 and two DisplayPorts, both models are highly versatile with connectors to the latest generation of GPUs and consoles. To guarantee comfortable and enjoyable gaming, both models feature ergonomic stands allowing height, tilt, swivel and pivot adjustment.

U27G3X/BK: Outstanding performance for everyday gaming
With its UHD (3840x2160) resolution the U27G3X/BK offers an exceptional viewing experience next to supporting HDR10, certified with VESA DisplayHDR 400. Its IPS panel ensures accurate and vibrant colours for work and play, while the very high pixel density of 163 ppi ensures impressive clarity and sharpness. With a fast 160 Hz refresh rate, it guarantees a smooth and responsive screen, making it perfect for a wide range of games.

Thanks to a rapid response time of up to 1 ms GtG using pixel overdrive or Motion Blur Reduction (MBR) features, the U27G3X/BK delivers crisp and blur-free visuals. Nvidia G-SYNC compatibility and Adaptive-Sync support guarantee, a tear-free gaming experience. With a remarkable 96% DCI-P3 colour coverage (CIE 1976), it delivers vibrant and lifelike visuals, perfectly suited to the immersive world of gaming as well as content creation. Fully compatible with new-generation consoles, the U27G3X/BK supports 4K UHD at 120 Hz, making it a versatile choice. Low input lag, AOC G-Menu integration, Flicker-Free, Low Blue Mode, and Shadow Control further enhance the user experience. U27G3X/BK is scheduled for release starting from mid-November.

U32G3X/BK: An expansive visual adventure
The U32G3X/BK takes visual performance up a notch with its expansive 31.5" screen and UHD resolution. With a 144 Hz refresh rate and its high 140 ppi pixel density, this IPS panel delivers sharp and responsive visuals for a variety of applications. Similar to its 27" sibling, this monitor offers a 95% DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage according to CIE1976 standards and ensures rich and accurate colours with support for an extensive palette of 1.07 billion colours with 10-bit colour depth.

With a fast response time of up to 1 ms GtG using pixel overdrive modes, U32G3X/BK is designed for smooth and responsive gaming performance. Its NVIDIA G-SYNC compatibility and Adaptive-Sync support ensure a seamless and tear-free experience. U32G3X/BK is fully compatible with new-generation consoles and supports 4K UHD at 120 Hz, making it a versatile choice for many different tasks. Low input lag, AOC G-Menu integration, Flicker-Free, Low Blue Mode, and Shadow Control ensure a comfortable and immersive experience. U32G3X/BK is expected to be available in stores from mid-December.

Pricing and availability
U27G3X/BK and U32G3X/BK are set to redefine the 4K gaming experience with their impressive specifications. U27G3X/BK will be available from mid-November 2023, at an MSRP of £499.99.

The larger screen option, U32G3X/BK, is expected to be available in stores from mid-December, at an MSRP of £649.99, giving gamers something to look forward to this holiday season.
Add your own comment

12 Comments on AGON by AOC Unveils U27G3X and U32G3X 4K Ultra HD Gaming Monitors

#1
theouto
I am appalled that they managed to shoehorn AI into the press release, some way somehow. This gold rush has got to end at one point
Posted on Reply
#2
Pastrav
theoutoI am appalled that they managed to shoehorn AI into the press release, some way somehow. This gold rush has got to end at one point
Well the DLSS/FSR/whatnot has objectively enabled people to run at higher framerates than before, thus a drive for higher FPS monitors. A few years ago you sometimes heard that it's not worth buying a high refresh 4k monitor for gaming as the GPU's don't have the oomph - well now they sort of have in a contrived way.
They don't say they have anything AI-related in their product.
Posted on Reply
#3
theouto
PastravWell the DLSS/FSR/whatnot has objectively enabled people to run at higher framerates than before, thus a drive for higher FPS monitors. A few years ago you sometimes heard that it's not worth buying a high refresh 4k monitor for gaming as the GPU's don't have the oomph - well now they sort of have in a contrived way.
They don't say they have anything AI-related in their product.
Probably a knee jerk reaction from me tbh, not dismissing DLSS or FSR, I just thought that mentioning AI for a monitor, specially when it's not even something that your product offers, it just sent me the wrong way. Doesn't help that lately we've been inundated with everything being called "AI" when it's just an algorithm or something of the sort (though we were graced by Oral-b's "AI" toothbrush) (no, really, check this shit www.oralb.co.uk/en-gb/product-collections/genius-x)
Posted on Reply
#4
Octavean
theoutoProbably a knee jerk reaction from me tbh, not dismissing DLSS or FSR, I just thought that mentioning AI for a monitor, specially when it's not even something that your product offers, it just sent me the wrong way. Doesn't help that lately we've been inundated with everything being called "AI" when it's just an algorithm or something of the sort (though we were graced by Oral-b's "AI" toothbrush) (no, really, check this shit www.oralb.co.uk/en-gb/product-collections/genius-x)
Well,…..the artwork looked AI rendered,….. so there is that,…. :)
Posted on Reply
#5
noel_fs
IPS at 750eur nice joke no thank you
Posted on Reply
#7
Minus Infinity
Double-ClickAnother meh IPS 4K panel with useless HDR 400...

Time for the VESA board to deregister HDR400 as being a standard. HDR600 should be the bare minimum to get a tick and at this price point we should be getting HDR1000.
Posted on Reply
#8
INSTG8R
Vanguard Beta Tester
Minus InfinityTime for the VESA board to deregister HDR400 as being a standard. HDR600 should be the bare minimum to get a tick and at this price point we should be getting HDR1000.
I use the VESA certified HDR 400 on my QD-OLED because I know it's accurate I just need to properly calibrate my games. Do I wish it had HDR 600? For sure because the HDR 1000 setting I have found to be less than pleasant and from other users on Win11 that actually reports the nits(not sure how accurately) It's not quite 1000nits...I love HDR and have been on the bandwagon since it was a thing with some decent and not so decent REAL HDR monitors. They have all had caveats UNTIL I got the OLED. Now I zero compromises HDR that works as it should, consisently.
Posted on Reply
#9
theouto
INSTG8RI use the VESA certified HDR 400 on my QD-OLED because I know it's accurate I just need to properly calibrate my games. Do I wish it had HDR 600? For sure because the HDR 1000 setting I have found to be less than pleasant and from other users on Win11 that actually reports the nits(not sure how accurately) It's not quite 1000nits...I love HDR and have been on the bandwagon since it was a thing with some decent and not so decent REAL HDR monitors. They have all had caveats UNTIL I got the OLED. Now I zero compromises HDR that works as it should, consisently.
HDR400 on an OLED and HDR400 on an IPS are wholly different things, because while OLEDS are self illuminating, IPS panels only have a contrast ratio of 1000:1, so whatever HDR there is, it's not actually a high dynamic range, it's just a bright screen. (Maybe I misinterpreted what you said, very possible)

It's why most everyone dismisses HDR400
Posted on Reply
#10
Pastrav
theoutoProbably a knee jerk reaction from me tbh, not dismissing DLSS or FSR, I just thought that mentioning AI for a monitor, specially when it's not even something that your product offers, it just sent me the wrong way. Doesn't help that lately we've been inundated with everything being called "AI" when it's just an algorithm or something of the sort (though we were graced by Oral-b's "AI" toothbrush) (no, really, check this shit www.oralb.co.uk/en-gb/product-collections/genius-x)
yeah, they probably missed the blockchain hype train from yesteryear but definitely got onboard this one. If they're quick enough they should be able to release a quantum computing toothbrush soon too :)
Posted on Reply
#11
trsttte
INSTG8RI use the VESA certified HDR 400 on my QD-OLED because I know it's accurate I just need to properly calibrate my games. Do I wish it had HDR 600? For sure because the HDR 1000 setting I have found to be less than pleasant and from other users on Win11 that actually reports the nits(not sure how accurately) It's not quite 1000nits...I love HDR and have been on the bandwagon since it was a thing with some decent and not so decent REAL HDR monitors. They have all had caveats UNTIL I got the OLED. Now I zero compromises HDR that works as it should, consisently.
You're not using HDR400, you're using HRD400 True Black which is a very different standard and a valuable one to pursue. Other than having a lower peak luminance than HDR1000 it is much better in every way.
Posted on Reply
#12
Scrizz
INSTG8RI use the VESA certified HDR 400 on my QD-OLED because I know it's accurate I just need to properly calibrate my games. Do I wish it had HDR 600? For sure because the HDR 1000 setting I have found to be less than pleasant and from other users on Win11 that actually reports the nits(not sure how accurately) It's not quite 1000nits...I love HDR and have been on the bandwagon since it was a thing with some decent and not so decent REAL HDR monitors. They have all had caveats UNTIL I got the OLED. Now I zero compromises HDR that works as it should, consisently.
Is it DisplayHDR 400 or DisplayHDR True Black 400?
They are not the same thing. DisplayHDR True Black is vastly superior to DisplayHDR regular.


source: displayhdr.org/
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 10:05 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts