Friday, February 9th 2024
ASRock Dives Into Why it Lacks NVIDIA GeForce Graphics Cards; Doesn't Rule Out Making Them in the Future
ASRock, ODM giant Pegatron's retail channel brand, built its reputation over its high cost/performance motherboards, and got into graphics cards rather recently (less than 5 years ago), beginning with AMD Radeon graphics cards, before expanding into Intel Arc GPUs. The company has shown with its high-end AMD Radeon cards that it can design complex custom-design graphics cards with heavy cooling solutions, especially given that AMD Radeon boards tend to have more elaborate power designs than NVIDIA. So then, where are the ASRock GeForce RTX graphics cards? Korean tech publication QuasarZone set to find out from ASRock.
Put simply, ASRock does not rule out making custom design GeForce RTX graphics cards in the future, but says that getting into that market right now, is "challenging." NVIDIA now commands the vast majority of discrete GPU market, and as such most of the top DIY PC retail channel brands (such as ASUS, MSI, GIGABYTE), sell both GeForce and Radeon products. They started making GeForce graphics cards decades ago, and have built market presence over the years. NVIDIA also has a set of board partners that exclusively sell GeForce—such as PNY, Palit-Gainward, Galax-KFA2, and Colorful, which make it all the more tough for ASRock to break in. On the specific question asked by Quasar Zone, here was ASRock's answer (machine translated to English by VideoCardz).
Sources:
VideoCardz, QuasarZone
Put simply, ASRock does not rule out making custom design GeForce RTX graphics cards in the future, but says that getting into that market right now, is "challenging." NVIDIA now commands the vast majority of discrete GPU market, and as such most of the top DIY PC retail channel brands (such as ASUS, MSI, GIGABYTE), sell both GeForce and Radeon products. They started making GeForce graphics cards decades ago, and have built market presence over the years. NVIDIA also has a set of board partners that exclusively sell GeForce—such as PNY, Palit-Gainward, Galax-KFA2, and Colorful, which make it all the more tough for ASRock to break in. On the specific question asked by Quasar Zone, here was ASRock's answer (machine translated to English by VideoCardz).
What are your plans for the future product lineup? Are there any plans to include NVIDIA graphics cards?
ASRock: This is quite a challenging question. Companies that have both NVIDIA and AMD are ASUS, GIGABYTE, and MSI. These brands have been in operation for a longer time than us, and back when there were founded, there were not only ATI and NVIDIA, but also Elsa and Voodoo. No one had a monopolistic position at the time. However, as time passed, NVIDIA's market dominance became overwhelming, and a world where the production of NVIDIA VGA became influential emerged. I believe there are complex reasons for this. From the perspective of ASRock, currently producing AMD and Intel VGA, it seems challenging for us to immediately start manufacturing NVIDIA VGA.
37 Comments on ASRock Dives Into Why it Lacks NVIDIA GeForce Graphics Cards; Doesn't Rule Out Making Them in the Future
I mean, it is just accepted as truth. I am not going to dig through a couple year's worth of data to link you supporting evidence.
What part do you not believe? Let's start there.
Fact 1: AIBs have to buy the core and memory from NVIDIA. NVIDIA gets the margin on the core and the bulk pricing margin on the memory which it doesn't pass onto the AIB. NVIDIA will not sell the core without the memory, so the AIB has no way to leverage bulk pricing on memory for itself.
Fact 2: NVIDIA sets the MSRP of its competing FE products which NVIDIA gets the full margin on.
Fact 3: AIBs get almost no margin on jellybean components because jellybean components are cheap to start with and have little value potential on their own. The final product is what has value, not the individual components; but when competing with NVIDIA, with NVIDIA already getting the majority margin on the most important and valued components, there is little margin left for the AIB.
Tell me where you start to come to a different conclusion.
We have had 2 years for any media outlet to refute the reports which came from multiple sources. If you wait 2 years and then ask for sources, what do you expect? Who keeps lists of links? You can search as good as I can. Catch up. There is no refuting evidence and no evidence that anything has improved for AIBs since this news hit.
I mean, I hardly trust half of JPR's numbers too. They seem to have some really flawed definitions and classifications some times. But when no media refutes this specific claim, multiple AIBs corroborate this estimate, and all available data says that this claim is logical sound, what do you have left to question?
So I ask you:
post one?
I don't strongly doubt the claims but I personally don't have knowledge and was asking for a source. That's all.
PS: It was actually kapone who would be the first "claimant" in this quote line though, not you, just FYI.
@ AsRock/Pegatron
So what do you say folks? Want to step up and fill the place EVGA had? We could use your unique style and good quality in the NVidia GPU sector.
All but 4060 Ti are sold out on Nvidia store page.
FWIW, I did google it myself. What I can find is gross profit margins for the company as a whole, which is different than what we are talking about no?