Wednesday, June 12th 2024

Asetek Stock Tanks 40% as Company Suspends Profitability and Revenue Guidance for 2024

Liquid cooling solutions OEM Asetek saw its stock price drop by over 40% on Wednesday (12th June 2024), as investors responded to the company's announcement of suspending its profitability and revenue guidance for 2024. The release offered an explanation behind this decision. "Based on these new forecasts, the expected increase in demand in the second half of 2024 of the company's liquid cooling products may not materialize. This will result in a significant decline in Group revenue and profitability for 2024 compared to the revenue and profitability guidance issued on March 8, 2024."

The company also stated that it expects the negative trend in the company's revenue may continue into 2025. "The management team and board of directors of Asetek will consider the long- and short-term consequences of the weakened and uncertain market situation. The assessment today is that the negative trend in revenue may continue into 2025. Based on this, a plan containing initiatives to navigate the short and long-term challenges will be developed and then communicated as soon as possible," it said. Asetek is a pioneer in the all-in-one, closed-loop liquid CPU cooler that's popular in the gaming PC segment, but the company should also be in a position to lead the server CPU cooling market given the upward trend in processor cooling needs; but the company is underperforming. This is probably also due to intense competition in the space.
Source: Asetek
Add your own comment

30 Comments on Asetek Stock Tanks 40% as Company Suspends Profitability and Revenue Guidance for 2024

#26
TheLostSwede
News Editor
TotallySwede, you sure picked an odd hill to die on. Got sniped twice before I even showed up.
Look, I have no feelings for Asetek, but they're not a patent troll.
Are they using a flawed system to their advantage and then some, yes.
Posted on Reply
#27
Caring1
I have to agree they are not patent trolls as patent trolls are companies that buy patents and do not manufacture the product, they rely on income from the patents and often sue to ensure said income.
Posted on Reply
#28
thestryker6
Chrispy_It's been invalid outside of the US since 2017, I believe. 7 years of competition out-designing Asetek's stagnant, 20-year old premise has caught up to them.
Yup, and that's why I mentioned it needing to be invalidated since it never was contested in the US to my knowledge. I was really surprised that nobody went the route of having the patent invalidated in the US after that ruling, but I believe everyone they sued in the US after that proved that they weren't infringing.
Posted on Reply
#29
Chrispy_
TotallySwede, you sure picked an odd hill to die on. Got sniped twice before I even showed up.
I think the argument here has just come from different understandings of the term "patent troll". Swede is sticking to the dictionary definition of patent troll, ie a "company who doesn't produce anything, merely collects licensing fees from others". Technically, he's correct - but by that rather limited measure, isn't ARM also patent troll? All they do is license their IP! /s

I'm happy to use the more loose, and perhaps more obvious interpretation of the term; Asetek trolled everyone else by filing a frivolous patent and then abusing the patent system as litigiously as possible in as many regions as possible.

Either way, I think we're all in agreement that Asetek were not the good guys in any way.
Posted on Reply
#30
lexluthermiester
Chrispy_I'm happy to use the more loose, and perhaps more obvious interpretation of the term; Asetek trolled everyone else by filing a frivolous patent and then abusing the patent system as litigiously as possible in as many regions as possible.
Yes, exactly.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 4th, 2024 03:47 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts