Tuesday, July 31st 2007

Printers Could Pose a Similar Risk to Smoking

Research studying 62 different laser printers has shown that 17 out of 62 models tested could be classified as "high particle emitters" due to large quantities of ultrafine particles being released by the machines. The particles, believed to be toner, can potentially be inhaled deep into the lungs, unless the room is well ventilated, where scientists say they could pose a "significant health threat". Most worryingly was that the researchers found that "one of the printers released particles into an experimental chamber at a rate comparable to the particle emissions from cigarette smoking." Of the remaining models, 37 released no particles that diminished air quality, six released only low levels and two released medium levels. The study also found that particle levels in the office increased fivefold during working hours due to printer use, and the printers in question emitted more particles with a new toner cartridge or when printing graphics and imaged that needed more toner. The group is now calling for government officials to consider regulations regarding laser printer emissions.
Source: vunet.com
Add your own comment

33 Comments on Printers Could Pose a Similar Risk to Smoking

#26
lemonadesoda
Oh dear. Some BIG US firm is about to sue some SMALL scientist for defamation.
Posted on Reply
#27
Chewy
Screw HP, Cannon full the way/for the win! I just bought a Cannon ofc :P

Well hopefully the scientist was wrong but I doubt it.. hp will hire thier own scientist who says thier printers are ok... lol
Posted on Reply
#28
HellasVagabond
Actually i tend to believe HP more since they do have more scientists working with them. Besides if it were true everyone could sue HP so......
Posted on Reply
#29
anticlutch
All the more reason to stay away from HP printers... good thing I have a Samsung color laserprinter at home :P
Posted on Reply
#30
Chewy
ah the scientist did pick on/out hp I forgot.
Posted on Reply
#31
surfsk8snow.jah
pshh, Propaganda! Seriously, come on, you don't expect that HP, such a hugely grossing company the world over, isn't going to actively counter something so heavy and serious as this with ALL their might and action? Agreed with Chewy that HP will of course hire their own "independent" scientist/analyst, who will undoubtedly claim that the findings of this University are False in their entirety... Propagandistic BUREAUCRACY!:banghead:

Note This Highly Political, Bureaucratic Piece of the Response:
While we recognize ultrafine, fine, and coarse particles are emitted from printing systems, these levels are consistently below recognized occupational exposure limits.
MUTHA WHAT COARSE PARTICLES?!:wtf:

This is their legal way of making sure they admitted to the reality of the findings, however, AT CURRENT RECOGNIZED LIMITS, under existing regulation which doesn't have much on this, they are fine. Well, that's what a University is for, challenging currently recognized standards without commercial ramifications. I will be eXTREMELY disheartened if this scientist has any recourse for this, because he noted mANY other brands besides HP also. Granted, he may have over exaggerated, I don't know his technique nor the science behind his study, but, I doubt he would've just made this stuff up on the fly.

EVEN STILL, as long as he was precise & consistent, no matter his methodology, this still means that those printers have the highest emissions in comparison with others on the market.:ohwell:
Posted on Reply
#32
russianboy
bullshit, dust is flowing around the air, and so is skin stuff. Cause humans get a "new" epidermis every 4 weeks, and all the old epidermis ends up in the air, and settles to the ground..creepy.
Posted on Reply
#33
surfsk8snow.jah
incongruent analogy. You should go breathe yourself in some Portland Cement then, lol.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Aug 11th, 2024 10:19 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts