Saturday, May 31st 2008

University of Antwerp Makes 4k € Supercomputer with Four GeForce 9800 GX2 Cards

Have you ever thought that gaming parts like NVIDIA's GeForce 9800 GTX video cards for instance, can be used for building a supercomputer. Maybe no, but researchers at the University of Antwerp in Belgium have proven that it's possible to build one. Using four NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 graphics cards, AMD Phenom 9850 processor, 4x2GB Corsair Twinx DDR2 PC6400 memory and MSI K9A2 Platinum motherboard, FASTRA costs less than 4000EUR to build and thanks to NVIDIA's CUDA technology and delivers roughly the same performance as a supercomputer cluster consisting of hundreds of PCs. This new system is used by the ASTRA research group, part of the Vision Lab of the University of Antwerp, to develop new computational methods for tomography. Tomography is a technique used in medical scanners to create three-dimensional images of the internal organs of patients, based on a large number of X-ray photos that are acquired over a range of angles. ASTRA develops new reconstruction techniques that lead to better reconstruction quality than classical methods. You can read more about the FASTRA GPU SuperPC project over here.
Source: DVHardware
Add your own comment

83 Comments on University of Antwerp Makes 4k € Supercomputer with Four GeForce 9800 GX2 Cards

#51
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
They do need to cnvert this setup to water cooler. Maybe they can do what that village in Europe did with their water cooling setup for their IBM super-computer, use it to heat their public swimming pool.
Posted on Reply
#52
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
Just sit it in a pool and make sure its water proof and it will heat it up. Or you could use it to boil water for tea or for cooking etc.
Posted on Reply
#53
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
newtekie1They do need to cnvert this setup to water cooler. Maybe they can do what that village in Europe did with their water cooling setup for their IBM super-computer, use it to heat their public swimming pool.
Wow he is being all serious about this While Shadow and Dr are joking about it, LMAO!!!
Posted on Reply
#54
Morgoth
Fueled by Sapphire
DrPepperI doubt it since gpu's are much more efficient for that kinda stuff. Unless you mean they replace the phenom with a nehalem.
no i'm talking abouth bandwith of ram and quikpath
Posted on Reply
#55
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
:laugh: I'm going to make mine a reality :cool: DrPeppers nuclear nvidia reactor.
Posted on Reply
#56
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
Morgothno i'm talking abouth bandwith of ram and quikpath
Yeah the ram was the weakpoint in the system. I think nehalem with the 4 Gx2's would cure cancer.
Posted on Reply
#57
Morgoth
Fueled by Sapphire
i hope so :)
Posted on Reply
#58
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
DrPepper:laugh: I'm going to make mine a reality :cool: DrPeppers nuclear nvidia reactor.
ya since Green is Related to Nuclear Waste, glowing green lolz.
Posted on Reply
#59
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
Morgothi hope so :)
If it does i'l be an intel believer for life :toast:
eidairaman1ya since Green is Related to Nuclear Waste, glowing green lolz.
and green is good for the environment = greenpeace loves me
Posted on Reply
#60
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
not nuclear waste dude.
Posted on Reply
#61
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
eidairaman1not nuclear waste dude.
just tell them its fairies not radiation
Posted on Reply
#62
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
DrPepperjust tell them its fairies not radiation
Heh, thats amusing.
Posted on Reply
#63
Haytch
I dont see anything super about it.
Its actually a pretty crappy setup, except ofcourse the 4gfx cards. I applaud CUDA being used to make the cards render images given to them for medical purposes, thats gold and very smart, but other then that, its crappy. Actually, its a total piece of shit.

Sorry, i get emotional :P The only reason i call it a piece of shit computer is because someone actually thinks its SUPER . . . Like i said, nothing super about the actual pc. The super part is the people that wrote the program to make the pc render images for the medical purposes.

Dont IBM have a Supercomputer ? Doesnt everyone have a Supercomputer ?
Posted on Reply
#64
Disparia
They have a supercomputer until someone else outdoes them :)
Posted on Reply
#65
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
HaytchI dont see anything super about it.
Its actually a pretty crappy setup, except ofcourse the 4gfx cards. I applaud CUDA being used to make the cards render images given to them for medical purposes, thats gold and very smart, but other then that, its crappy. Actually, its a total piece of shit.

Sorry, i get emotional :P The only reason i call it a piece of shit computer is because someone actually thinks its SUPER . . . Like i said, nothing super about the actual pc. The super part is the people that wrote the program to make the pc render images for the medical purposes.

Dont IBM have a Supercomputer ? Doesnt everyone have a Supercomputer ?
"delivers roughly the same performance as a supercomputer cluster consisting of hundreds of PCs" If a single pc can do that imagine a cluster of them at roughly a fraction of the cost, if thats not super then your insane also CUDA means they can use it for almost anything a normal supercomputer can do e.g folding at hone or climate simulations etc etc
Posted on Reply
#67
Weer
Musselsfaulty logic there. SLI allows two images onto one display, but the work they're doing isnt even 3D, nor does it need to be displayed. They're using them as number crunchers through CUDA, not as video cards.
How crude of you to insult my logic. I was simply mis-informed or un-knowledged.

However, I thank you for clearing that up, as it did present a form of interest to me.
Posted on Reply
#68
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
WeerHow crude of you to insult my logic. I was simply mis-informed or un-knowledged.

However, I thank you for clearing that up, as it did present a form of interest to me.
making assumptions without any empirical evidence or prior knowledge, fits under faulty logic to me. Dont take it personally, it wasnt intended that way.
Video cards work fine in the same system dual display without SLI/crossfire, and always have since the PCI days.
Posted on Reply
#69
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
ill settle it, both yall stop arguing and kiss and makeup.
Posted on Reply
#70
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
eidairaman1ill settle it, both yall stop arguing and kiss and makeup.
:(
Posted on Reply
#71
sumit_malwadkar
What a shame.......:mad:

What a shame...... they have used AMD Phenom 9850 processor :laugh:.
Insted of AMD Phenom 9850 processor if they have used Intel Core2Extreme they will surely get more peroformance from this system....
Posted on Reply
#72
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
Not really since that was only to control the gpu's and the flow of information, if it did they would have used a core 2
Posted on Reply
#73
Morgoth
Fueled by Sapphire
sumit_malwadkarWhat a shame...... they have used AMD Phenom 9850 processor :laugh:.
Insted of AMD Phenom 9850 processor if they have used Intel Core2Extreme they will surely get more peroformance from this system....
and if the did that the would have a huge bottleneck from the FSB and ram
since amd phenom uses HT, HT gives allot more bandwith then FSB can ever offer
Posted on Reply
#74
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
Morgothand if the did that the would have a huge bottleneck from the FSB and ram
since amd phenom uses HT, HT gives allot more bandwith then FSB can ever offer
Cheers for explaining that :toast:
Posted on Reply
#75
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
no the HT has absolutely nothing to do with it. they say in the article, and i quoted it earlier - the ONLY reason they went AMD, was because they couldnt find an Intel board with 4x PCI-E slots.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 19th, 2024 08:16 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts