Thursday, April 16th 2009

Triplex Designs Radeon HD 4830 Without Auxiliary Power Connector

A relatively unknown company, Triplex, has designed a Radeon HD 4830 graphics accelerator that does not require the 6-pin PCI-Express power connector. This is especially interesting for two reasons: that it is RV770, and that it runs at reference clock speeds despite shedding its traditional power design. Spotted on XtremeSystems, this engineering sample PCB features a 2+1 phase power design, that draws all its power from the PCI-Express slot.

Also featured are 512 MB of 256-bit GDDR3 memory, DVI-D, HDMI and D-Sub outputs, and a seemingly two-slot cooler design that is yet to be pictured. The card lacks CrossFireX fingers. The GPU has 640 stream processors, DirectX 10.1 compliance, and a 256-bit memory interface. It has AMD reference clock speeds of 575/900 MHz (core/memory). For reference the third picture shows a Radeon HD 4670 accelerator of the same make, and PCB length.
Source: XtremeSystems
Add your own comment

42 Comments on Triplex Designs Radeon HD 4830 Without Auxiliary Power Connector

#26
Disparia
+1 to crazy_pyro and lemonadesoda.

To add a point, my case doesn't fit a 4870 well (but I'm making it work for now), I wouldn't mind a couple small 4830's or possibly the 4750's when they come out.

Also, my e-peen is larger than my sensibility concerning this stuff... somehow I'd feel better about having 3 x 4750's vs a 4890. Cuz I'd have 3 :D
Posted on Reply
#27
hat
Enthusiast
@FreedomEclipse: well now what are you going to do when they roll up with a whole battalion of tanks, you've depleated your nuclear arsenal :(

@Jizzler: That's a good point about the 4830 having a short PCB. I think it might even be shorter than my 8600gts's pcb. It is good to be able to fit a crysis-capable rig in a grandma-capable tower :roll:

oh yeah I forgot to mention... I am happy to see SOMEONE has taken the initiave and has started moving towards energy efficency with graphics cards. I believe that no computer should have to have a power supply greater than 500w (400-450w max load) unless it's something like a ridiculous fileserver with 10TB of storage space or some crunching workhouse with dual quad-core processors and 64gb RAM
Posted on Reply
#28
crazy pyro
The brits are calling in air strikes when they find a bunch of Afghan militants now, you just get them pinned down and then drop some big ol' bombs on them, if they're more spread out you go for the nuke!
Posted on Reply
#29
LittleLizard
i dont think it would be safe use that thing on a pci-e 1 gen slot :mad:
Posted on Reply
#30
W1zzard
Surely the 75w cap on PCI-E 1.1 would choke it?
LittleLizardi dont think it would be safe use that thing on a pci-e 1 gen slot :mad:
why do people think that? use google to a) find out how much power an x16 1.1 slot can provide b) find out what new features 2.0 brings
Posted on Reply
#31
hat
Enthusiast
W1zzardwhy do people think that? use google to a) find out how much power an x16 1.1 slot can provide b) find out what new features 2.0 brings
PCI-E x16 1.1: 75w, 4000MB/s bandwidth
PCI-E x16 2.0: 150w, 8000MB/s bandwidth
^^according to wikipedia

What most people are worried about is that running this 4830 in a 1.1 slot (75w) would be pushing the envelope. I wouldn't do it.
Posted on Reply
#33
W1zzard
hatWhat most people are worried about is that running this 4830 in a 1.1 slot (75w) would be pushing the envelope.
both 1.1 and 2.0 provide 75w max to the card. there is no difference
Posted on Reply
#34
crtecha
Thats awesome it looks really stubby :roll: I like that they are making the higher grade cards like this too.
Posted on Reply
#35
Disparia
O I C.
The power spec has also been increased. A new version of the power supply connector that is used for graphics cards that need more power than the slot can deliver (sometimes called a PEG connector, for PCI-Express Graphics) has been introduced, changing from 6 pins to 8. A single x16 card may now draw up to 300 W of power (75 W from the slot itself, 150 W from an 8-pin PEG connector, 75 W from a second PEG connector), up from 225 W (75 W from the slot, 75 W each from 2 6-pin PEG connectors) or originally 150 W (75 W from the slot, 75 W from a 6-pin PEG connector).
I think a lot of us have been going off when the early 2.0 boards were coming out, and it was reported by several news sites that it was 150w through the slot.
Posted on Reply
#36
SirMango
If performance is on par to the older reference design, that would be fantastic
Posted on Reply
#37
W1zzard
The power spec has also been increased. A new version of the power supply connector that is used for graphics cards that need more power than the slot can deliver (sometimes called a PEG connector, for PCI-Express Graphics) has been introduced, changing from 6 pins to 8. A single x16 card may now draw up to 300 W of power (75 W from the slot itself, 150 W from an 8-pin PEG connector, 75 W from a second PEG connector), up from 225 W (75 W from the slot, 75 W each from 2 6-pin PEG connectors) or originally 150 W (75 W from the slot, 75 W from a 6-pin PEG connector).
Posted on Reply
#38
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
Heh, finally W1zzard cleared this up. I was wondering why people keep saying that PCI-E 2.0 pulls out 150W from the slot. PCI-E (regardless if 1.1a or 2.0) only gets 75W from the motherboard.
Posted on Reply
#39
Silverel
W1zzardi dont think many people buy a 4830 and cf it
I did :D

O course, I got both cards for ~150$, so it was worth it. Kinda wish they would make this a Low-Profile card to compete with the LP 9600GT... AMD has nothing in that area...
Posted on Reply
#41
Hayder_Master
it cool , but it is still unknown company , and can the mobo handle power of 4 of them , quad crossfire
Posted on Reply
#42
AsRock
TPU addict
Can some one explain why you would need one in the 1st place ?. Unless programs like powerDVD and such take that much run these days. And if thats why not just go out and buy a DVD player and not even have the need to run a whole computer.. Well unless your monitor is better than your TV that is i guess it's understandable then.


I use a 7300GS with a AMD 3800 x2 and handles all internet based films and such without issue even HD.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 30th, 2024 18:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts